Workflow
未成年人模式
icon
Search documents
豆包上线未成年人模式! 默认关闭相关视频展示
Xin Lang Ke Ji· 2025-08-26 07:16
责任编辑:何俊熹 < 3 未成年人模式 未成年人模式是为家长提供的工具,以方便关闭部分 功能,防止小朋友拿到设备后可能的不适当使用。 A 未成年人模式 0 和豆包以外的智能体对话 回答展示相关视频 C # 浏览第三方网页 E Al 创作 新浪科技讯 8月26日下午消息,近日,豆包App已正式上线未成年人模式。据悉,在该模式下,回答展 示视频、浏览第三方网页、与豆包以外的智能体对话及AI创作等功能将默认关闭。而翻译、资料查询 与深入研究等学习与工作相关能力仍可正常使用。 豆包未成年人模式需家长设置密码,如退出或切换仍需二次输入密码确认,避免未成年人绕过设置。 此前,有部分网友反馈称因豆包会在问答结果中提供相应短视频作为参考,部分儿童可能借此浏览视频 内容,分散注意力。记者实测发现,未成年人模式开启后,问答中不再有任何短视频相关内容展示或推 荐。此外,用户也无法与豆包主bot外的其他智能体对话。 大模型产品作为新兴业态,在青少年数字生活保护上仍有很大探索空间。豆包方面表示,将持续优化未 成年人模式的体验,帮助大小朋友安心使用AI。(罗宁) ...
让未成年人模式“安全锁”不再沦为摆设
Bei Jing Qing Nian Bao· 2025-07-15 06:48
Core Viewpoint - The current measures to protect minors online are ineffective, as children can easily bypass restrictions set by the "minor mode" through various methods, highlighting the urgent need for stronger security measures [1][3]. Group 1: Issues with Current Measures - The failure of the minor mode is attributed to lax and superficial real-name authentication, allowing children to circumvent restrictions using relatives' ID information [3]. - Simple actions like uninstalling and reinstalling apps can easily break the minor mode, indicating significant vulnerabilities in the technical defenses [3]. - The absence of a robust multi-verification mechanism allows payment actions to proceed without risk warnings, further undermining the effectiveness of the minor mode [3]. Group 2: Emergence of a Grey Market - A complete grey market has emerged around the circumvention of minor mode restrictions, with services openly advertising account rentals without face verification [3]. - The presence of ads for account cracking on social platforms and the use of covert methods to bypass restrictions illustrate the challenges faced by regulatory bodies [3]. Group 3: Recommendations for Improvement - A collaborative effort is required to enhance online protection for minors, with platforms needing to address basic vulnerabilities and monitor communities for potential cracking transactions [3]. - Regulatory bodies should enforce the "Minor Network Protection Regulations" strictly, holding platforms accountable for lax protections and conducting special rectification efforts to dismantle grey market activities [3]. Group 4: Content Quality and Parental Role - The current content pool for the minor mode is criticized for being simplistic and not meeting the diverse needs of youth, necessitating an expansion of quality content [4][5]. - Platforms should implement a "whitelist" mechanism to collaborate with authoritative organizations and quality creators to enrich content suitable for various age groups [5]. - Parents play a crucial role in safeguarding their children online, needing to set a good example and actively engage in their children's internet usage to reinforce the protective measures [5].
