（来源：南湖晚报） 转自：南湖晚报 N晚报记者 韩瑜超 通讯员 王 晨 燃放爆竹可以烘托喜庆氛围，但有时也会惹祸。近日，南湖法院就审结了一起因儿童燃放鞭炮引起的财 产损害纠纷案件，依法判决"熊孩子"的监护人赔偿车主车辆损失2.37万元。 鞭炮闯祸： 车辆无辜"破相"，家长拒绝赔偿 2024年10月，陆先生像往常一样将爱车停放在某停车场。当他再次准备用车时，眼前的一幕让他心痛又 气愤：车辆的前后车门、车窗甚至天窗上，遍布着鞭炮灼烫后留下的伤痕，他立即选择了报警。 警方介入调查后，真相很快浮出水面。监控画面显示，事发当天，9岁的小明（化名）和6岁的小禹（化 名）手中拿着鞭炮在停车场内玩耍。后来，两个孩子竟手持鞭炮对着陆先生的车直接燃放，鞭炮四溅的 火星导致车辆多处漆面及部件受损。 经专业机构评估，车辆维修费用高达4.64万元，陆先生还为此支付了1000元评估费。事发后，小禹的家 长先行承担了50%的责任，向陆先生支付了包括评估费在内的2.37万元。然而，小明的家长却对赔偿事 宜提出了异议。 法庭交锋： 监护责任无可推卸，判决生效警醒世人 庭审中，小明的父亲辩称，家中并无烟花爆竹，自己也从未给孩子购买过，连打火机都 ...

Core Viewpoint - The court ruling against two minors for their inappropriate behavior at a Haidilao hotpot restaurant highlights the legal responsibilities of guardians and the serious consequences of juvenile misconduct, resulting in a total compensation of 2.2 million yuan [1][2][4]. Group 1: Legal Implications - The court found that the minors' actions were intentional and malicious, leading to significant social harm and financial loss for the restaurant [2][4]. - Guardians are legally responsible for the actions of their minors, and failure to fulfill this duty can result in substantial financial penalties [3][5]. - The ruling emphasizes that administrative penalties, such as detention, do not exempt individuals from civil liabilities [4]. Group 2: Financial Consequences - The total compensation of 2.2 million yuan includes costs for damaged utensils, cleaning, operational losses, and damage to reputation, reflecting the serious impact of the minors' actions on the business [1][4]. - The high compensation amount serves as a warning to guardians about the importance of proper supervision and education of their children [3][5]. - The ruling reinforces the notion that the legal system aims to protect the business environment and ensure justice for affected parties [4].