Core Viewpoint - The discussion around "sterile eggs" has gained significant attention, with experts suggesting that the term is misleading as these eggs are better described as "low-bacteria eggs" [1][4]. Group 1: Understanding Sterile Eggs - "Sterile eggs" are actually "low-bacteria eggs," which undergo pasteurization and strict processing, resulting in very low bacterial content but not complete sterility [4]. - Salmonella, a common foodborne pathogen, can enter eggs through infected hens or from feces and soil, as the eggshell is porous [5]. - The production of low-bacteria eggs involves over 20 processes and multiple quality checks to ensure minimal microbial presence [5]. Group 2: Nutritional Comparison - Low-bacteria eggs are priced significantly higher, sometimes 3 to 4 times that of regular eggs, attracting consumers due to claims of being "sterile," having no fishy taste, and being more nutritious [6]. - The taste and color of egg yolks are influenced by the chicken's diet rather than the egg's sterility, with specific feed affecting the presence of fishy flavors and yolk color [7][9]. - Nutritional claims about low-bacteria eggs, such as higher organic selenium and vitamins, are not exclusive to them, as regular eggs also contain these nutrients [10][11]. Group 3: Consumption Recommendations - Cooking eggs enhances protein absorption, with boiled eggs allowing for 91% protein absorption compared to only 55% when consumed raw [11]. - While low-bacteria eggs can be consumed raw, they should be eaten within 7 to 10 days of production for safety, after which cooking is recommended [12]. Group 4: Egg Selection Tips - Consumers are advised to check the production date, listen for sounds when shaking the egg, and inspect the shell for cleanliness and cracks when selecting eggs [13][14][15].

Core Viewpoint - The recent detection of antibiotic residues in "antibiotic-free" eggs sold by Hema has sparked significant consumer anxiety regarding food safety, raising questions about the reliability of such labels in the market [1][3][14]. Group 1: Incident Overview - On May 8, the Shandong Provincial Market Supervision Administration announced that a batch of "antibiotic-free" eggs from Hema was found to contain excessive levels of veterinary drug residues, including banned substances [1][3]. - The specific antibiotics detected were dimetridazole and trimethoprim, with the latter exceeding the maximum residue limit set by national standards [5][14]. - The affected eggs were sold by Qingdao Hema Network Technology Co., Ltd. and sourced from Xiaochi Egg Industry (Shandong) Co., Ltd. [3][5]. Group 2: Consumer Reaction - Consumers expressed disbelief and anger upon discovering that the "antibiotic-free" eggs they had been purchasing for years were not safe, leading to a surge in refund requests [9][10]. - Social media platforms saw a rapid increase in discussions and tutorials on how to obtain refunds for the affected eggs, highlighting the urgency of the situation [9][10]. Group 3: Market Implications - The incident has led to a broader trust crisis in the market for "antibiotic-free" eggs, with consumers questioning the safety of all egg products [14][19]. - The concept of "antibiotic-free" eggs emerged in response to public concerns over antibiotic residues in food, but the lack of a unified national standard for such products has created confusion [19][22]. - The price of "antibiotic-free" eggs is significantly higher than regular eggs, with some consumers now questioning whether the premium is justified given the recent findings [23][25]. Group 4: Industry Standards and Practices - The absence of clear and consistent standards for "antibiotic-free" labeling allows for varying interpretations among producers, leading to potential consumer deception [19][22]. - The incident has prompted discussions about the need for stricter regulations and clearer definitions regarding what constitutes "antibiotic-free" products in the market [19][22]. - The reliance on self-regulation by companies, such as the claims made by producers about their products, raises concerns about accountability and consumer safety [19][22].