转自：新华财经 近日，深圳大学深圳城市传播创新研究中心发布《短视频用户的算法实践与"破茧"报告》（下称《报告》），并 在传播学院举行研讨会，来自清华大学、复旦大学、北京师范大学、中国传媒大学、暨南大学等多所高校的学者 围绕算法相关议题展开研讨。 《报告》对抖 这种积极感知的背后，是用户在互动中表现出的强烈主动性。超过75%的受访者相信自己的行为能"驯化"算法，例 如通过主动搜索影响后续推荐；同时，超过65%的用户表示能熟练运用"不感兴趣"等功能调整内容。此外，报告发 现超六成用户有主动"破茧"的意愿与行为，如跨平台获取信息、主动了解不同观点等。 《报告》负责人深圳大学传播学院教授、深圳城市传播创新研究中心主任虞鑫指出，算法的本质更像是"塑镜"而 非"造茧"——它主要扮演一面映射用户兴趣的镜子，而用户的能动性则是打破信息壁垒、探索更广阔世界的关 键。 为从客观机制上验证这一观点，报告还开展了代理实验，揭示不同平台算法对用户行为的响应机制。课题组在抖 音、哔哩哔哩、小红书创建虚拟账号，模拟仅浏览信息流、日常点击互动、搜索和评论多元内容等三种用户行 为，追踪其首页推荐内容的多样性变化。研究发现，抖音的算法在保持高多 ...

张朝阳特别提到，搜狐视频关注流不只是以视频会友，也不仅关心消费的内容，更重视人与人之间的关 系，走的是社交分发的路径；他强调，这种路径差异本质上是社交属性与算法推荐的区别："它有点像 真实世界的一场party，我认识的人发表了观点，我还能跟他打招呼互动。"也正因为以人际连接为核 心，所以关注流内不会产生信息茧房。 他还宣布，搜狐视频将重启美剧战略，以丰富关注流生态。此外，搜狐视频还将"长短结合"，既平台化 运营热门的竖屏短剧，也自制横屏短剧。（勃潺） 【环球网科技综合报道】11月9日消息，近日，在2025年世界互联网大会上，搜狐创始人、董事局主席 兼首席执行官、物理学博士张朝阳表示，当前搜狐仍专注于传统的消费者互联网，"尤其是在媒体以及 社交方面，关注流是我们现在的重点"。据了解，关注流是搜狐视频打造的核心社交产品，围绕PGC、 UGC、Vlog自媒体短视频构建精品化垂直平台，涵盖幽默搞笑类"有趣"内容、知识类"有用"内容、国风 舞蹈类"观赏性强"内容的多元生态。 来源：环球网 ...

长久以来，我们都认识到了社交媒体给我们的生活所带来的新挑战。在这之中，由哈佛大学法学院的凯斯·桑斯坦教授（Cass Sunstein）所提出的"信息茧 房"的概念在中文世界中得到了广泛传播。"信息茧房"，顾名思义， 就是我们在社交媒体上只接触到某一类信息，导致个体对于世界的理解被困在狭小的 信息之茧中。而随着个性化推荐的算法在社交媒体与短视频平台上的广泛应用，这种对于自我封闭的担忧显得更加迫切，尽管并不严谨，人们也会提 到"同温层"，"过滤气泡"，"傻子共振"这样的用语，并且认为算法推荐的发展加剧了传播生态的恶化，导致个体走向封闭，使激烈的观点在社交场域中获 得更多的关注。 在今天，社交媒体已经深深地嵌入了人们的日常生活，当个体面对现实世界中的信息爆炸时，对于信息进行过滤与整理似乎是一种必然的选择。为了应对 社交媒体的所带来挑战，算法工程师们提出了许多平台层面的干预策略。随着推荐算法的不断完善，推送到人们面前的信息已经在变得更加平衡且丰富。 与此同时，人们对于个性化推荐所带来的"信息茧房"或"同温层效应"感到担忧。例如，特定的社交平台会根据用户的政治倾向推荐同质化的内容，导致用 户只能接触到片面的信息来源。从 ...

