Workflow
纠树并举
icon
Search documents
笔谈丨纠树并举深化作风建设
Group 1 - Strengthening work style construction is a fine tradition of the party and an important guarantee for moving from victory to victory [1] - The discipline inspection and supervision organs must implement the spirit of the Central Eight Regulations, focusing on the "Four Winds" to promote a positive atmosphere [1] - Emphasis on tightening the responsibility chain, ensuring that the party committee's main responsibility, discipline inspection supervision, and functional department supervision work together effectively [1] Group 2 - Acknowledgment of the stubbornness and repetitiveness of work style issues, enhancing collaboration with finance, auditing, and market supervision departments for better oversight [2] - Implementation of a comprehensive approach to address work style issues, including education, inspections, and strict penalties for violations [2] - Focus on addressing specific problems such as non-responsiveness, market disorder, and increased burdens on grassroots levels [2] Group 3 - Emphasis on both correcting and establishing good practices, utilizing typical cases to educate on ethics, discipline, law, and responsibilities [3] - Continuous monitoring and analysis of the work style of the cadre team and the relationship between officials and the public [3] - Strengthening the construction of a clean culture in the new era, enhancing the supply of quality products and services based on public expectations and actual needs [3]
纠治形式主义为基层减负
Group 1 - The core viewpoint emphasizes that formalism and bureaucratism are significant obstacles to achieving the party's mission in the new era, and that disciplinary inspection agencies must prioritize reducing the burden of formalism on grassroots levels as a key task in style construction [1][2] - The approach to addressing formalism should be problem-oriented, focusing on regional, industry, and phase-specific characteristics, while also addressing both longstanding and emerging issues [2][3] - There is a need for a long-term mechanism to strengthen source governance, identifying deep-rooted causes of issues related to formalism, and ensuring both immediate and fundamental solutions are implemented [3][4] Group 2 - The strategy includes a focus on correcting issues such as the superficial implementation of central decisions, excessive documentation, and the burden of layered tasks on grassroots levels [2][3] - The importance of integrating disciplinary education with management and supervision to encourage accountability and innovation among cadres is highlighted [4] - The establishment of a comprehensive information platform and the use of big data analysis are proposed to enhance the detection and resolution of formalism-related issues [2][3]