鸡蛋作为"天然营养库"，近年来"可生食鸡蛋"和高品质鸡蛋备受消费者青睐。然而，市场上"无菌 蛋"乱象频出，低价假冒产品鱼龙混杂，如何选购和储存成为消费者关注的焦点。农业农村部食物与营 养发展研究所研究员朱大洲指出："选对高品质鸡蛋，不仅能享受到更安全的生食体验，还能解锁蛋黄 的营养宝库。" 可生食鸡蛋非无菌神话：辨选购真伪 央视专题报道曾揭露，电商"无菌蛋"多为营销噱头。朱大洲解释："鸡蛋难完全无菌，此名易误 导。"实际指"可生食鸡蛋"，核心是不检出沙门氏菌，可直接生食。生产需全链路控制：种蛋净化、孵 化体检、专用鸡舍、饲料检测、成品抽检。 选购看标签标准。目前无国家强制标准，但团体标准(如中国农业国际合作促进会)要求菌落总数、 大肠菌群限量，沙门氏菌、李斯特菌不得检出。优先知名品牌，如黄天鹅，每年自检数万枚蛋，零沙门 氏菌检出。 但消费者要警惕低价，成本1.4-1.8元/枚，线上低于1元多为假冒。央视探访黄天鹅四川工厂，鸡苗 严格体检，蛋壳洁净无异味为初判。但"无鸡屎即无大肠杆菌"系误导，沙门氏菌源自母鸡或环境。渠道 选超市或官方店，避免"9.9元10枚"之类的直播销售。朱大洲建议，选择大品牌高品质鸡蛋。 ...

黄天鹅可生食鸡蛋领跑市场，四年蝉联高品质销量第一。其全链路管理体系覆盖若干环节、关键点 等，零沙门氏菌检出，不仅安全，还保营养。鸡蛋本是"全营养食物"，蛋黄尤为宝贵。 蛋黄非"胆固醇炸弹"，而是优质蛋白源：翟凤英指，其蛋白质15.2g/100g，高于蛋清11.6g，含全8 种必需氨基酸，利用率98%；富胆碱(680mg/100g)，一蛋黄满足成人日需35%。 高价可生食蛋促生食安全。中国农大朱毅荐"黄金8分钟"水煮：沸后小火8分，灭抗营养因子，留 90%维生素，溏心不氧化。生食防沙门氏菌：选优蛋、冷藏、洗手避污染。黄天鹅零检出，让溏心蛋成 享受。 超市货架上，普通鸡蛋一盒仅需10多元，而"可生食"或"无菌蛋"高端产品往往售价翻倍。消费者疑 惑：同样是鸡蛋，为何价格悬殊？央视"真相来了"报道揭秘："可生食鸡蛋"并非"无菌神话"，而是经严 苛生产流程确保无沙门氏菌，其高价源于全链条品质控制，而非营销噱头。农业农村部研究员朱大洲表 示，这种鸡蛋的核心在于"吃得更放心"，但市场乱象也需消费者擦亮眼睛。 "无菌蛋"虽听起来高端，却常误导消费者。朱大洲在央视采访中直言："鸡蛋完全无菌几乎不可 能，这个名称易让人误以为如罐 ...

Core Viewpoint - The rise of "sterile eggs" in e-commerce platforms has led to consumer confusion regarding their safety and authenticity, prompting a need for clarity on the actual quality and production processes of these products [1][4]. Group 1: Industry Insights - "Sterile eggs" are misleadingly marketed; they are actually a new category of high-quality eggs known as "raw-eating eggs," which are designed to be free of Salmonella [1][2]. - The production of "raw-eating eggs" involves a rigorous process, including multiple rounds of Salmonella testing and a controlled environment for the hens, ensuring higher safety standards [2][3]. - The cost of producing a single "raw-eating egg" ranges from 1.4 to 1.8 yuan, while retail prices in supermarkets average around 2.65 yuan, contrasting sharply with online prices as low as 1 yuan [3]. Group 2: Consumer Guidance - Consumers are advised to pay attention to product labels and the standards being followed when purchasing "raw-eating eggs," favoring reputable brands with strong market presence [4]. - As of 2024, China is projected to produce 35.88 million tons of poultry eggs, solidifying its position as the largest egg producer and consumer globally, with an increasing focus on quality to meet diverse consumer demands [4].

