Core Points - The Schengen Area, established in 1985, now includes 29 member countries and covers a population of 450 million, facilitating free movement of people and goods across borders [1][4] - Recent challenges, including the refugee crisis, have led to temporary border controls in 12 Schengen countries, raising concerns about the future of the Schengen Agreement [1][5] Group 1: Historical Context - The Schengen Agreement was signed in Luxembourg by five countries, aiming to eliminate internal border checks and promote European integration [2][3] - The Schengen Museum commemorates this history, showcasing artifacts and narratives that highlight the significance of cross-border cooperation and trust [2][3] Group 2: Current Operations - The Schengen Area is the largest borderless region globally, with nearly 70% of European countries participating, allowing for approximately 2 million cross-border commuters daily [4] - Member countries collaborate in various sectors, including education and healthcare, demonstrating the benefits of integration despite facing security challenges [4] Group 3: Challenges and Responses - Temporary border controls have become more common, with 12 out of 29 Schengen countries implementing such measures since the 2015 refugee crisis [5][6] - The European Commission warns that if internal border checks become permanent, it could lead to significant economic losses, estimated at €470 billion over ten years [6] Group 4: Future Outlook - Bulgaria and Romania are set to join the Schengen Area in January 2025, marking a significant expansion and reflecting the ongoing appeal of the Schengen system [7] - The EU aims to enhance governance and operational management of the Schengen Area, focusing on digitalization and cooperation among law enforcement agencies to address current challenges [8]

Core Points - The year marks the 50th anniversary of China-Europe diplomatic relations, emphasizing the importance of cooperation and partnership between the two regions [1] - China maintains a stable and continuous policy towards Europe, supporting European integration and strategic autonomy, regardless of the international situation [2] - China contributes approximately 30% to global economic growth annually, highlighting its role as a stabilizing force in the world [2] Group 1 - The trade volume between China and Europe now equals the total trade volume of previous years, indicating significant growth in their economic relationship [1] - The relationship is characterized by a commitment to partnership, cooperation, autonomy, and mutual benefits, aiming for a more resilient and mature future [1] - There are attempts to undermine China-Europe relations, but the overall trajectory is towards continued progress and stability [2] Group 2 - China positions itself as a key stabilizing force in the current chaotic international landscape, advocating for dialogue and political solutions to disputes [2] - The country emphasizes its commitment to non-interference in internal affairs and the protection of the rights of developing countries [2] - China expresses a willingness to collaborate with European nations to share opportunities and address global challenges together [3]

Core Points - The Schengen Agreement, established 40 years ago, is facing a crisis as at least 11 member countries have temporarily reinstated border controls, reversing the original intent of free movement [3][39]. - The current political climate in Europe shows a growing resistance to immigration, with public sentiment favoring stricter border controls and a reduction in the acceptance of refugees [41][46]. - The Schengen area, which allows free movement for 450 million people across 29 countries, is now at a crossroads, with leaders grappling with the balance between national security and the foundational principles of the agreement [42][50]. Group 1 - The Schengen Agreement was initially aimed at eliminating border checks among member states, fostering European integration and free movement [1][4]. - Recent data indicates a significant increase in temporary border controls among Schengen countries, with 400 instances recorded from 2015 to 2024, highlighting a shift towards more restrictive policies [24][39]. - The political pressure from far-right parties in Germany has influenced the government's stance on immigration and border control, leading to a more stringent approach [8][41]. Group 2 - Luxembourg, as the birthplace of the Schengen Agreement, continues to advocate for the core principles of free movement, opposing the internal border controls reinstated by neighboring countries [5][39]. - The German government, under new leadership, has implemented strict border checks, citing public safety concerns and a rise in illegal immigration as justifications [6][10]. - The reintroduction of border controls has caused logistical challenges, disrupting cross-border commuting and trade, which are essential for the European economy [44][35]. Group 3 - The EU has expressed dissatisfaction with the increasing frequency of border controls, emphasizing the need for compliance with Schengen regulations and the importance of protecting external borders [38][39]. - The ongoing immigration crisis has led to a rise in populist sentiments across Europe, complicating the political landscape and challenging the unity of the EU [25][46]. - The future of the Schengen Agreement hinges on addressing the underlying issues of immigration and public sentiment, as well as balancing national interests with collective European goals [50][47].

谁还记得，这是特朗普开打贸易战以来的第几次妥协了？ 英国首相温斯顿·丘吉尔在1946年提出的"欧洲联合"构想，便是最早的理论基础，旨在促进欧洲各国团 结一致，共同建设一个和平、稳定的欧洲。 可还不等欧洲国家抱团，美国就先横插一脚，于1949年搞起了北大西洋公约组织，于是，就在这样的军 事联盟中，欧洲各国率先在防务领域展开了合作。 5月23日，在特朗普的诉求下，日本首相石破茂与白宫进行了关税战以来的首次通电，传达了要求重新 评估关税措施的立场。 仅仅两天后的25日，特朗普就又与欧盟进行了"非常愉快"的谈话，并达成协议，将关税谈判期限延长至 7月9日。 要知道，就在23日，特朗普还在社交媒体上发文宣称"美欧谈判毫无进展"，并扬言"欧盟成立是为了在 贸易上占美国的便宜"。 毫无疑问，这一出"左右手互博"的大戏，再次向我们展现了特朗普的喜怒无常，但"反复打脸自己"显然 不合符美国的形象，类似闹剧的背后，往往都牵连着更深的利益诉求…… 抱团的联盟 二战结束后，欧洲各国在废墟上寻找重建的道路，战争带来的深重创伤促使一些欧洲国家开始思考如何 避免再次爆发世界大战规模的战争，由此，欧洲一体化的思想开始萌芽。 但北约的成立加剧 ...

