在凝聚合力上坚持"三个注重"，强化联动统筹。注重制度共建，以政治巡察为契机，聚焦巡前、巡中、 巡后深度协同协作，研究出台《关于进一步加强纪检监察监督、巡察监督与审计监督协调协作的若干举 措》，促进资源共享、信息互通、联合监督、成果共用。注重对象共商，根据市纪委监委机关提供的全 面从严治党形势、违纪违法案件查处和监督检查任务安排等情况，综合研判拟定每轮巡察对象，市委巡 察办加强与审计部门监督对象的统筹，年初共同商定巡察、审计年度计划，根据任务特点，采取先审后 巡、先巡后审、巡审同步等联动工作模式，强化巡审深度衔接配合。注重队伍共建，充分发挥巡察熔炉 作用，把巡察岗位作为发现、培养、锻炼干部的重要平台，强化纪检监察干部与巡察干部轮岗交流，加 强巡察人才库建设，充实纪检监察干部、审计专业人才入库，配齐配强巡察力量。 在靶向监督上坚持"三项机制"，强化精准高效。建立重要情况通报机制，在每轮巡察启动前，市纪委监 委、市委巡察办会同市审计局共同交流重要情况，"面对面""一对一"介绍被巡察单位的有关问题线索处 置、信访举报、审计监督等情况，提出需要重点关注的问题及工作建议；每轮巡察完成后，巡察组"一 对一"向市纪委监委相关 ...

Group 1 - The article emphasizes the importance of establishing a mechanism for the regular discovery and resolution of issues related to work style, which is crucial for maintaining the Party's advanced nature and purity [5][6][18] - It highlights the need for continuous and detailed efforts in work style construction, with a focus on persistent vigilance against the "Four Winds" issues [5][7][22] - The article discusses the integration of various supervisory channels, including internal, public, and media oversight, to effectively identify and address work style problems [6][9][10] Group 2 - The article outlines the necessity of a dual approach to tackling work style issues, combining immediate corrective actions with long-term preventive measures [6][12][20] - It stresses the importance of utilizing data analytics and digital tools to enhance the precision and efficiency of supervision [9][11][20] - The article calls for a systematic approach to reform, ensuring that both individual cases and broader systemic issues are addressed to prevent recurrence of work style problems [13][22][23]

Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes the importance of integrating various supervisory mechanisms, including disciplinary inspection, auditing, financial oversight, and statistical supervision, to enhance the effectiveness of governance and accountability in local government operations [1] Group 1: Optimization of Collaborative Mechanisms - Establishment of a regular communication platform that combines online and offline methods to facilitate real-time sharing of supervisory dynamics and problem clues among departments [2] - Development of a standardized process for transferring problem clues across departments to ensure efficient handling and feedback [2] - Implementation of a collaborative work procedure that clarifies the roles and responsibilities of different departments in the supervision process [2] Group 2: Deepening Daily Integration - Creation of a "supervisory data sharing list" to integrate data from various departments, enhancing the scope of oversight beyond single departmental perspectives [3] - Formation of joint supervisory teams that combine personnel from disciplinary inspection and professional departments to tackle complex issues [3] - Targeting specific issues identified during daily supervision for focused audits and disciplinary actions [3] Group 3: Strengthening Special Coordination - Establishment of a four-party collaborative mechanism for special rectification efforts in areas like public welfare funds and construction projects, ensuring a comprehensive approach to problem resolution [4] - Creation of specialized task forces for major complex cases, integrating expertise from various fields to enhance problem-solving capabilities [5] - Utilization of technology and data analysis to improve the identification of anomalies and enhance the overall effectiveness of supervision [5]