文丨果脯 这个月，游戏制作人小岛秀夫将迎来自己的62岁生日，在此期间他将持续完成全球巡回见面。 今年BW展会，小岛秀夫来到了上海。他与中国玩家们见面、交流，并送上《死亡搁浅2》的中文配音作为见面礼。在此期间，我们也终于得见这位传说 级的游戏制作人，并与他简单聊了聊。（专访视频可在视频号、B站搜索：「专访小岛秀夫&新川洋司：除了《死亡搁浅2》，他们还分享了不老秘 诀！」） 而在最新作《死亡搁浅2》中，他广泛融合过往作品的诸多设计，做出了一个集大成的总结式作品。乍听之下没啥，可小岛过去的每一部作品都有极其亮 眼的创新设计，唯独这次例外。游戏后半段各类打破心流的内容，也让部分玩家不禁质疑他如今是否只是「沉浸在自己的艺术里」。 死亡搁浅2海报 有人说，小岛这是江郎才尽，做不出新东西了。有人则认为，年龄上来后，哪怕是「那位小岛」，也不免开始怀旧，整理起自己的前半生。说来说去，其 实都是一个声音，「小岛秀夫很有才华，但他老了」。 从生理层面来说，是的，小岛秀夫的确老了。他已经迈过了耳顺之年，又还有太多的事情想要完成。不久前，小岛还将自己的创意与灵感存进U盘里，希 望未来有人能把「小岛」传承下去，其中多少有点「烈士暮年，壮 ...

洞见 （ DJ00123987 ） —— 不一样的观点，不一样的故事， 3000 万人订阅的微信大号。点击标题下蓝字 " 洞见 " 关注，我们将为您提供有价 值、有意思的延伸阅读。 作者：洞见Moon 不能听命于自己者，就要受命于他人。 ♬ 点上方播放按钮可收听洞见主播素年锦时 朗读音频 点赞一个观点，就会收到更多类似的推荐，让你深信观点的正确性…… 算法像是一个知心朋友，让你看到的都是自己想看的，听到的都是自己想听的。 同时，它也精准地将每个人锁在自己的信息茧房里，让人在不知不觉间，变得封闭、偏执。 2015年，作家李尚龙曾说： 废掉一个年轻人，一根网线就够了。 如今十年过去，算法让这句话更具冲击力。 TED做过一项统计。 Twitter每日推文量在5亿条以上，浏览量超2000亿次，用户每天观看推文超300条。 更可怕的是，这些信息都是经过算法筛选，投其所好的推荐。 点看短视频，就会刷到无数同类型的内容，吸引你的注意力； 01 美国科技巨头思科公司CEO罗卓克曾说： 这个时代会让错误的观点变得正确，从而更加错误。 仔细想来，的确如此。 这人每天看着论坛的更新内容，越发情绪高涨，自认为得到了更确切的佐证，并为 ...

转自：北京日报客户端 第十八届全球青年模拟联合国大会（WE Model United Nations EXPO 2025，简称 WEMUN EXPO 2025）8月1日在北京开幕。本届大会以"我们，即答案！（WE, the answers!）"为主题，引导全球青年在 多元文化背景下，通过对话与合作，应对全球性挑战。 据悉，会前组委会通过线上学术培训和标准化流程确保高水准学术体验。会议期间，代表们除委员会讨 论外，还将参与"联合国可持续发展目标工作坊"及"顶尖高校国际模联主席交流"等特色活动。 察哈尔学会秘书长、前驻突尼斯和毛里塔尼亚大使张建国在致辞中指出："模拟联合国是国际化的舞 台，帮助青年们筑牢语言根基、培养包容心态、拓展全球视野。" 联合国困境的解决需建立在人类共同价值观基础上；青年们的参与，正是推动这一进程的关键力量。本 届大会将为构建和平、安全、发展的全球治理体系注入新活力。 今年恰逢联合国成立80周年。本次大会汇聚了来自十多个国家的千余名青年代表。在为期四天的会议 中，青年代表们将在来自耶鲁大学、芝加哥大学、牛津大学、加州大学伯克利分校、麦吉尔大学、波士 顿大学，以及北京大学、中山大学等高校的模拟 ...

