尤其是鲁比奥那句话：对于我们美国人来说，我们的家可能在西半球，但我们永远是欧洲的孩子。 慕尼黑安全会议，美国国务卿鲁比奥演讲完，全场热烈掌声，很多人站起来鼓掌。 第一感觉：欧洲人又被美国忽悠了。 还有，万斯更里外不是人了，鲁比奥成了你最大的竞争对手。 因为很简单，去年万斯去参加的慕尼黑安全会议，今年是鲁比奥，两人讲话，其实换汤不换药，都是特 朗普政府的主张；但结果，万斯你让欧洲人都讨厌，鲁比奥却让欧洲人感觉很良好。 言语的柔软，有时比行动的坚硬更具欺骗性。 很多欧洲人感动得稀里哗啦。 很多人总是愿意相信他们渴望听到的，哪怕那只是镜花水月。 为佐证欧美的特殊关系，鲁比奥还举了大量例子，他说： 我们的故事始于一位意大利探险家，他冒险进入蛮荒，发现一个新的世界，将基督教带到美洲，并成为 定义我们先驱国家想象力的传奇。 我们的第一个殖民地是由英国定居者建立的，不仅流传下我们所说 的语言，还奠定了整个政治和法律体系。 我们的边界是由苏格兰-爱尔兰人塑造的，这个来自阿尔斯特山上的骄傲、坚强的家族给了我们戴维·克 罗克特、马克·吐温、泰迪·罗斯福和尼尔·阿姆斯特朗。 我们伟大的中西部中心地带是由德国农民和工匠 建造的，他们 ...

法 国总统 马克龙 据报道，马克龙说，"我认为，虽然危机过了最紧张节点，出现缓和迹象，但不应放松警惕，以为风暴 已过。事实并非如此，因为当前局势已陷入永久性动荡。" 他说，欧洲当前面对的是一个"公开反欧"、"蔑视欧盟"且"企图瓦解欧盟"的特朗普政府。"当遭遇明确 的侵略性行为时，我认为我们不应低头屈服或寻求妥协。这种策略我们已经尝试了数月，但毫无成 效。"马克龙说道。 马克龙警告，近期围绕格陵兰岛的危机尚未结束，而且欧盟还可能在近期因科技企业监管问题与特朗普 政府发生冲突。《金融时报》称，欧盟在数据隐私、仇恨言论和网络产业征税方面实施更严格的规则， 美国一直对此感到强烈不满。马克龙说，美国可能对计划禁止儿童使用美国社交媒体平台的欧盟国家采 取报复性措施，这将成为欧盟面临的考验。 责任编辑：何俊熹 据英国《金融时报》2月10日报道，法国总统马克龙在接受媒体采访时表示，对于美国总统特朗普日前 就格陵兰岛等问题发出的威胁，欧盟不应产生"虚假的安全感"，认为与美国的紧张关系已经解除。马克 龙认为，面对特朗普时欧盟不应屈服或寻求妥协，这种策略已被证明行不通。 法 据英国《金融时报》2月10日报道，法国总统马克龙在接受媒 ...

【环球网报道】据英国《金融时报》2月10日报道，法国总统马克龙在接受媒体采访时表示，对于美国 总统特朗普日前就格陵兰岛等问题发出的威胁，欧盟不应产生"虚假的安全感"，认为与美国的紧张关系 已经解除。马克龙认为，面对特朗普时欧盟不应屈服或寻求妥协，这种策略已被证明行不通。 据报道，马克龙说，"我认为，虽然危机过了最紧张节点，出现缓和迹象，但不应放松警惕，以为风暴 已过。事实并非如此，因为当前局势已陷入永久性动荡。" 他说，欧洲当前面对的是一个"公开反欧"、"蔑视欧盟"且"企图瓦解欧盟"的特朗普政府。"当遭遇明确 的侵略性行为时，我认为我们不应低头屈服或寻求妥协。这种策略我们已经尝试了数月，但毫无成 效。"马克龙说道。 马克龙警告，近期围绕格陵兰岛的危机尚未结束，而且欧盟还可能在近期因科技企业监管问题与特朗普 政府发生冲突。《金融时报》称，欧盟在数据隐私、仇恨言论和网络产业征税方面实施更严格的规则， 美国一直对此感到强烈不满。马克龙说，美国可能对计划禁止儿童使用美国社交媒体平台的欧盟国家采 取报复性措施，这将成为欧盟面临的考验。 ...

Core Viewpoint - The article highlights German Chancellor Merz's emphasis on the need for Europe to exhibit new confidence in the face of a changing global order, advocating for independent security, enhanced competitiveness, and unity within Europe [1] Group 1: European Security and Competitiveness - Merz stated that Germany does not intend to politically submit to the United States, emphasizing that the relationship between Germany and the U.S. is one of partnership and alliance, not a subordinate relationship [1] - He called for strengthening NATO's capabilities within Europe, indicating a push for greater military cooperation and readiness among European nations [1] - A special EU summit is scheduled for February, focusing on how the EU can regain its competitiveness in the global market [1] Group 2: Criticism of U.S. Statements - Merz criticized U.S. remarks regarding allies' roles in the Afghanistan war, asserting that Germany will not allow its soldiers to be disrespected or disparaged [1]