Group 1 - The presidential elections in Poland and Romania are taking place, with significant implications for EU unity and overall direction [1][2] - In Poland, 13 candidates are competing, with the main contest between pro-European candidate Trzaskowski and nationalist candidate Nawrocki, supported by current leaders [1] - The outcome of the Polish election is seen as a critical test for the country's pro-European vision and its alignment with Germany and the EU [1] Group 2 - In Romania, the second round of voting features George Simion and independent candidate Nicușor Dan, following a previous invalidated election round [2] - The rise of Eurosceptic leaders like Nawrocki and Simion could strengthen the influence of Eurosceptic factions within the EU and exacerbate internal divisions [2] - Such electoral outcomes may empower countries challenging the EU's overall direction, like Hungary and Slovakia [2]

Core Viewpoint - The Polish Foreign Minister Sikorski stated that Ukraine's accession to the EU is more feasible than joining NATO, as the EU can provide better security guarantees [1] Group 1: Ukraine's Integration - Sikorski emphasized that there has never been a "realistic prospect" for Ukraine to join NATO, suggesting that European integration is achievable for Ukraine [1] - He mentioned that EU treaties offer "stronger and clearer" security guarantees compared to NATO treaties [1] Group 2: Poland's Military Stance - Sikorski ruled out the possibility of Poland sending troops to Ukraine for peacekeeping missions [1] - He highlighted Poland's responsibility to defend NATO's eastern flank and ensure the smooth transportation and communication for supporting Ukraine's peacekeeping efforts [1] Group 3: Transatlantic Relations - Sikorski remarked on the mutual need between Europe and the United States, agreeing with President Trump's assertion that European countries should bear primary responsibility for their own security [1] - He called for European nations to continue increasing military spending [1]

Core Viewpoint - The Governor of the National Bank of Ukraine, Andriy Pyshnyi, indicated that Ukraine is considering abandoning the US dollar as its reference currency in favor of the euro, driven by increasing ties with Europe and the fragmentation of global trade [1][2]. Group 1: Currency Transition Considerations - Ukraine's potential shift to the euro is influenced by its aspirations for EU membership and the growing role of the EU in enhancing Ukraine's defense capabilities [1][3]. - The euro's share in foreign exchange transactions is gradually increasing, although it remains relatively small compared to the dollar [1][2]. - The transition to the euro is described as complex and requires comprehensive preparation [1][4]. Group 2: Economic Implications - The shift to the euro could significantly reduce transaction costs and exchange rate risks for Ukraine in its European integration efforts [3][4]. - The National Bank of Ukraine has recently moved from a fixed exchange rate to a managed floating exchange rate, still referencing the dollar [2][4]. - Pyshnyi forecasts moderate economic growth for Ukraine in the next two years, estimating a growth rate between 3.7% and 3.9% [5][6]. Group 3: External Financial Support - Ukraine is heavily reliant on external financing, expecting to receive approximately $55 billion in external support this year to cover fiscal deficits and build reserves [6][5]. - Future aid is projected to decrease, with expectations of $17 billion in 2026 and $15 billion in 2027 [6].

以下文章来源于观察者网 ，作者阮佳琪 观察者网 . 关注我们，一起观察 来源：观察者网 文：阮佳琪 当地时间4日，俄媒塔斯社援引塞尔维亚广播电视台（RTS）的报道称，塞尔维亚第一副总理兼财政 部长西尼沙·马利（Sinisa Mali）表示，早前因突发不适中断访美行程回国的塞总统武契奇已经出 院。 马利进一步指出，若武契奇前往莫斯科，届时将与巴西、俄罗斯等多国领导人会面，"这不仅体现了 他个人的形象与威望，更彰显了国际社会对塞尔维亚的尊重，因为他代表着自己的国家。" 马利补充道，"过几天他就会回到工作岗位上，我们也将继续努力工作。" 据塞媒早前报道，5月9日，俄罗斯将在莫斯科举行卫国战争胜利80周年纪念活动。武契奇预计将与 大约来自20个国家的领导人，一起参加在莫斯科红场举行的"胜利日"纪念活动。 然而，这一计划却遭到欧盟方面的横加阻拦。欧盟官员此前威胁称，武契奇此行"将违反欧盟成员国 标准"，可能导致塞尔维亚失去加入欧盟的机会。塞尔维亚在2009年申请加入欧盟，已于2012年获得 候选国地位。 面对欧盟的压力，武契奇态度坚决。当地时间4月16日，武契奇在全国讲话中明确表示，即便遭到来 自欧盟的压力犹如"天塌下 ...