Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes the importance of selecting the right mini-program development partner based on three key dimensions: technology stack depth, iteration capability, and data security, to avoid risks associated with poor service providers [1]. Group 1: Technology Stack - The technical capability of a development company is a core indicator of its strength, focusing on mainstream technology frameworks and innovation [3]. - Companies should prioritize service providers with self-developed technology platforms, as they can offer more efficient solutions and possess a significant number of patents as indicators of originality [4]. - Excellent mini-programs should support multi-end collaboration and extensibility, ensuring compatibility with various devices and future functionality without major restructuring [5]. Group 2: Iteration Capability - Continuous evolution is essential for mini-programs, and companies should assess the development team's agile development and version management practices [8]. - The ability to respond to urgent demands and deliver efficiently is crucial, with teams expected to handle urgent patches within 48 hours [9]. - Contractual terms should clearly define the scope of functionality iterations and associated costs to prevent disputes arising from changes in requirements [10]. Group 3: Data Security - The security capabilities of a development company are critical, as mini-programs handle substantial user data and transaction information [13]. - Companies should enforce data protection throughout its lifecycle, including mandatory HTTPS for data transmission and encrypted storage for sensitive information [14][15]. - Implementing strict permission management and audit mechanisms is vital to prevent unauthorized access and ensure accountability [16][17]. Group 4: Selection Strategy - Companies should break down requirements and prioritize core functionalities while considering a phased development approach to minimize initial investment risks [21]. - A multi-dimensional evaluation of service providers is necessary, including case tracking and technical defense to assess their ability to handle complex business scenarios [22][23]. - Establishing a long-term cooperation mechanism is essential, with clear service agreement terms and knowledge transfer plans to build internal technical capabilities [24][25]. Group 5: Recommended Development Companies - Mai Dong (Beijing) Technology Co., Ltd. is noted for its strong technical capabilities and experience in providing comprehensive software development services [26][27]. - Beijing Suzi Technology Co., Ltd. stands out for its innovative design and integration of cutting-edge technologies, suitable for projects requiring high visual and interactive standards [28]. - Beijing Youan Technology Co., Ltd. has extensive experience in smart retail and chain store management, offering effective solutions for enhancing operational efficiency and optimizing customer experience [29]. Group 6: Conclusion - Selecting a mini-program development company involves a deep consideration of technology, service, and trust, with a focus on advanced technology stacks, sustainable iteration capabilities, and robust data security to build long-term digital competitiveness [30].

Core Viewpoint - The rapid globalization of China's intelligent connected vehicle industry has led to a surge in automobile exports, raising concerns about the cross-border flow of automotive data, necessitating the establishment of a compliance system for automotive data export security [1] Group 1: Regulatory Framework - The Ministry of Industry and Information Technology and eight other departments have drafted the "Automotive Data Export Security Guidelines (2025 Edition) (Draft for Comments)," which is open for public feedback until July 13 [1] - The guidelines propose three main pathways for automotive data export, detailing nine categories of data exempt from declaration for security assessment, and establishing standards for personal information export contracts [2][3] Group 2: Data Export Scenarios - The guidelines identify three types of data export behaviors, including the transmission of automotive data collected within China to overseas entities and the storage of such data within China while allowing foreign entities to access it [3][4] - Specific thresholds for data export require reporting, such as providing personal information to over 1 million individuals or sensitive information to over 10,000 individuals [4] Group 3: Exemption Scenarios - Nine categories of exemption scenarios are proposed, with six aligning with previous regulations, including contract fulfillment and emergency management for human resources [4][5] - Three new exemption scenarios include reporting security vulnerabilities, handling security incidents, and addressing product defects [5] Group 4: Important Data Types - The guidelines specify six major business scenarios where important data types must be reported for security assessment, including research and design, production, automated driving, software upgrades, and connected operations [6][7] - Important data types include driving automation algorithms, real-time vehicle data, and location tracking data, with specific criteria for classification [7][8] Group 5: Security Protection Requirements - Automotive data processors are required to appoint a data export security officer and establish internal approval mechanisms for data export activities [9] - The guidelines mandate the use of security technologies to ensure data confidentiality and integrity during transmission, along with logging and monitoring requirements for data export activities [9]