Core Viewpoint - The "Qiaohang Tianxia APP," a key evidence carrier in the illegal fundraising case involving the Zhejiang Overseas Chinese group, is at risk of being shut down due to login issues, which could lead to the loss of dynamic evidence crucial for civil litigation and liability determination [2][3]. Group 1: APP's Operational Challenges - Investors have been pooling funds to maintain the APP's cloud service, raising over 60,000 yuan to extend its service through 2026 after the initial funding in 2025 [3][4]. - The APP's backend login is at risk due to a phone number linked to a former employee of the Overseas Chinese group being out of service, which could lead to the termination of the cloud service by February 6 [5][6]. Group 2: Importance of Dynamic Evidence - The APP contains dynamic evidence that is irreplaceable, as it can demonstrate user operation paths and validate the legitimacy of electronic contracts through embedded electronic signatures [6][7]. - The loss of the APP would mean the permanent loss of the only platform capable of restoring the true operational model of the investment scheme, which has already been implicated in a previous case involving 1.5 billion yuan [7][8]. Group 3: Legal and Regulatory Implications - There is a fundamental disagreement between the investors and the investigation team regarding the necessity of preserving the dynamic APP, with the latter believing that static data backups suffice for criminal evidence [8][10]. - Legal experts emphasize that the original carrier of electronic data, such as the APP, should be prioritized for preservation, as it holds significant evidentiary value in civil litigation [10].

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the critical situation surrounding the "Qiaohang Tianxia APP," which is at risk of being shut down due to unpaid service fees, jeopardizing key evidence related to a 4 billion yuan illegal fundraising case involving the Zhejiang Overseas Chinese Group [3][4]. Group 1: APP's Financial Struggles - Investors have collectively raised over 60,000 yuan to keep the APP operational, with contributions of 50 to 100 yuan from hundreds of individuals to cover cloud service fees for 2025 and 2026 [5][8]. - The APP's backend login is at risk due to a phone number linked to a former employee of the group being inactive, which could lead to the termination of services by Alibaba Cloud if not resolved by February 6 [8][9]. Group 2: Importance of Dynamic Evidence - The APP contains dynamic evidence crucial for civil litigation, as it can demonstrate user interactions and investment processes, which static data cannot replicate [10][11]. - The APP's design obscures its true function, with investment features hidden, complicating the defense against claims that it is merely an e-commerce platform [10][11]. Group 3: Legal and Technical Implications - There is a significant divergence between the criminal investigation's focus on static data and the investors' need for dynamic evidence to support their claims in civil court [13][15]. - The original data stored in the APP is deemed more valuable than static backups, as it can provide context and authenticity to the evidence, which is critical for legal proceedings [15][16].

Core Viewpoint - The "Qiaohang Tianxia APP," crucial evidence in a 4 billion yuan illegal fundraising case, is at risk of being shut down due to unpaid service fees, threatening the preservation of dynamic evidence necessary for civil litigation [1][2][4] Group 1: APP Maintenance and Funding - Investors have collectively raised over 60,000 yuan to extend the APP's cloud service fees for 2025 and 2026, highlighting the urgency of preserving evidence [2][3] - The APP's backend login is at risk due to an unpaid phone number associated with a former employee, which could lead to the termination of services by Alibaba Cloud [3][6] Group 2: Importance of Dynamic Evidence - The APP contains unique dynamic evidence that cannot be replaced by static data backups, which is critical for legal proceedings [4][7] - The APP's design obscures its true function as an illegal fundraising platform, making the preservation of its operational data essential for countering legal defenses [4][9] Group 3: Legal and Regulatory Context - Legal experts emphasize the need to prioritize the preservation of original electronic data carriers, such as the APP, to ensure the integrity and authenticity of evidence in civil disputes [9] - The ongoing struggle to maintain the APP reflects broader challenges in digital evidence preservation in the context of increasing reliance on digital platforms for transactions [9]