在合规与环保口径上，BIOTEN™坚持"数据可验证、结论可复现"：生物基碳含量（ASTM D6866 Method B）｜FDA/FCN（满足）｜PFAS未人为添加 ｜低VOC。功能与性能统一采用"方法/条件/单位/范围"披露（如Cobb/Kit、WVTR〔ASTM F1249〕、OTR〔ASTM D3985〕等），具体数值以TDS/项目报告 为准。循环维度上，纸基体系可按CEPI/PTS路线评估再浆/回收；堆肥按ASTM D6400/D6868推进（可申请BPI/TÜV Austria OK compost）。 应用侧价值：在水性涂料/纸基阻隔涂层中，BIOTEN™通过"阻隔+热封+胶黏"协同设计提升加工效率与综合性能（兼顾耐液体/耐油脂、热封强度与线 速适配）；在乳胶漆（内/外墙）中，BIOTEN™ 可作为生物基改性组分或协同乳液，在超低VOC口径下兼顾成膜与耐水/耐碱，与TiO₂/碳酸钙/滑石粉等颜 填料配伍性良好；支持滚涂/喷涂施工的开放时间与重涂间隔优化；在胶黏剂/压敏胶中，配方可在初粘/持粘与再加工适配（上胶量、剥离、内聚强度）之间 取得平衡；在种衣剂场景，涂层于萌发前提供保湿/隔氧/温和缓释，萌 ...

Core Viewpoint - The research emphasizes that achieving carbon neutrality should involve distinct targets for source reduction and subsequent carbon removal, combining both approaches to mitigate negative perceptions of carbon removal technologies and provide new solutions for carbon reduction challenges [1][2] Group 1: Carbon Neutrality Strategy - The study advocates for a dual approach to carbon neutrality, focusing on both source reduction through renewable energy technologies and post-emission carbon removal methods like afforestation and direct air capture [1] - Current global climate policies primarily set net-zero emission targets without clearly defining the balance between source reduction and carbon removal, which may lead to reliance on future carbon removal technologies while continuing fossil fuel use [2] Group 2: Challenges and Solutions - The development of carbon removal technologies faces uncertainties regarding future investment scale, technical feasibility, and economic viability, which contribute to skepticism about their effectiveness [2] - The research team proposes setting independent targets for source reduction and carbon removal, which can lead to better outcomes in terms of short-term carbon reduction effectiveness, timeline for achieving carbon neutrality, and controlling maximum temperature rise [2]