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the evolution of information consumption from "information cocoons" to "honeycombs," emphasizing the need for a new understanding of information ecosystems in the digital age [2][3]. Group 1: Information Cocoon Concept - The concept of "information cocoon" reflects a phenomenon where individuals are trapped in a narrow information space, often due to algorithmic filtering and personal preferences [10][11]. - The emergence of personalized content delivery systems has led to a fragmentation of audiences, creating isolated "information islands" [8][9]. - The discussion highlights the dual nature of information cocoons, where some are self-imposed through user choices, while others are more insidious and difficult to detect [10][11]. Group 2: The Role of Algorithms and Technology - Algorithms play a crucial role in shaping information consumption, often reinforcing existing preferences and limiting exposure to diverse viewpoints [12][13]. - The article suggests that the current era of algorithm-driven content distribution has intensified the effects of information cocoons compared to previous media forms [13][14]. - There is a call for a balanced approach that combines algorithmic recommendations with user agency to enhance content diversity [20][34]. Group 3: The Honeycomb Metaphor - The "honeycomb" metaphor represents a new vision for information ecosystems, where diverse and interconnected content can thrive, contrasting with the isolation of cocoons [36][37]. - The article proposes that the honeycomb model could facilitate better information sharing and engagement among users, promoting a more holistic understanding of the world [36][37]. - The need for content curators or gatekeepers is emphasized to ensure quality and diversity in information delivery, akin to traditional media roles [37][38]. Group 4: User Responsibility and Education - Users are seen as co-creators of their information environments, and there is a need for education on how to navigate digital spaces effectively [22][34]. - The article stresses the importance of fostering critical thinking and awareness of the implications of technology on information consumption [34][35]. - Encouraging proactive engagement with diverse content sources is essential to mitigate the risks associated with information cocoons [22][34].

Core Viewpoint - The Taiwanese authorities' request for public officials to uninstall five mainland applications, including Xiaohongshu, is seen as an abuse of power and a regressive action that will face public opposition [1] Group 1: Government Actions - The Taiwanese government, led by the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), claims the need for security as a reason for banning these applications, which is perceived as a facade for their own insecurities [1] - The DPP's actions are characterized as excessive and counterproductive, indicating a fear of losing control over information flow to the public [1] Group 2: Public Sentiment - The popularity of mainland applications among Taiwanese citizens, especially the youth, is attributed to their efficiency in information access, convenience in life services, and engaging social sharing experiences [1] - The DPP's measures are likely to provoke public dissent, as they attempt to maintain an "information cocoon" that limits exposure to the realities of mainland China [1]

Group 1 - The article highlights the increasing political violence in the U.S., with recent incidents raising concerns about a disturbing "new normal" [1][2] - Political polarization between the Democratic and Republican parties is intensifying, eroding the foundations of American democracy [1][2] - Key areas of contention include immigration policy, energy policy, and social welfare, with significant differences in approaches between the two parties [1][2][3] Group 2 - The article discusses the impact of Trump's policies, which have exacerbated class divisions and led to a decline in social mobility and trust in government [2][3] - A significant increase in threats against members of Congress has been reported, with over 9,400 threats in 2024, more than double the number from a decade ago [2][3] - The federal government has increased the budget for the Capitol Police to $833 million in response to rising violence, nearly double the $464 million budget from 2020 [2][3] Group 3 - The rise of generative artificial intelligence is noted as a factor that could further polarize society and influence election outcomes [3][4] - The spread of misinformation and the creation of "information silos" are contributing to the escalation of violence and political extremism [3][4] - A survey of political scientists indicates a belief that the U.S. is moving towards a form of authoritarianism, with concerns about the erosion of democratic norms [4][5] Group 4 - The article emphasizes the need for bipartisan cooperation to address economic inequality and political violence, which are seen as root causes of societal division [5][6] - Restoring public trust in institutions and bridging social divides are identified as critical challenges for the U.S. government [6]

前言：蜂房作为方法，走向更辽阔之地 去年冬天，我去拜访一家咨询机构时，曾经问其中的一位分析师如何收集资讯的，他们说早年还会购买一些简报产品，后来当主流新闻资讯App都用上算 法推荐之后，他们就开始尝试不断用主动搜索的方式，调教出一套推荐信息流，让这款软件成为他们上游信息原材料供应地。 这当然是非常精英、专业的信息"薅羊毛"方式，好比米其林大厨在荒郊野外的一次露营中，用林中的松露、春笋，借助随身携带的卡式炉做出了一道大 餐，给人惊喜，但绝对少见，难以复刻。 大部分人用资讯App，无非也就是了解下国家大事、娱乐八卦，积累谈资，打发时间。最近几年，短视频兴起，比传统图文更直观，更不费脑细胞，于是 人们停留在各种流行App上的时间就更多了。 我去往这家公司的路上，就看到了另外一种享受信息投喂的快乐：地铁邻座的一位大叔，也是对着同款软件，开着音量惊人的外放，对着手机笑得前仰后 合。那一刻他一定是快乐的，当然，也得感谢北京地铁良好的5G信号，为刺激多巴胺分泌提供了可靠的信息基础设施。 这就是2025年，千人千面的网络冲浪现实：同一款软件、不同的用法，经历不同的世界。使用算法的软件，并不是格林童话中满足一切的魔镜，它更像是 ...

