更耐人寻味的是，当地某具体负责人在回复媒体时，将抄袭责任简单粗暴地归咎于"第三方公司"，并轻 描淡写地以"作为参考，没有修改""做得太粗心"来甩锅。至于修正善后事宜，该负责人给出的方案则 是"我们抓紧联系公司来改"。如此超然于事外，全然罔顾谁才是真正的责任人。 曾几何时，类似事件中的背锅侠，常见"临时工"的身影。自从有了"政府购买服务"，"第三方"替代"临 时工"沦为背锅侠的场景日益多见。当地某负责人的这一太极推手，推掉的岂止是几段文字的审核？它 推掉的分明是法律赋予行政机关的神圣责任。作为政务公文，《规划》以政府名义发布，每一字每一句 都承载着公权力的严肃性与公信力。公文起草与审核，是政府机关和职能部门的法定职责，其内容必须 真实可靠、数据必须准确无误。 权责一致是法治政府的基石。任何公文的法定起草者及署名的发布机关（或部门），在法律上就是无可 推卸的责任主体。平乐县有关部门将审核失职轻巧地转嫁归咎于"第三方"，实质是对法定责任的消解， 更是对政府公信力的一次公开折损。 这一个案也揭示出部分地方权力运行中的一种扭曲逻辑：凡涉及权力行使、资源调配的关键领域，必紧 握在手，不容假手于人；然面对需细致调研、踏实付 ...

Group 1 - The core viewpoint emphasizes the importance of breaking informal rules (潜规则) that lead to corruption and misconduct within party organizations, highlighting the need for strict political discipline and regulations to maintain a healthy political environment [1][2] - The article discusses the negative impact of informal rules, which include power rent-seeking and unethical behavior, on the integrity of party members and the public's trust in government [1] - It stresses that eliminating the conditions that allow informal rules to thrive requires effective measures, transparency in power operations, and strict punishment for violations [1] Group 2 - The fundamental strategy to combat informal rules is to establish clear regulations that promote integrity and accountability within party organizations [2] - The article notes that the effectiveness of these regulations depends on their execution, urging party members to internalize and adhere to the established rules [2] - It concludes that as formal regulations strengthen, informal rules will diminish, leading to a more positive political climate [2]

Core Insights - The article discusses the wealth accumulation of He Shen during the Qing Dynasty, particularly through the manipulation of the tax system and the control of key revenue sources like the Guangdong Customs and the Chongwenmen Tax Station [2][12][20] - It highlights the systemic corruption and the intertwining of state power and personal wealth, illustrating how He Shen leveraged his positions to extract wealth from both domestic and international trade [16][19] Group 1: Wealth Accumulation Mechanisms - He Shen's wealth peaked at 1.1 billion taels of silver, primarily derived from monopolizing military funds, tax revenues, and land acquisitions [2][12] - The Guangdong Customs, referred to as "Tianzi Nanku," was a crucial revenue source, with its tax revenue reaching approximately 1.17 million taels, accounting for 70% of national customs revenue at its peak [8][12] - The "regulatory fees" collected at the Guangdong Customs often exceeded the official tax revenues, with over 100 different fees contributing to a significant gray income stream [4][9] Group 2: Corruption and Governance - The article describes a dual system of taxation where "official taxes" and "regulatory fees" coexisted, revealing the flaws in Qing Dynasty fiscal management [10][12] - He Shen's management style involved a system of patronage and corruption, where customs officials were incentivized to share a portion of their income with him, creating a cycle of systemic corruption [6][19] - The Chongwenmen Tax Station operated similarly, with He Shen overseeing its operations, further consolidating his control over tax revenues and facilitating personal enrichment [15][16] Group 3: Economic Impact - The manipulation of tax systems led to a distortion of economic competition, with Chinese tea prices in Europe being 15% higher than Indian tea due to the added costs from regulatory fees [12][20] - The systemic corruption and inefficiencies resulted in significant revenue losses, with over 500,000 taels lost annually due to smuggling and tax evasion [12][20] - The article concludes that the intertwining of state power and personal wealth ultimately contributed to the decline of the Qing Dynasty, as the lack of political reform and commercial freedom led to a fragile economic structure [20]