"十四五"期末穗有效发明专利量较2020年增超180% 编辑：熊思怡 中新网广州12月26日电 (记者 许青青)广州市市场监管局26日介绍，"十四五"以来，广州市市场监管部 门紧扣"促发展、保安全、惠民生"的主题，为各类经营主体营造了更有活力、更加公平的市场环境。目 前，广州实有经营主体总量跃居全国第二；到"十四五"期末，广州市有效发明专利量较2020年增长超 180%，达到20万件。 广告等商务合作，请点击这里 在智慧监管方面，广州上线"数字化市场监管在线"系统，构建"1个数据中心、1个综合平台、12条业务 线"的架构，实现全周期管理。依托DeepSeek大模型技术，推出"市场主体直通车"服务，企业开办线上 办理率达99%，平均办结时长压缩至8分53秒。物联网、视频智能分析等技术应用于重点领域监管，如 全市4000多家学校食堂和供餐单位的厨房"互联网+明厨亮灶"，实现24小时全天候监控；超21.5万台电 梯接入智慧治理平台，可自动识别预警异常情况。 本文为转载内容，授权事宜请联系原著作权人 中新经纬版权所有，未经书面授权，任何单位及个人不得转载、摘编或以其它方式使用。 关注中新经纬微信公众号(微信搜索"中新 ...

Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes the need for regulatory oversight in the platform economy to prevent disorderly competition among companies like Ele.me, Meituan, and JD.com, which has led to negative consequences for consumers and small businesses [1][2]. Group 1: Regulatory Actions and Market Dynamics - The State Administration for Market Regulation has urged major platform companies to adhere to laws and regulations, promoting a win-win ecosystem for consumers, merchants, delivery riders, and platforms [1]. - Recent competitive practices among food delivery platforms, such as extreme discounting and aggressive algorithms, have resulted in unsustainable business models, harming small merchants and leading to potential safety issues for delivery riders [1][2]. Group 2: Legal Framework and Challenges - There is a significant "time gap" between technological innovation in the platform economy and the legal framework needed to regulate it effectively, with existing laws insufficient to address new forms of unfair competition like algorithmic discrimination and data monopolies [2][3]. - The traditional regulatory approach may not be suitable for the cross-regional nature of e-commerce platforms, leading to challenges in enforcement and oversight [2]. Group 3: Recommendations for Improvement - Enhancing legal provisions and restructuring the regulatory ecosystem is crucial to mitigate disorderly competition, with a focus on optimizing rules and regulations [3]. - The revised Anti-Unfair Competition Law prohibits platforms from forcing merchants to sell below cost, aiming to restore market order and protect competition [3]. - A collaborative effort is needed among stakeholders to establish a governance chain that includes preemptive warnings, real-time enforcement, and post-incident remedies [3][4]. Group 4: Future Directions - The Central Political Bureau has called for lawful governance of corporate competition, suggesting that clear legal boundaries will allow platforms to focus on innovation rather than aggressive competition tactics [4].