Core Viewpoint - The newly revised Public Security Administration Punishment Law, effective from January 1, 2026, introduces a provision for the "sealing of public security violation records," which has sparked intense public debate regarding its implications for drug-related offenses and the concept of zero tolerance towards drug crimes [1][4]. Group 1: Legal Framework and Implementation - The new law stipulates that records of public security violations should be sealed and not disclosed to any individual or organization, except for specific legal inquiries, which must be kept confidential [1][3]. - This sealing system is not new, as there is already a mechanism for sealing juvenile criminal records, and the recent law aligns with the spirit of the 20th National Congress decision to establish a sealing system for minor offenses [2]. Group 2: Public Reaction and Concerns - While the public generally understands the sealing of public security violation records, there is significant opposition specifically regarding the sealing of drug-related offenses, particularly for drug use [4][6]. - Concerns arise from the perception that sealing drug use records may undermine the long-standing societal stance of zero tolerance towards drug-related crimes [4][8]. Group 3: Social Rehabilitation and Governance - Experts emphasize the importance of social rehabilitation for drug users, arguing that punitive measures should not push them further into societal exclusion, which could lead to higher relapse rates [7][8]. - The law aims to create conditions for reintegration into society for those with prior violations, aligning with the broader goal of promoting social recovery for drug users [8]. Group 4: Need for Detailed Implementation Guidelines - There is a call for the swift development of detailed implementation guidelines to clarify the exceptions for legal inquiries and the scope of the sealing system [9]. - Questions remain regarding how to handle cases of repeat offenders and the criteria for which records can be sealed, indicating a need for careful consideration in the law's application [9].

Core Viewpoint - The drug control issue in Liangshan is deeply intertwined with poverty, necessitating a dual approach of poverty alleviation and drug control to achieve significant progress in combating drug problems [1][2]. Group 1: Drug Control Measures - Liangshan has prioritized drug control as a critical task for both the party and government, with a structured approach involving leadership at all levels from state to village [1]. - The Sichuan High Court has integrated drug control into its key agenda, establishing a long-term support mechanism for Liangshan's drug control efforts [1]. - In 2024, the Sichuan courts processed 1,866 drug-related cases, a 79.05% decrease from the severe drug situation in 2017, indicating a significant improvement in drug control [1]. Group 2: Poverty Alleviation Initiatives - The strategy of linking drug control with poverty alleviation has been implemented, with 13,800 impoverished drug users being lifted out of poverty and addiction [1]. - The comprehensive approach has effectively curtailed the cycle of poverty leading to drug use and vice versa [1]. Group 3: Legal Actions and Deterrence - The Liangshan court has imposed severe penalties on drug traffickers, including death sentences for major offenders, creating a strong deterrent effect [2]. - Since 2017, Liangshan courts have sentenced 2,741 individuals to over five years in prison for drug-related crimes, leading to a 99.96% decrease in cases involving Liangshan as a drug trafficking hub [2].