Group 1 - The core issue highlighted is the detrimental impact of "formality" and "bureaucracy" in governance, leading to ineffective projects and loss of public trust [1] - A specific case is mentioned where a former county secretary initiated a tourism project costing over 20 million, which failed to operate effectively, reflecting poor decision-making [1] - The report emphasizes the need for a correct performance view among party members to avoid superficial projects that waste resources and harm the government's image [1] Group 2 - The importance of prioritizing practical solutions over superficial appearances is underscored, as seen in the example of a local government maintaining a modest entrance while focusing on service delivery [2] - Successful development in tourism is linked to thorough research and tailored strategies, contrasting with impulsive and unplanned initiatives [2] - The report advocates for a grounded approach to governance, emphasizing the need for real achievements that address community needs [2] Group 3 - The concept of "nail-driving spirit" is introduced, stressing the importance of long-term, foundational work over short-term gains in governance [3] - The report calls for a shift away from performance-driven impulses towards a focus on substantial, measurable outcomes that benefit the community [3] - It highlights that the true measure of a party member's performance lies in tangible development results and public satisfaction [3]