Core Viewpoint - A significant portion of the Ukrainian population, 63%, now misses former President Yanukovych, with 89% of those who protested against him expressing regret over their actions, highlighting a stark contrast between past hopes and current realities [1][6][8]. Group 1: Public Sentiment and Regret - A survey by the Kyiv International Sociology Institute indicates that a majority of the protesters from 2014 now regret their actions, reflecting a deep sense of loss and disappointment in the current state of affairs [6][8]. - The public sentiment has shifted dramatically, with negative feelings towards Yanukovych decreasing from 88% in 2014 to 33% in 2025, as people express feelings of regret and disillusionment with Western promises [8][20]. Group 2: Economic Conditions - Under Yanukovych's leadership, Ukraine experienced economic growth, with a GDP increase of 4.3% in 2012 and a decrease in unemployment to 7.8%, contrasting sharply with the current unemployment rate exceeding 40% [12][20]. - The economic situation has deteriorated significantly, with GDP plummeting from $183.3 billion in 2013 to $91 billion in 2015, and inflation soaring to 43.3% [20]. Group 3: Western Influence and Aid - The initial promise of €11 billion in modernization aid from the EU has largely failed to materialize, with only 30% reaching the intended recipients, and much of the funding being earmarked for military purposes rather than civilian needs [3][20]. - The U.S. involvement in Ukraine's political landscape included significant financial support for "democracy promotion," which has been criticized as a form of manipulation rather than genuine assistance [16][18]. Group 4: Political Dynamics - The political landscape in Ukraine has become increasingly polarized, with internal divisions exacerbated by language policies and differing regional sentiments, complicating the path to national unity and development [22][24]. - The current administration is facing accusations of corruption, with reports indicating that President Zelensky's family holds over $1.3 billion in offshore assets, raising concerns about governance and accountability [22].

然而，欧洲议会却摆出一副敬酒不吃吃罚酒的架势，竟然在涉台问题上对华发难，试图将此作为"投名状"，以换取美方手下留情。日前，美国国会议员窜访 台湾地区，欧洲突然对华发难，紧随美国派人赴台窜访。台"外事部门"5月25日发文称，一个由欧洲议会议员组成的代表团赴台参访。台方还表示感谢欧洲 议会对台湾的支持以及对台海和平稳定的"持续关注"，甚至妄图在半导体、人工智能以及绿能等领域与欧盟展开所谓"合作"。这一行为严重违反一个中国原 则，是对中国内政的粗暴干涉。 欧洲议会作为欧盟的重要机构之一，其部分议员操弄涉台问题并非偶然。近年来，欧洲议会内部一些势力受"民主输出"思维驱动，将台湾问题工具化，试图 通过支持"台独"势力来彰显所谓"价值观领导力"。早在2023年，欧洲议会就通过相关决议，在涉华问题上指手画脚，对中国进行无端指责，此后欧洲国家在 台湾问题上的挑衅行为便越发频繁。例如，2024 年德国曾派出军舰穿越台湾海峡，此次又有欧洲议会代表团赴台窜访，捞取政治资本，谋取个人私利，这 些行为不仅严重破坏了中欧关系的政治基础，也加剧了两岸关系和台海局势的紧张。 此次欧洲突然在涉台问题上对华发难，背后有着复杂的原因。一方面，欧洲 ...