Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the risks associated with the use of "accessibility features" in AI assistants, highlighting the potential for privacy invasion and unauthorized data access when these features are misused [2][4][5]. Group 1: Accessibility Features and Risks - "Accessibility features" were originally designed to assist individuals with disabilities, providing higher system permissions that allow for extensive control over devices [3][4]. - Granting AI assistants access to these features effectively gives them a "master key" to monitor and control various applications, raising significant privacy and security concerns [4][9]. - The misuse of "accessibility permissions" can lead to invasive software that exceeds user expectations and compromises personal data [5][9]. Group 2: Real-World Examples of Misuse - Malicious software has exploited "accessibility features" to perform unauthorized actions, such as intercepting data and executing transactions without user consent [7][8]. - Notable cases include software that automatically seized control of apps like WeChat for fraudulent activities, demonstrating the direct link between permission misuse and economic threats [7][9]. - The article cites a 2025 incident where criminals used AI technology to manipulate users into granting "accessibility permissions," leading to complete control over their devices [8][9]. Group 3: Alternative Solutions - The article suggests that there are safer, standardized methods for AI interaction that do not rely on "accessibility features," such as using API integrations [10][12]. - A new standard released in 2025 prohibits the misuse of "accessibility services," emphasizing the need for explicit user consent before enabling such features [10][14]. - Companies like Apple are highlighted for their commitment to user privacy, developing AI functionalities that do not compromise personal data through invasive methods [12][13]. Group 4: Industry Standards and Ethical Considerations - The industry is beginning to recognize the dangers of "accessibility permission" misuse, with new standards being established to protect user rights and data [13][14]. - The article argues that prioritizing user privacy over commercial convenience is essential for sustainable business practices in the AI sector [12][16]. - Ethical considerations in technology development are crucial, as sacrificing user trust for short-term gains can lead to long-term failures [16].