Core Viewpoint - The dissolution of the "Komeito-LDP coalition" after 26 years has shocked the Japanese political landscape, with Komeito facing accusations from certain right-wing politicians regarding its relationship with China and its decision to exit the coalition [1][3]. Group 1: Komeito's Response - Komeito leader, Kaito Tetsuo, refuted claims that the party was acting under Chinese directives to block a political figure from becoming Prime Minister, labeling these accusations as "baseless" [3][4]. - Tetsuo emphasized that his role is to serve the interests of Japan and its citizens, not to act on behalf of China, expressing regret over the emergence of such rumors [3][4]. Group 2: Political Context - Analysts suggest that the accusations against Komeito stem from deep-rooted party conflicts within Japan, with right-wing politicians attempting to exploit the party's pro-China stance to fuel anti-China sentiments [3][4]. - The timing of Tetsuo's meeting with the Chinese ambassador, just days before the coalition's dissolution, has been used by right-wing politicians as supposed evidence of Komeito's alleged collusion with China [3][4]. Group 3: Normal Diplomatic Engagement - Tetsuo clarified that the meeting with the Chinese ambassador was a pre-scheduled diplomatic engagement, typical for a party leader, and involved no directives or demands from the Chinese side [4]. - The ongoing dialogue between Komeito and China is framed as normal diplomatic relations, which aligns with Komeito's long-standing advocacy for peace and improved Sino-Japanese relations [4].

Group 1 - The United States has requested the European Union to impose tariffs on India and China as a means to pressure Russia regarding the Ukraine crisis, which the EU has rejected [1] - Some U.S. politicians are using the Ukraine crisis as a pretext to exert economic pressure on China, aiming to undermine China's development and benefit from the situation, which is characterized as bullying behavior [1][2] - The EU is urged to maintain its strategic autonomy and recognize that U.S. sanctions could harm its economic vitality and disrupt its close trade relations with China [1][2] Group 2 - China and the EU have a long-standing cooperative relationship, with bilateral trade consistently growing, and any sanctions from the EU against China would destabilize supply chains and negatively impact European businesses [2] - The historical context shows that cooperation between China and the EU outweighs competition, and maintaining an independent stance is crucial for Europe to protect its interests and promote global peace [2] - The resolution of the Ukraine crisis should focus on dialogue and negotiation rather than creating new conflicts, emphasizing the need for equal cooperation in international relations [2]

Core Viewpoint - The Chinese government is actively addressing the case of two Chinese students being prosecuted in the U.S. for smuggling dangerous bacteria, emphasizing the need for adherence to local laws and the protection of citizens' rights abroad [1]. Group 1 - The Chinese consulate in Chicago is seeking to understand the details of the case through relevant channels [1]. - The Chinese government has lodged a formal protest with the U.S. regarding the failure of U.S. law enforcement to fulfill obligations under the China-U.S. consular treaty [1]. - The Chinese government maintains that it will protect the legitimate rights and interests of its citizens abroad while opposing the politicization of the case by the U.S. under the guise of ideology and national security [1].