谁解除了孩子的未成年人模式?(金台视线)
Ren Min Ri Bao· 2025-07-13 22:20
Core Points - The article highlights the challenges in enforcing the minor mode in mobile applications, as children find ways to bypass restrictions set by parents and authorities [2][3][4] - There is a significant gap in the effectiveness of the minor mode across different platforms, with many loopholes that allow minors to circumvent protections [5][6] - The existence of gray market services that facilitate the bypassing of minor mode restrictions raises concerns about the safety and well-being of minors online [7][8][9] Group 1: Implementation Challenges - Parents are struggling to maintain control over their children's online activities despite setting up minor modes, as children can easily find workarounds [2][3] - The minor mode's implementation varies significantly across platforms, leading to inconsistent protection levels [4][5] - Many applications have low barriers for bypassing minor mode, allowing children to exploit these weaknesses with minimal effort [6][7] Group 2: Financial Risks - There are reports of children making significant in-game purchases without parental consent, highlighting the financial risks associated with inadequate protections [3][6] - Some platforms do not have robust identity verification processes, enabling minors to use their parents' accounts for unauthorized transactions [3][4] Group 3: Gray Market Exploitation - A gray market has emerged where services are offered to bypass minor mode restrictions, including account rentals and identity verification circumvention [7][8] - These services often advertise low-cost solutions to bypass restrictions, making it easy for minors to access restricted content [9][10] - The presence of these services undermines the intended protections of the minor mode, creating a risky environment for young users [10][11] Group 4: Recommendations for Improvement - Experts suggest that platforms need to enhance their minor mode features and conduct self-assessments to close loopholes [11][12] - There is a call for stricter identity verification methods, including multi-factor authentication, to prevent unauthorized access [11][12] - A collaborative approach involving families, schools, and government is necessary to create a safer online environment for minors [11][12]
“小网民”需要“大保护”(“融”观中国)
Core Viewpoint - The article highlights the increasing concerns regarding online safety for minors as they return to school after summer, emphasizing the need for improved measures to protect them from harmful online content and risks associated with new technologies [3][4]. Group 1: Online Risks for Minors - The article discusses various online risks faced by minors, including exposure to inappropriate content, addiction to online games, cyberbullying, personal information leakage, and irrational consumption [7][8]. - A significant statistic is presented, indicating that nearly 98% of school-age minors in China are online users, making them particularly vulnerable to these risks [5]. Group 2: Parental Concerns and Responses - Parents are increasingly worried about their children's online activities, with many expressing anxiety over the use of AI chat applications that expose minors to suggestive content [5][6]. - The article notes that many parents resort to strict measures to limit their children's internet access, which can lead to conflicts and dissatisfaction among minors [6]. Group 3: Regulatory Measures and Technological Solutions - The Central Cyberspace Administration of China has initiated a series of actions aimed at cleaning up the online environment for minors, focusing on the regulation of harmful content and the enhancement of protective measures [4]. - The introduction of a "Minor Mode" is highlighted as a significant step towards better online protection, allowing parents to manage their children's online activities more effectively [9][10]. Group 4: Legal and Judicial Aspects - The article mentions the establishment of a juvenile internet court in Beijing, which has handled over 1,200 cases related to online disputes involving minors, indicating a growing trend in such legal issues [12]. - It emphasizes the need for clear responsibility allocation among platforms, guardians, and minors in cases of online disputes, with courts considering the actions taken by minors to bypass restrictions [11][13]. Group 5: Future Directions and Recommendations - Experts suggest a multi-faceted approach to address online addiction and safety issues, involving families, schools, communities, and judicial systems [15]. - Recommendations include enhancing parental involvement, providing legal education, and creating offline recreational spaces for minors to reduce their reliance on the internet [15].
13岁男孩玩蛋仔派对当"榜一大哥" 平台表示会退费处理
Zhong Guo Jing Ji Wang· 2025-05-09 08:05
Group 1 - The article highlights a case where a 13-year-old boy spent a total of 120,000 yuan (approximately 17,000 USD) on live streaming gifts, raising concerns about minors' spending in online environments [1] - The father of the boy reported that his son was encouraged by a live streamer to spend money on gifts in order to play games with him, indicating potential exploitation of minors by content creators [1] - The live streaming platform acknowledged the situation and stated that they would process a refund for the amount spent by the minor, which reflects the platform's responsibility in handling such cases [1] Group 2 - Legal frameworks are in place to protect minors from unauthorized spending on online platforms, as outlined in the Supreme Court's guidance on civil cases related to the COVID-19 pandemic [2] - The "Guidelines for the Construction of Minor Modes in Mobile Internet" aim to enhance the safety of minors online by expanding protective measures across various platforms and devices [2] - The Civil Code of the People's Republic of China specifies the legal capacity of minors, indicating that those over eight years old have limited civil capacity and require parental consent for financial transactions [2]
禁言、关闭!这些账号,从严处置→
证券时报· 2025-04-20 00:12
Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes the ongoing efforts by the internet regulatory authorities to strengthen the protection of minors online, highlighting the negative impacts of inappropriate content and the need for stricter measures against violations [1][4]. Group 1: Regulatory Actions - The internet regulatory department has intensified the enforcement of responsibilities on platforms, leading to the identification and punishment of over 11,000 violating accounts through measures such as banning, revoking profit permissions, and account closures [4]. - New trends have emerged where some accounts disguise themselves as minors by using childlike appearances, adding "student" tags, and locating school addresses to publish harmful content, prompting the authorities to take stricter actions [4]. Group 2: Types of Violations - Common issues include the use of props to create shocking scenarios involving children, such as pretending to harm them, and engaging in inappropriate "punishment education" [5]. - Some accounts are staging fake family conflicts and encouraging minors to imitate adult behaviors like smoking, which distorts their understanding of appropriate conduct [5]. - There are instances of minors showcasing luxury items and large sums of cash in videos, promoting a culture of wealth display and potentially dangerous behavior [5]. - Certain accounts are using misleading tactics to sell customized images and promote lowbrow content through private interactions, circumventing regulatory scrutiny [5].