美国知名保守派智库传统基金会近期出现人事震荡，多名高层人员集体跳槽至由共和党籍前副总统迈克 ·彭斯创办的一个组织，还有不少人主动辞职。 据报道，传统基金会一个多月来内部争议颇多，导火索是罗伯茨为福克斯新闻频道前主持人塔克·卡尔 森专访保守派网红尼克·富恩特斯作辩护。卡尔森在专访中对富恩特斯态度友好，而富恩特斯是白人至 上主义者，常发表极端言论。 据美国《华尔街日报》和《华盛顿邮报》报道，跳槽至彭斯创办的"推进美国自由"组织的人员包括传统 基金会法律与司法研究中心主管约翰·马尔科姆及其团队部分人员，数据分析中心主管凯文·达亚拉特 纳，经济政策研究所主管理查德·斯特恩，共13人。 传统基金会在华盛顿政治圈拥有重要影响力，曾深度参与制定保守派政策纲领"2025计划"。报道说，特 朗普虽然反对该计划，但其施政措施在某些方面与该计划相符合。"推进美国自由"为彭斯因2021年"国 会山骚乱"事件与特朗普决裂后创立，比传统基金会规模小。 彭斯告诉《华尔街日报》，传统基金会已"抛弃了原则"，因支持孤立主义、停止支持乌克兰等理念 而"堕落"。 此外，传统基金会美国宪法专家乔希·布莱克曼，法律与司法研究中心高管查尔斯·斯廷森和汉 ...

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the conflict between the Trump administration and Harvard University, highlighting the role of May Mailman, a Harvard graduate, in implementing policies aimed at reshaping the university's operations and challenging its diversity initiatives [1][4][6]. Group 1: May Mailman's Background and Role - May Mailman, a 37-year-old Harvard graduate, has been a key figure in the Trump administration's strategy against elite universities, particularly Harvard [2][3]. - Mailman has a background in law and political consulting, having worked closely with Stephen Miller during Trump's first term and later serving as Ohio's Deputy Attorney General [3][4]. - In 2025, she returned to the Trump administration as a senior policy strategist, focusing on enforcing strict compliance standards for universities [3][6]. Group 2: Strategies Against Harvard - The Trump administration, leveraging federal funding and civil rights investigations, has pressured Harvard to comply with its policy demands, with Mailman as the architect of these strategies [4][6]. - Mailman has drafted executive orders that redefine gender policies and limit diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives, targeting not only Harvard but also other prestigious universities [4][6]. - Harvard has resisted these pressures, becoming the only university publicly opposing the Trump administration's demands, despite facing significant external pressure [4][5]. Group 3: Broader Implications and Reactions - Mailman's actions have sparked controversy, with some alumni and conservative groups supporting her stance against Harvard's perceived leftist tendencies, while students and faculty have expressed opposition [7][8]. - The ongoing debate over Harvard's admissions policies, particularly regarding racial considerations, has been reignited by Mailman's initiatives, which aim to force changes through federal authority [8]. - The ideological conflict within Harvard, exacerbated by external pressures, has made the institution more vulnerable to the challenges posed by Mailman's strategies [8].