转自：法治日报 今年以来，黑龙江省哈尔滨市宾县人民法院采取多项措施，全力破解"执行难"。一是利用被执行人返乡 过节的有利时机，精心谋划、周密部署，对追索劳动报酬、抚养费、赡养费等案件开展集中执行行动， 对被执行人形成有力震慑。二是探索推行"执行+司法救助"模式，依法对符合条件的"执行不能"案件进 行司法救助，帮助申请救助人解决急难愁盼问题。三是联合县公安局，建立快速查询信息共享机制、网 络执行查控协作机制，进一步提高执行效率，及时兑现胜诉当事人合法权益。熊俊仪 王佳欣 （来源：法治日报） ...

Core Viewpoint - The emphasis on fairness and justice as the core values of the judiciary, with a focus on deepening reforms in the judicial power operation mechanism to ensure effective supervision and constraints throughout the judicial process [1] Group 1 - The introduction of reforms aimed at separating adjudication and enforcement powers to enhance the national enforcement system [1] - The initiative to address the issue of "difficulties in enforcement" within the judicial system [1]

Core Viewpoint - The joint release of the "Opinions on Handling Criminal Cases of Refusing to Execute Judgments and Rulings" by the Supreme Court, Supreme Procuratorate, and Ministry of Public Security aims to strengthen the punishment for refusal to execute judgments, addressing the long-standing issue of "execution difficulties" and reinforcing the authority of the law [1][2]. Group 1: Legal Framework and Enforcement - The "Opinions" clarify the standards for applying criminal liability for refusal to execute judgments, evidence rules, and procedural connections, enhancing the punitive measures against such behaviors [1]. - There has been a historical tendency to prioritize civil execution over criminal accountability, leading to insufficient coordination among departments, which complicates evidence collection and case transfer [1][2]. - The new mechanism aims to provide better evidence collection support for creditors and to ease the burden of proof in self-reported cases of debtor crimes [2]. Group 2: Systematic Approach to Execution Challenges - Addressing execution difficulties requires a comprehensive approach that combines punishment with education, and short-term measures with long-term solutions [2]. - The establishment of a credit supervision system that imposes restrictions on dishonest executors is essential to ensure compliance with judicial rulings [2]. - A collaborative governance model involving various stakeholders, including the Party, the People's Congress, and the government, is necessary to uphold legal authority and promote social integrity [2]. Group 3: Technological Integration - The integration of technology is crucial in tackling execution challenges, with a focus on enhancing information systems for asset tracking and utilizing big data and AI for analyzing refusal to execute cases [3]. - The promotion of "smart execution" models aims to increase transparency and efficiency in the execution process, ensuring that judicial decisions are effectively enforced [3]. - The ultimate goal is to foster a societal culture where trust is valued and dishonesty is stigmatized, thereby reinforcing the principles of fairness and justice [3].