Group 1 - The core viewpoint emphasizes the transition of ecological environment regulation from a "manpower-based" approach to a "data-driven" model, with "one enterprise, one file" as a foundational tool for managing fixed pollution sources [1] - In practice, there are challenges such as lagging infrastructure and slow digitalization, which hinder the precision and intelligence of ecological environment regulation [1] - In Fengqing County, Yunnan Province, only over 200 out of nearly 3000 enterprises that conducted environmental assessments since 2016 have established proper archives, indicating a significant regulatory blind spot [1] Group 2 - To address these challenges, a "three-in-one" reform is proposed, focusing on building standardized archive infrastructure with independent storage facilities and smart environmental control systems [2] - The development of a digital management platform is essential, integrating IoT, big data, and AI technologies to create a comprehensive management system with features like automatic archiving and risk dynamic warning [2] - The implementation of an archive lifecycle traceability mechanism is recommended to ensure the integrity and traceability of regulatory clues [2] Group 3 - A robust institutional guarantee system is necessary, including quantifiable assessment standards for archive completeness, accuracy, and timeliness, with a strict 48-hour deadline for archiving environmental administrative documents [3] - The establishment of a verification team composed of professionals from various fields is crucial for cross-checking the authenticity of archives and creating a blacklist for false materials [3] - Upgrading archive images to high definition and utilizing advanced scanning technology will support structured data for environmental risk assessment models, facilitating a shift from experience-based to data-driven regulatory decision-making [3]