我们为什么总觉得是算法在作恶？ 打开社交媒体，你是否常常感到困惑：为什么我的信息流里充斥着让人不适的内容？为什么极端观点总能 获得更多曝光？为什么我似乎被困在了一个信息茧房里？ 几乎所有人的第一反应都是：这一定是算法的锅。 我们习惯性地认为，是算法在暗中操纵我们的信息流，制造对立，把我们关进一个个茧房。如果没有这些 算法推荐，社交媒体一定会更健康、更理性、更多元。 但来自荷兰阿姆斯特丹大学的一项最新研究，却给出了一个颠覆性的答案：即使没有任何算法推荐，社交 媒体也会自然演化成今天这个撕裂的样子。 一个极简社交平台的AI模拟实验 这项研究发表在论文《我们能修复社交媒体吗？用生成式社交模拟来测试各种干预措施》（Can We Fix Social Media? Evaluating Interventions Using Generative Social Simulations）中。 研究人员设计了一个极简版的社交平台，这个平台： 完全没有算法推荐 只有三个基础功能：发帖、转帖、关注 按时间顺序展示你关注的人的内容 就像最早期的Twitter和微博 但研究的创新之处在于，他们没有招募真实用户，而是用大语言模型（L ...

Core Viewpoint - The Central Committee's proposal emphasizes the promotion of new mass arts under internet conditions, encouraging widespread cultural activities and creative participation from the public [1] Group 1: Development of New Mass Arts - The proposal aims to support and guide the development of new mass arts, leveraging the creativity and innovation emerging from the internet [1] - The rise of new mass arts is attributed to improved living standards and the deepening of information technology, leading to unprecedented public engagement in artistic creation [1] Group 2: User Engagement and Market Trends - By June 2025, the user base for short videos and micro-dramas in China is projected to reach 1.068 billion and 626 million, respectively [1] - There is a concern regarding creators prioritizing short-term commercial gains, resulting in trends of superficial entertainment and homogenization [1] Group 3: Research and Development Ecosystem - It is suggested to enhance research on the development patterns, value logic, and ethical technology use in new mass arts to create a favorable development ecosystem [2] - Emphasis is placed on the importance of quality in new mass arts, focusing on meeting the spiritual and cultural needs of the public [2]

Core Insights - The article discusses the phenomenon of "chatbait," where AI chatbots like ChatGPT use engaging questions to keep users in conversation, similar to how clickbait attracts users to web pages [5][12][22] - OpenAI's approach is to provide assistance, but the strategy of continuous questioning can lead to prolonged interactions that may not always be beneficial for users [4][6][12] Group 1: User Interaction with AI - Users often engage with ChatGPT for casual inquiries, but the majority do not utilize it as a productivity tool, indicating a gap in user expectations versus actual usage [6] - ChatGPT employs a strategy of breaking down tasks into smaller steps, enticing users to continue the conversation by offering additional assistance [8][12] - The frequent use of questions at the end of responses creates a sense of ongoing engagement, making it difficult for users to conclude their interactions [9][12] Group 2: Emotional and Psychological Implications - The emotional engagement fostered by AI chatbots can lead to increased user loyalty, but it also raises concerns about the potential for negative psychological effects, especially among vulnerable individuals [16][17] - A tragic case highlighted in the article illustrates how prolonged interaction with ChatGPT can lead to harmful outcomes, emphasizing the need for awareness regarding the emotional impact of AI conversations [17][20] - The article suggests that while AI can provide helpful reminders and suggestions, it can also create a burden, making users feel overwhelmed by continuous prompts for new tasks [16][21] Group 3: Industry Trends and Concerns - The article draws parallels between chatbait and historical forms of baiting, suggesting that these tactics are not new but have evolved with technology [21][22] - The shift from passive to active engagement in AI interactions reflects broader trends in technology, where user attention is increasingly commodified [22] - The ongoing development of AI chatbots raises questions about ethical considerations and the responsibility of companies to mitigate potential harms associated with their products [13][21]

