【大河财立方消息】8月6日消息，上海市财政局等三部门日前联合发布关于开展2025年上海市政府采购 领域"四类"违法违规行为专项整治工作的通知。 通知明确本次专项整治工作的重点内容。采购人倾斜照顾本地企业，指向特定供应商或特定产品，以供 应商注册地、所有制形式、组织形式、股权结构、投资者国别、经营年限、财务指标等不合理条件对供 应商实行差别歧视待遇；代理机构违规收费、逾期退还保证金；供应商提供虚假的检测报告、认证证 书、合同业绩、中小企业声明函等材料谋取中标；供应商投标文件相互混装、异常一致，投标保证金从 统一账户转出，委托同一单位或个人编制投标文件、办理投标事宜等恶意串通行为。 同时，结合上海市工作实际，对依法公开政府采购信息、落实政府采购政策、及时签订采购合同、合同 转包或违法分包、按时支付合同款项等重点监管事项开展监督检查。 通知提出，本次专项整治工作全面落实代理机构分级分类检查制度，本次纳入专项整治的代理机构共 149家。 | | | 专项整治代理机构检查名单 | | --- | --- | --- | | 序号 | 检查单位 | 检查对象 | | 1 | 浦东新区财政局 | 上海建融工程建设管理有限公 ...

Core Viewpoint - The article analyzes the salary situation of R&D and sales employees in 50 listed instrument companies in China, revealing the competitive landscape for talent in the instrument industry [2]. Group 1: Government Procurement Special Rectification - The government procurement special rectification work for 2025 has officially started, focusing on four types of illegal activities: discriminatory clauses by purchasers, irregular charges by agencies, provision of false materials by suppliers, and collusion among suppliers [3][4]. - The rectification period is from June this year to the end of January next year, aiming to further standardize the government procurement market order and consolidate previous rectification results [5]. Group 2: Specific Illegal Activities - Discriminatory clauses by purchasers include preferential treatment for local enterprises or specific brands through unreasonable conditions, leading to unfair selection based on factors like registration location and ownership structure [4]. - Irregular charges by agencies involve issues such as unauthorized fees and failure to return deposits on time, which harm suppliers' legitimate rights [4]. - Suppliers providing false materials refers to the submission of fake inspection reports and certificates to obtain bidding qualifications, undermining fair competition and affecting the safety and efficiency of national financial resources [5]. - Collusion among suppliers involves mutual agreements to manipulate bids and maliciously lower prices, severely violating the principles of fairness and transparency in government procurement [5].