研发效能
Search documents
思码逸:2025研发效能红宝书2.0
Sou Hu Cai Jing· 2025-11-21 23:58
今天分享的是:思码逸:2025研发效能红宝书2.0 全书核心围绕三大模块展开。首先是技术与业务的协同共振,打破"做正确的事"与"正确地做事"的二元对立,提出二者相辅相 成的核心观点。强调通过需求价值评分、分层分类管理等实践,建立业务与产研的共赢模式,同时构建适配的组织结构与文化 氛围,让精益思想、敏捷原则与DevOps实践落地见效。 其次是数据驱动的效能度量体系。书中明确研发效能度量需避开单一指标陷阱,推荐GQM+MARI方法论,整合DORA指标、 SPACE框架等主流工具,构建自动化数据采集分析平台。重点推广"代码当量"这一核心指标,通过语法树解析量化代码复杂 度,规避传统代码行数、故事点等指标的局限性,同时结合需求吞吐量、缺陷密度等维度,形成多层面度量视图,为改进措施 提供精准依据。 最后,AI对研发效能的重塑是核心亮点。书中指出生成式AI已渗透研发全生命周期,在代码补全、测试用例生成等场景成效显 著,但实际效率提升约17%,质量提升仍面临挑战。AI在度量领域的应用体现在两方面:一是提升度量数据的准确度,如识别 代码漏洞、校验测试用例有效性;二是减轻分析负担,辅助生成效能报告、挖掘数据趋势。同时强调企业需 ...
高科智库首创上市公司研发效能评价体系
Sou Hu Cai Jing· 2025-07-08 09:32
Core Insights - The report "Top 50 R&D Effective A-share Listed Companies" was independently developed by Gaoke Think Tank, focusing on the efficiency of innovation in A-share listed companies [2] - The selected 50 companies have an average R&D efficiency of 1.66 times, representing the top level in China's hard technology sector [2] Selection Criteria - **Financial Thresholds**: Companies must have revenue greater than 100 million yuan, non-recurring net profit greater than 10 million yuan, main business net profit margin greater than 10%, revenue and profit growth both exceeding 10%, and asset-liability ratio less than 70% [2] - **Innovation Hard Indicators**: R&D intensity (R&D expenses/revenue) must be greater than 10%. The final ranking is based on the R&D effectiveness index (non-recurring net profit/R&D expenses) in descending order [2] Company Profile - **Industry Distribution**: The report covers 22 sub-sectors in hard technology, including industrial control equipment, integrated circuit design, medical devices, and photovoltaic processing equipment [2] - **Representative Companies**: Leading companies include Bochao Electronics, Lanke Technology, and Dier Laser [2] Average Data - The average revenue of the selected companies is 1.005 billion yuan, with a non-recurring net profit of 208 million yuan, a main business net profit margin of 22.35%, and an R&D intensity of 13.98% [3] Methodological Advantages - **Objectivity**: The selection process uses anonymous selection and mathematical modeling to eliminate human intervention [3] - **Innovation**: The report breaks away from traditional ranking methods based on scale or profit, introducing a new dimension of "R&D effectiveness" [4] - **Policy Alignment**: The report aligns with national strategies to enhance the overall efficiency of the innovation system and supports the development of new productivity [4]