Core Ideas - The discussion revolves around the concept of cosmology and its influence on civilization, emphasizing the need to make the invisible aspects of our worldview visible [2][5] Group 1: Understanding Cosmology - Cosmology is described as a comprehensive system of beliefs, ideas, and assumptions that forms the underlying framework of human thought, often unnoticed [2] - The book aims to elucidate how our current worldview has historically developed, making the invisible aspects of cosmology visible [2] Group 2: East-West Cosmological Differences - The fundamental differences between Eastern and Western cosmologies are highlighted, with Western thought rooted in binary oppositions, while Chinese civilization emphasizes harmony and interconnectedness [5] - This divergence in thought processes has led to different paths in technological and philosophical development, with Chinese civilization focusing on holistic understanding rather than mere categorization [5] Group 3: Historical Perspectives on Power and Cosmology - The evolution of cosmology is closely linked to power structures, with historical shifts in perception of China by the West reflecting changes in power dynamics, particularly post-Industrial Revolution [8][9] - The narrative of China transitioning from a model of rational governance to being perceived as "backward" is discussed, emphasizing the role of European industrial and military superiority in shaping these views [8][9] Group 4: Crisis of Belief Systems - The collapse of cosmological frameworks can be abrupt and painful, as illustrated by the impact of World War I on Western belief systems, leading to a reevaluation of progress and rationality [10][11] - The current technological revolution, including AI and the internet, is likened to the upheaval of World War I, reshaping societal, political, and economic landscapes [11] Group 5: Existential Challenges in Modern Society - The conversation touches on the existential crises faced by youth in both China and the West, with concerns about employment, meaning in life, and the efficacy of capitalism [12] - The role of social media and AI in exacerbating cognitive dissonance and societal polarization is emphasized, highlighting the need for open-mindedness to combat cognitive pollution [12] Group 6: Future Perspectives on Civilizational Coexistence - The future is envisioned as a symphony of diverse civilizations coexisting rather than merging, with metaphors of trees coexisting and orchestras harmonizing to illustrate this point [14][15] - Embracing diversity is seen as a source of creativity, with the notion that differences should be appreciated rather than viewed as threats [15]

Core Viewpoint - Recent discussions on WeChat Moments have sparked significant debate, with some users claiming that fewer people are posting, leading to concerns about the platform's relevance [2] Group 1: User Engagement - WeChat's public relations director, Zoe, stated that 780 million users access Moments daily, with 120 million users posting content, indicating stable engagement levels over the years [4] - Zoe refuted claims that fewer people are posting, emphasizing that the data contradicts such assertions [4] Group 2: Platform Features - Zoe clarified that there is no algorithm for sorting Moments, describing it as a personal "chronicle" for users [4] - The absence of a visitor feature and the inability to edit posts were explained as intentional design choices to reduce social pressure on users [4] Group 3: Account Management - The WeChat team has optimized the handling of deceased accounts, stating that since September, inactive accounts will no longer be reclaimed, allowing them to serve as a memorial [4]

Core Insights - The article discusses the current state of WeChat Moments, revealing that 120 million users still share content daily, indicating that the platform remains a vital social space in China despite perceptions of inactivity [3][4]. User Engagement - Daily, 780 million users access Moments, with 120 million actively sharing content, demonstrating that the platform is far from "dying" [3]. - The feeling of fewer posts is attributed to the "information cocoon" effect, where increased friend numbers dilute the content shared [4]. Changes in Sharing Behavior - Users are now more selective about what to share due to the presence of colleagues, family, and acquaintances, leading to a more curated sharing experience [5]. - The absence of visitor tracking and editing features reflects WeChat's understanding of social pressures, aiming to reduce the burden on users [5]. Product Philosophy - WeChat maintains that Moments should serve as a genuine record of life rather than a platform for performance, emphasizing authenticity over perfection [6]. - The decision to not recycle inactive accounts shows a commitment to preserving memories for the deceased, allowing friends and family to revisit shared moments [5]. Future Considerations - The article suggests that users should return to the essence of sharing, focusing on genuine connections rather than external validation, to revitalize the platform [6].

Core Insights - The topic "Is WeChat Moments cooling down?" has become a trending subject on social media as of October 16 [1] - A response article titled "Is no one really posting on Moments?" was published by the WeChat official account on October 15, addressing concerns about the usage of Moments [2] Group 1: User Engagement and Data - According to the WeChat public relations director, 780 million users access Moments daily, with 120 million users posting on it, indicating stable engagement over the years [4] - The director refuted claims that fewer people are posting on Moments, suggesting that such perceptions are subjective and akin to an "information cocoon" [4] Group 2: Product Features and Philosophy - The WeChat public relations director clarified that the Moments feed is sorted chronologically without an algorithm, emphasizing a straightforward approach to content visibility [4] - Regarding the absence of a visitor feature and secondary editing for Moments, the director stated that these decisions are made to avoid increasing social pressure on users [4] - The director also mentioned that Moments serves as a historical record of an individual's life, and thus, the introduction of a secondary editing feature is unlikely [4]