Core Insights - The article discusses the increasing competition and challenges faced by students applying for graduate programs in Hong Kong due to changing international policies and heightened application standards [5][10][22]. Group 1: Application Challenges - The requirement for applicants to have published an SSCI Zone 1 paper for a research master's program in Hong Kong is unprecedented and raises the bar for admission standards [3][4][26]. - The number of non-local student applications to Hong Kong universities has surged by over 20% compared to the previous year, influenced by U.S. visa policy changes [5][9]. - The competitive landscape has shifted, with students who initially planned to study in the U.S. now applying to Hong Kong, leading to a more crowded application process [9][23]. Group 2: Impact of U.S. Policies - U.S. visa policies have become more stringent, causing delays and rejections for students, which has prompted many to reconsider their study destinations [12][41]. - The "Catch and Revoke" plan by the U.S. Department of Homeland Security could potentially affect around 270,000 Chinese students, marking a significant tightening of visa regulations [12][13]. - The uncertainty surrounding U.S. immigration policies has led students to seek more stable options, such as studying in Hong Kong, which is perceived as a safer choice [22][35]. Group 3: Student Experiences - Students like Zhou Baihao and Zhao Ruiping are feeling the pressure of increased competition and the need to adapt their plans quickly in response to changing circumstances [22][27]. - Zhou Baihao's experience illustrates the intense pressure to publish research papers and the feeling of being in a never-ending race to meet application requirements [25][26]. - Zhao Ruiping's decision to shift focus from U.S. to Hong Kong reflects a broader trend among students seeking to mitigate risks associated with U.S. study plans [21][34]. Group 4: Changing Perspectives - The article highlights a shift in students' attitudes towards studying abroad, with many now opting for more conservative choices in light of recent developments [37][42]. - The perception of studying in Hong Kong has changed, with students now considering it a viable alternative to the U.S., despite the initial belief that it would be an easier path [22][38]. - The competitive dynamics have led students to adjust their application strategies, often opting for less popular programs to increase their chances of acceptance [38][39].

Core Points - The ongoing conflict between the Trump administration and Harvard University regarding visa restrictions for international students has led Harvard to seek a temporary restraining order from the court [1][2] - Harvard's President, Alan M. Garber, has communicated with the university community to assure them that the institution will continue to support international students and scholars [2][3] Summary by Sections Legal Actions - Harvard University has successfully obtained a temporary restraining order from a federal judge, halting the Trump administration's announcement to impose a six-month visa restriction on international students [2][3] - The court's decision allows international students to continue their studies at Harvard while a hearing is scheduled for June 16 [2][3] Institutional Response - President Garber emphasized the university's commitment to maintaining the rights of international students and scholars, and the institution is developing contingency plans to ensure their academic activities can proceed [3] - The Harvard International Office is actively reaching out to affected students and scholars to provide support during this period of uncertainty [3] Broader Implications - The uncertainty surrounding U.S. visa policies is causing anxiety among prospective international students, with some considering alternative offers from universities in other countries [4] - The historical context of Harvard's legal challenges against previous visa policies under the Trump administration highlights the ongoing tension between the university and federal government [3][4] Judicial Influence - Notably, four out of nine federal judges currently serving on the U.S. Court are Harvard Law School alumni, which may influence the judicial proceedings related to this case [5]