《市场监督管理信用修复管理办法》（以下简称《办法》）将于12月25日正式实施。12月2日，市场监 管总局召开专题新闻发布会对《办法》进行解读。市场监管总局信用监管司副司长荆琼华介绍，相比较 2021年7月制定出台的《市场监督管理信用修复管理办法》规范性文件，新《办法》以部门规章的形式 发布，统一了信用修复规则，增加了便民利企创新举措。 新规为失信企业提供"重生"机会，助力企业重塑信用，轻装上阵。荆琼华表示，《办法》将修复范围进 一步扩大，覆盖抽查检查与破产重整；修复流程提速，公示期与办理时限双缩短。 有哪些新的举措支持经营主体信用修复？ 荆琼华介绍，市场监管总局不断推动完善信用修复制度机制，鼓励企业主动纠正违法失信行为、消除不 良影响，依法申请修复失信记录。同时大力提升信用修复服务水平。上线运行市场监管信用修复全国统 一平台，实现了"统一入口、异地修复"。指导各地开展"信用修复服务年"活动；选取部分地区试点探 索"三书同达""掌上办""并联修复"等工作，为提升信用修复效能提供实践经验和创新成果。截至今年10 月底，全国市场监管部门累计修复4416万户经营主体，助力重塑良好信用。 《办法》共31条，分为四个部分 ...

Core Viewpoint - The joint release of the "Opinions on Handling Criminal Cases of Refusing to Execute Judgments and Rulings" by the Supreme Court, Supreme Procuratorate, and Ministry of Public Security aims to strengthen the punishment for refusal to execute judgments, addressing the long-standing issue of "execution difficulties" and reinforcing the authority of the law [1][2]. Group 1: Legal Framework and Enforcement - The "Opinions" clarify the standards for applying criminal liability for refusal to execute judgments, evidence rules, and procedural connections, enhancing the punitive measures against such behaviors [1]. - There has been a historical tendency to prioritize civil execution over criminal accountability, leading to insufficient coordination among departments, which complicates evidence collection and case transfer [1][2]. - The new mechanism aims to provide better evidence collection support for creditors and to ease the burden of proof in self-reported cases of debtor crimes [2]. Group 2: Systematic Approach to Execution Challenges - Addressing execution difficulties requires a comprehensive approach that combines punishment with education, and short-term measures with long-term solutions [2]. - The establishment of a credit supervision system that imposes restrictions on dishonest executors is essential to ensure compliance with judicial rulings [2]. - A collaborative governance model involving various stakeholders, including the Party, the People's Congress, and the government, is necessary to uphold legal authority and promote social integrity [2]. Group 3: Technological Integration - The integration of technology is crucial in tackling execution challenges, with a focus on enhancing information systems for asset tracking and utilizing big data and AI for analyzing refusal to execute cases [3]. - The promotion of "smart execution" models aims to increase transparency and efficiency in the execution process, ensuring that judicial decisions are effectively enforced [3]. - The ultimate goal is to foster a societal culture where trust is valued and dishonesty is stigmatized, thereby reinforcing the principles of fairness and justice [3].