Group 1 - The core viewpoint emphasizes that formalism and bureaucratism are significant obstacles to achieving the party's mission in the new era, and that disciplinary inspection agencies must prioritize reducing the burden of formalism on grassroots levels as a key task in style construction [1][2] - The approach to addressing formalism should be problem-oriented, focusing on regional, industry, and phase-specific characteristics, while also addressing both longstanding and emerging issues [2][3] - There is a need for a long-term mechanism to strengthen source governance, identifying deep-rooted causes of issues related to formalism, and ensuring both immediate and fundamental solutions are implemented [3][4] Group 2 - The strategy includes a focus on correcting issues such as the superficial implementation of central decisions, excessive documentation, and the burden of layered tasks on grassroots levels [2][3] - The importance of integrating disciplinary education with management and supervision to encourage accountability and innovation among cadres is highlighted [4] - The establishment of a comprehensive information platform and the use of big data analysis are proposed to enhance the detection and resolution of formalism-related issues [2][3]