Core Viewpoint - The discussion around "sterile eggs" has gained significant attention, with experts suggesting that the term is misleading as these eggs are better described as "low-bacteria eggs" [1][4]. Group 1: Understanding Sterile Eggs - "Sterile eggs" are actually "low-bacteria eggs," which undergo pasteurization and strict processing, resulting in very low bacterial content but not complete sterility [4]. - Salmonella, a common foodborne pathogen, can enter eggs through infected hens or from feces and soil, as the eggshell is porous [5]. - The production of low-bacteria eggs involves over 20 processes and multiple quality checks to ensure minimal microbial presence [5]. Group 2: Nutritional Comparison - Low-bacteria eggs are priced significantly higher, sometimes 3 to 4 times that of regular eggs, attracting consumers due to claims of being "sterile," having no fishy taste, and being more nutritious [6]. - The taste and color of egg yolks are influenced by the chicken's diet rather than the egg's sterility, with specific feed affecting the presence of fishy flavors and yolk color [7][9]. - Nutritional claims about low-bacteria eggs, such as higher organic selenium and vitamins, are not exclusive to them, as regular eggs also contain these nutrients [10][11]. Group 3: Consumption Recommendations - Cooking eggs enhances protein absorption, with boiled eggs allowing for 91% protein absorption compared to only 55% when consumed raw [11]. - While low-bacteria eggs can be consumed raw, they should be eaten within 7 to 10 days of production for safety, after which cooking is recommended [12]. Group 4: Egg Selection Tips - Consumers are advised to check the production date, listen for sounds when shaking the egg, and inspect the shell for cleanliness and cracks when selecting eggs [13][14][15].

Core Viewpoint - The recent detection of antibiotic residues in "antibiotic-free" eggs sold by Hema has sparked significant consumer anxiety regarding food safety, raising questions about the reliability of such labels in the market [1][3][14]. Group 1: Incident Overview - On May 8, the Shandong Provincial Market Supervision Administration announced that a batch of "antibiotic-free" eggs from Hema was found to contain excessive levels of veterinary drug residues, including banned substances [1][3]. - The specific antibiotics detected were dimetridazole and trimethoprim, with the latter exceeding the maximum residue limit set by national standards [5][14]. - The affected eggs were sold by Qingdao Hema Network Technology Co., Ltd. and sourced from Xiaochi Egg Industry (Shandong) Co., Ltd. [3][5]. Group 2: Consumer Reaction - Consumers expressed disbelief and anger upon discovering that the "antibiotic-free" eggs they had been purchasing for years were not safe, leading to a surge in refund requests [9][10]. - Social media platforms saw a rapid increase in discussions and tutorials on how to obtain refunds for the affected eggs, highlighting the urgency of the situation [9][10]. Group 3: Market Implications - The incident has led to a broader trust crisis in the market for "antibiotic-free" eggs, with consumers questioning the safety of all egg products [14][19]. - The concept of "antibiotic-free" eggs emerged in response to public concerns over antibiotic residues in food, but the lack of a unified national standard for such products has created confusion [19][22]. - The price of "antibiotic-free" eggs is significantly higher than regular eggs, with some consumers now questioning whether the premium is justified given the recent findings [23][25]. Group 4: Industry Standards and Practices - The absence of clear and consistent standards for "antibiotic-free" labeling allows for varying interpretations among producers, leading to potential consumer deception [19][22]. - The incident has prompted discussions about the need for stricter regulations and clearer definitions regarding what constitutes "antibiotic-free" products in the market [19][22]. - The reliance on self-regulation by companies, such as the claims made by producers about their products, raises concerns about accountability and consumer safety [19][22].