Core Viewpoint - Europe is unable to independently support Ukraine amidst the ongoing crisis, relying heavily on Western allies, particularly the United States, for military and financial assistance [1] Military Support - The U.S. provides over one-third of Western aid to Ukraine, including advanced weaponry and intelligence support, which Europe cannot match due to its limited military production capabilities [1] - France's President Macron stated that Europe has contributed everything possible but cannot provide what it does not have, highlighting the limitations of European military support [1] Financial Assistance - Since February 2022, the EU and its 27 member states have mobilized approximately €177.5 billion in financial support for Ukraine, with military aid amounting to around €63-65 billion [1] - The total financial outlay by the EU for Ukraine over the past three and a half years is nearly €390 billion, averaging about €110 billion annually, which is less than 0.7% of the EU's annual GDP of €17.9 trillion [1] Economic Impact - The ongoing crisis has severely impacted Europe's economic competitiveness, with Germany experiencing two consecutive years of economic contraction and France facing frequent changes in leadership due to budget issues [1] - The EU's sanctions against Russia have led to a significant reduction in economic ties, which has further strained European economies [1] Internal Divisions - Disagreements within the EU regarding support for Ukraine are increasing, with some member states refusing to share the financial burden of aid [1] - The EU's recent attempts to utilize frozen Russian assets for Ukrainian aid have faced resistance, indicating a growing reluctance among member states to continue funding the crisis [1] Future of Ukraine in the EU - The EU is accelerating Ukraine's accession process, with potential membership discussions expected to conclude by the end of 2028, but this raises concerns about the implications for EU governance and resource allocation [1] - Central and Eastern European countries express reservations about Ukraine's membership, fearing it could dilute their influence and complicate EU dynamics [1] Military Deployment Discussions - Major European powers have shown reluctance to commit troops to Ukraine, with Poland and France both indicating they will not participate in military deployments [1] - Security concerns from Baltic states further complicate the trust in larger European nations regarding their commitment to Ukraine [1] Long-term Support Concerns - If Ukraine loses its ability to resist Russia and faces economic challenges, European support may diminish, potentially leading to Ukraine becoming a burden on the EU integration process [1]

Core Viewpoint - The relationship between the US and Europe is at its lowest point since NATO's founding, driven by the US's destructive diplomatic practices, prompting allies to reassess transatlantic relations [1] Group 1: Shifts in US-Europe Relations - The current state of US-Europe relations is increasingly driven by interests rather than shared democratic values, marking a "breakage phase" in their traditional partnership [1] - The Greenland dispute has shaken European leaders' and the public's confidence in the US [1] Group 2: Defense and Sovereignty - In the defense sector, European leaders are accelerating efforts to promote "European sovereignty" amid pressure from the Trump administration regarding defense spending [1] - Barroso suggests that if NATO is to be preserved, it will need to become more Europeanized, emphasizing that Europe should not solely rely on the US and should prioritize strengthening its own defense capabilities [1]

Core Viewpoint - Belgium's Prime Minister De Wever emphasizes that Europe must confront the United States over its excessive tolerance and reliance, indicating a critical juncture for transatlantic relations [1][3] Group 1: European Dependence on the U.S. - Europe has been overly accommodating towards the U.S., particularly under the new presidential administration, leading to a precarious situation [1] - The Prime Minister suggests that Europe has reached a point where it must choose between maintaining dignity and continuing as a subordinate to the U.S. [1] Group 2: Potential Consequences of U.S.-Europe Relations - De Wever warns that if the current trajectory continues, the longstanding transatlantic relationship, which has lasted for 80 years, could come to an end [3] - The upcoming meeting between De Wever and President Trump is expected to convey a strong message about crossing red lines, emphasizing the need for a decisive stance [3]

Group 1 - The core viewpoint expressed by Belgian Prime Minister De Wever is that Europe is at a critical juncture where it must decide whether to continue its dependency on the United States or to assert its own dignity and independence [1][3] - De Wever emphasizes that Europe has been overly tolerant towards the U.S. and that numerous red lines have been crossed, indicating a need for a shift in approach [1] - The upcoming meeting between De Wever and U.S. President Trump is expected to convey a strong message that the transatlantic relationship could end if the current trajectory continues, marking a potential end to 80 years of cooperation [3]

Core Viewpoint - The article highlights a significant shift in European leaders' perception of the United States as an unreliable trade partner and security ally, prompting calls for strong countermeasures from Europe against U.S. provocations [3]. Group 1 - Several unnamed European diplomats have described the recent policy shift of the U.S. as "madness" and "out of control," indicating a growing concern over U.S. actions that threaten European interests [3]. - High-ranking European officials, including leaders from the UK, France, Germany, the EU, Finland, and Italy, have been communicating regularly in a group chat to coordinate responses to actions by the U.S. that may harm European interests [3].

Core Viewpoint - The statement by Belgian Prime Minister De Wever at the World Economic Forum highlights the growing rift between the US and Europe over the issue of Greenland, emphasizing that the EU is at a crossroads regarding its unity under US pressure or the risk of division [1] Group 1 - De Wever indicated that the EU's previous tolerance towards the US was due to its dependency, but now the "red line" is being crossed [1] - He contrasted the situation of being a "happy vassal" with that of being a "miserable slave," suggesting a significant shift in the EU's stance towards the US [1]