Workflow
破解执行难
icon
Search documents
四平铁西法院用执行力度暖透群众“心尖事”
Xin Lang Cai Jing· 2026-02-14 12:23
"这回我们能过个放心年啦!"2月11日,四平市铁西区人民法院审判庭内暖意融融,十几名当事人有序 排队,脸上满是期盼与喜悦,依次办理诈骗案涉案钱款领取手续,每一笔到账提醒,都承载着他们等待 已久的安心。 通讯员:张馨月 初审:李学伟 复审:付新宇 终审:谢刚 三四年前,崔某诈骗他人200余万元,后隐匿财产、销声匿迹,受害群众向公安机关报案后,崔某被抓 获。 铁西法院审理后,以诈骗罪判处崔某有期徒刑13年并处罚金。案件进入执行阶段,崔某名下无可供执行 财产,追赃工作陷入僵局。"再难也要为群众追回血汗钱。"执行法官6次奔赴长春等地调查取证,梳理 其社会关系,最终在崔某朋友处查获其转移的财产。虽然该笔资产登记在其朋友名下,但有证据证明系 崔某出资。法官几次约谈该人,释法说理,讲明利害关系,最终,其在限期内主动将款项汇到法院执行 账户上。 临近年关,法官放弃休息,加班核对账目、核验信息,确保钱款及时发放。发放现场,法官向受骗群众 介绍执行过程,解答他们的疑问,提醒大家增强防范意识,学法守法依法办事,吸取教训,防止上当受 骗。大家纷纷称赞法官尽职尽责,这份温暖瞬间定格司法温度。 此次返款既是法院破解"执行难"的实践,更是 ...
黑龙江宾县法院全力破解“执行难”
Xin Lang Cai Jing· 2025-12-25 18:25
Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the article highlights the measures taken by the Bin County People's Court in Harbin, Heilongjiang Province to address the issue of "difficult enforcement" in legal cases [1] Group 2 - The court has strategically planned and deployed concentrated enforcement actions during the holiday season when debtors return home, targeting cases related to labor remuneration, alimony, and support fees to create a strong deterrent effect [1] - The court is exploring the "enforcement + judicial assistance" model, providing legal aid for cases that meet the criteria of "unable to enforce," helping applicants resolve urgent and difficult issues [1] - A rapid information-sharing mechanism and online enforcement collaboration system have been established in conjunction with the county police bureau to improve enforcement efficiency and ensure timely fulfillment of the legal rights of victorious parties [1]
中央政法委秘书长訚柏:将深化审判权和执行权分离改革,破解“执行难”
Core Viewpoint - The emphasis on fairness and justice as the core values of the judiciary, with a focus on deepening reforms in the judicial power operation mechanism to ensure effective supervision and constraints throughout the judicial process [1] Group 1 - The introduction of reforms aimed at separating adjudication and enforcement powers to enhance the national enforcement system [1] - The initiative to address the issue of "difficulties in enforcement" within the judicial system [1]
对拒执行为携手亮剑(金台锐评)
Ren Min Ri Bao· 2025-07-09 22:32
Core Viewpoint - The joint release of the "Opinions on Handling Criminal Cases of Refusing to Execute Judgments and Rulings" by the Supreme Court, Supreme Procuratorate, and Ministry of Public Security aims to strengthen the punishment for refusal to execute judgments, addressing the long-standing issue of "execution difficulties" and reinforcing the authority of the law [1][2]. Group 1: Legal Framework and Enforcement - The "Opinions" clarify the standards for applying criminal liability for refusal to execute judgments, evidence rules, and procedural connections, enhancing the punitive measures against such behaviors [1]. - There has been a historical tendency to prioritize civil execution over criminal accountability, leading to insufficient coordination among departments, which complicates evidence collection and case transfer [1][2]. - The new mechanism aims to provide better evidence collection support for creditors and to ease the burden of proof in self-reported cases of debtor crimes [2]. Group 2: Systematic Approach to Execution Challenges - Addressing execution difficulties requires a comprehensive approach that combines punishment with education, and short-term measures with long-term solutions [2]. - The establishment of a credit supervision system that imposes restrictions on dishonest executors is essential to ensure compliance with judicial rulings [2]. - A collaborative governance model involving various stakeholders, including the Party, the People's Congress, and the government, is necessary to uphold legal authority and promote social integrity [2]. Group 3: Technological Integration - The integration of technology is crucial in tackling execution challenges, with a focus on enhancing information systems for asset tracking and utilizing big data and AI for analyzing refusal to execute cases [3]. - The promotion of "smart execution" models aims to increase transparency and efficiency in the execution process, ensuring that judicial decisions are effectively enforced [3]. - The ultimate goal is to foster a societal culture where trust is valued and dishonesty is stigmatized, thereby reinforcing the principles of fairness and justice [3].