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the concept of "information cocoons" and proposes the idea of "information beehives" as a method to break free from these cocoons, aiming to create a better information ecosystem in the algorithm-driven era [5][34][35]. Group 1: Information Cocoon Concept - The term "information cocoon" was introduced by Cass Sunstein in 2006, highlighting how individuals tend to consume information that aligns with their existing beliefs, leading to a narrow perspective [8][9]. - The article differentiates between "information cocoons," "echo chambers," and "filter bubbles," noting that all three concepts describe how individuals can become isolated in their information consumption [9][11]. - The rise of algorithms has exacerbated the information cocoon phenomenon, as users are increasingly exposed to content that reinforces their existing views, limiting their exposure to diverse perspectives [20][22]. Group 2: Algorithm's Role - Algorithms are designed to maximize user engagement and satisfaction, often leading to a cycle of reinforcing existing interests and preferences [17][18]. - The article identifies four mechanisms of algorithms that contribute to the formation of information cocoons: goal orientation, positive feedback loops, data dependency, and similarity matching [18]. - The transition from a "search for information" model to an "information finds people" model has made it easier for users to access content but has also led to the risk of becoming trapped in echo chambers [19][20]. Group 3: Proposed Solutions - The concept of "information beehives" is introduced as a proactive approach to encourage users to seek diverse information sources and engage with different viewpoints [5][35]. - Recommendations for breaking free from information cocoons include actively subscribing to unfamiliar content, participating in cross-disciplinary discussions, and regularly challenging one's own viewpoints [6][35]. - The article emphasizes the importance of building a collaborative mechanism among content producers, platforms, and consumers to foster a healthier information ecosystem [5][34].

Core Viewpoint - Geoffrey Hinton, known as the "Godfather of AI," expresses regret over his life's work in AI, highlighting the potential risks and consequences of AI development, urging humanity to reconsider its direction [2][4][17]. Group 1: Hinton's Background and Career - Hinton joined Google to support his son, who has learning disabilities, and has since become a prominent figure in AI, winning prestigious awards like the Nobel Prize in Physics and the Turing Award [3][13][15]. - He initially focused on neural networks, a choice that was not widely accepted at the time, but has proven to be correct as AI has advanced significantly [9][10]. Group 2: AI Risks Identified by Hinton - Hinton categorizes AI risks into short-term and long-term threats, emphasizing the need for awareness and caution [21]. - Short-term risks include a dramatic increase in cyberattacks, with a reported 12,200% rise from 2023 to 2024, facilitated by AI technologies [22][25]. - The potential for individuals with basic biological knowledge to create highly infectious and deadly viruses using AI tools is a significant concern [26]. - AI's ability to manipulate personal habits and decisions through data analysis poses a risk of creating echo chambers and deepening societal divides [29][30]. Group 3: Long-term Risks and Predictions - Hinton warns of the emergence of superintelligent AI that could surpass human intelligence within 20 years, with a predicted extinction risk of 10%-20% for humanity [32][35]. - He compares humanity's relationship with superintelligent AI to that of chickens to humans, suggesting that humans may become subservient to their creations [37]. - The potential for widespread unemployment due to AI replacing cognitive jobs is highlighted, with recent layoffs at Microsoft exemplifying this trend [39][41]. Group 4: Recommendations for the Future - Hinton suggests that individuals consider careers in trades, such as plumbing, which are less likely to be replaced by AI [43][47]. - He advocates for increased investment in AI safety research and stricter regulatory measures to manage AI development responsibly [44][54]. - The importance of fostering unique personal skills and interests is emphasized as a way to thrive in an AI-dominated future [48][49].

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the emergence and cultural significance of the "Adam's Apple Cover," a satirical fashion item for men, reflecting contemporary gender discussions and societal norms [21][22][45]. Summary by Sections Cultural Significance - The "Adam's Apple Cover" is seen as a new fashion item for men, symbolizing a shift in gender dynamics and societal expectations [9][21]. - It serves as a parody of traditional gender roles, suggesting that just as women have clothing to conceal their secondary sexual characteristics, men should also have similar items [22][25]. Product Description - The item is essentially a piece of fabric designed to cover the throat area, primarily to hide the Adam's apple, and is suggested to be worn from puberty onwards [13][15]. - Different materials and styles are recommended based on the wearer's age and aesthetic preferences, with an emphasis on modesty in more conservative areas [16][18]. Market Trends - The Adam's Apple Cover has gained popularity, with businesses beginning to mass-produce it, often marketed alongside other fashion accessories [36][45]. - Prices for these items are generally affordable, around several dozen yuan, and they come in various styles and materials [36]. Gender Dynamics - The rise of the Adam's Apple Cover is linked to the broader trend of "gender-reversal" content on social media, which often critiques traditional male behavior through a female lens [49][50]. - This content has become a popular genre, with many female creators participating, leading to a surge in viewership and engagement [51][54]. Social Commentary - The article critiques the entertainment value derived from gender-based humor, suggesting that while it may provide temporary amusement, it perpetuates a cycle of inequality and resentment between genders [66][72]. - It raises questions about the effectiveness of such narratives in resolving deeper societal issues, emphasizing the need for more constructive dialogue rather than superficial entertainment [72][110].