Workflow
种族平权政策
icon
Search documents
哈佛人杀死哈佛
Hu Xiu· 2025-08-13 01:40
Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the conflict between the Trump administration and Harvard University, highlighting the role of May Mailman, a Harvard graduate, in implementing policies aimed at reshaping the university's operations and challenging its diversity initiatives [1][4][6]. Group 1: May Mailman's Background and Role - May Mailman, a 37-year-old Harvard graduate, has been a key figure in the Trump administration's strategy against elite universities, particularly Harvard [2][3]. - Mailman has a background in law and political consulting, having worked closely with Stephen Miller during Trump's first term and later serving as Ohio's Deputy Attorney General [3][4]. - In 2025, she returned to the Trump administration as a senior policy strategist, focusing on enforcing strict compliance standards for universities [3][6]. Group 2: Strategies Against Harvard - The Trump administration, leveraging federal funding and civil rights investigations, has pressured Harvard to comply with its policy demands, with Mailman as the architect of these strategies [4][6]. - Mailman has drafted executive orders that redefine gender policies and limit diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives, targeting not only Harvard but also other prestigious universities [4][6]. - Harvard has resisted these pressures, becoming the only university publicly opposing the Trump administration's demands, despite facing significant external pressure [4][5]. Group 3: Broader Implications and Reactions - Mailman's actions have sparked controversy, with some alumni and conservative groups supporting her stance against Harvard's perceived leftist tendencies, while students and faculty have expressed opposition [7][8]. - The ongoing debate over Harvard's admissions policies, particularly regarding racial considerations, has been reignited by Mailman's initiatives, which aim to force changes through federal authority [8]. - The ideological conflict within Harvard, exacerbated by external pressures, has made the institution more vulnerable to the challenges posed by Mailman's strategies [8].