Workflow
数据财产权
icon
Search documents
以中国民法学自主知识体系构建保障民法典全面有效实施
Xin Lang Cai Jing· 2026-01-02 17:26
王利明 □2025年是民法典实施的第五年。广大民法学者以习近平法治思想为指导,面向市场经济、面向科技发 展、面向司法实践,提出了许多富有建设性的学术观点,有力推动了中国民法学自主知识体系的构建, 为全面有效实施民法典提供理论支撑。 □民法典颁布后,我国民法学研究从立法论时代迈向解释论时代,法学方法论研究的重要性日益凸显, 并成为民法学研究的重要课题。中国应构建自主的法释义学体系,以服务于立法与司法实践。 □"十五五"规划建议强调,"坚持和落实'两个毫不动摇',促进各种所有制经济优势互补、共同发 展。""依法保障人身权、财产权、人格权,健全规范涉企执法长效机制,防止和纠正违规异地执法、趋 利性执法。"这必将为民法典的全面有效实施和民法的发展、完善提出新的要求,注入新的动力。 2025年是民法典实施的第五年。在过去一年中,民法典实施中出现的新情况、新问题急需回应,大数 据、人工智能的发展迫切需要依法治理,高水平市场经济体制的构建需要法治充分保障。广大民法学者 以习近平法治思想为指导,面向市场经济、面向科技发展、面向司法实践,提出了许多富有建设性的学 术观点,有力推动了中国民法学自主知识体系的构建,为全面有效实施民 ...
专家观点:数据共享中的数据再利用规则
3 6 Ke· 2025-12-03 02:27
Core Viewpoint - The Supreme People's Court has established systematic adjudication rules for data rights disputes, affirming the legality of data transfer through associated account services with user authorization, as highlighted in Guiding Case No. 263 [1][2]. Group 1: Necessity and Legitimacy of Data Sharing - Data sharing is essential as it allows data collectors to share their collected data, forming a contractual relationship between collectors and sharers, with low marginal costs for sharing [3]. - The shift from a property-centric view to a utilization-centric view emphasizes the importance of data sharing for maximizing its value [3]. - Associated account services exemplify data sharing, reducing user management burdens and enabling timely updates and comparative analysis of information [3][4]. Group 2: Benefits of Open Interface Data Sharing - Open interface data sharing facilitates unified management of multiple accounts, reducing the costs associated with frequent registrations and platform management [4][5]. - The convenience of one-click login features, such as WeChat's, significantly enhances user experience by simplifying the login process [5]. - Data sharing aligns with national policies aimed at promoting efficient data circulation and empowering the real economy [6]. Group 3: Market Competition and Service Quality - Open interface data sharing can enhance market competition and service quality, countering the misconception that it reinforces platform monopolies [7]. - The ability to transfer data freely encourages platforms to improve their services, thereby benefiting users and fostering a competitive environment [7]. Group 4: Data Rights and Limitations - Data rights for recipients depend on user authorization, with the need for clear agreements between data providers and recipients [9][10]. - Data recipients must not infringe on the rights of data sources, and their use of data must align with the original purpose for which it was authorized [14][15]. - The transfer of data must not disrupt the normal operations of associated platforms or violate commercial ethics, as established in Guiding Case No. 263 [16]. Group 5: Conclusion on Data Value - The value of data lies in its shared circulation rather than exclusive acquisition, necessitating the exploration of rules that protect user rights while enabling data sharing to activate its full potential [17].