多样性

Search documents
哈佛人杀死哈佛
Hu Xiu· 2025-08-13 01:40
Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the conflict between the Trump administration and Harvard University, highlighting the role of May Mailman, a Harvard graduate, in implementing policies aimed at reshaping the university's operations and challenging its diversity initiatives [1][4][6]. Group 1: May Mailman's Background and Role - May Mailman, a 37-year-old Harvard graduate, has been a key figure in the Trump administration's strategy against elite universities, particularly Harvard [2][3]. - Mailman has a background in law and political consulting, having worked closely with Stephen Miller during Trump's first term and later serving as Ohio's Deputy Attorney General [3][4]. - In 2025, she returned to the Trump administration as a senior policy strategist, focusing on enforcing strict compliance standards for universities [3][6]. Group 2: Strategies Against Harvard - The Trump administration, leveraging federal funding and civil rights investigations, has pressured Harvard to comply with its policy demands, with Mailman as the architect of these strategies [4][6]. - Mailman has drafted executive orders that redefine gender policies and limit diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives, targeting not only Harvard but also other prestigious universities [4][6]. - Harvard has resisted these pressures, becoming the only university publicly opposing the Trump administration's demands, despite facing significant external pressure [4][5]. Group 3: Broader Implications and Reactions - Mailman's actions have sparked controversy, with some alumni and conservative groups supporting her stance against Harvard's perceived leftist tendencies, while students and faculty have expressed opposition [7][8]. - The ongoing debate over Harvard's admissions policies, particularly regarding racial considerations, has been reignited by Mailman's initiatives, which aim to force changes through federal authority [8]. - The ideological conflict within Harvard, exacerbated by external pressures, has made the institution more vulnerable to the challenges posed by Mailman's strategies [8].
特朗普下令阻止“觉醒”式AI
Xin Hua She· 2025-07-25 12:34
Group 1 - The U.S. government has released an AI action plan aimed at preventing "woke" AI, with President Trump signing several related executive orders [1][2] - The action plan requires the National Institute of Standards and Technology to revise the AI risk management framework, removing references to misinformation, diversity, equity, inclusion, and climate change [1] - The White House has stated that federal departments will only procure "unbiased" large language models, ensuring that Americans receive "reliable, objective" information [2] Group 2 - Major AI companies in the U.S. are taking a cautious stance regarding the executive orders aimed at stopping "woke" AI, with some awaiting more specific policy guidance [3] - Microsoft has declined to comment on the matter, indicating a level of uncertainty within the industry regarding the implications of the new policies [3]
你不知道的美国(14)科技巨头失去反骨
日经中文网· 2025-06-26 07:10
Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the growing divide between tech company leadership and employees in Silicon Valley, particularly in the context of political pressures and changes in corporate culture under the Trump administration. Group 1: Corporate Response to Political Pressure - Tech leaders, including Mark Zuckerberg of Meta, have shown compliance with the Trump administration to avoid negative business impacts, leading to a shift in corporate policies regarding diversity and inclusion [1][4] - Employees at Meta have expressed silent protests against leadership decisions, such as the removal of gender-specific hygiene products, indicating a growing discontent with management's alignment with government policies [3][4] Group 2: Employee Discontent and Corporate Culture - A Meta engineer was terminated for sharing internal information, highlighting a growing tension between the company's emphasis on control and the previously encouraged culture of openness [5] - The internal assessment at Meta indicated a plan to lay off 5% of underperforming employees, raising fears among staff about job security and the potential for being targeted for non-compliance [5][6] Group 3: Shift in Employee Dynamics - The article notes that the majority of tech employees in Silicon Valley are foreign nationals, which complicates their ability to voice dissent due to immigration concerns [6][7] - Political discussions have largely disappeared from workplace forums, with employees fearing repercussions for speaking out against corporate decisions [6] Group 4: Decline of Open Corporate Culture - The once-open culture of companies like Google has shifted, with areas of their headquarters now restricted to employees only, reflecting a move towards increased security and control [9][10] - The article suggests that the current leadership's focus on political alignment and business stability may stifle innovation, leading to a potential decline in the competitive edge of these tech giants [11]
支持欧洲价值观就是支持ESG!欧洲650亿美元规模“老钱”警告美国资管机构
Hua Er Jie Jian Wen· 2025-05-27 00:28
Group 1 - European investors are warning the U.S. asset management industry about potential divestment if they yield to the Trump administration's policies, particularly regarding climate change and governance principles [1][2] - The Dutch pension fund PME is reassessing its €5 billion investment with BlackRock due to concerns over the firm's lack of condemnation of Trump's actions related to climate and judicial issues [2][3] - PME's senior strategist highlighted a clear divide between European and U.S. asset management firms in terms of engagement, active ownership, and climate initiatives [2][3] Group 2 - PME is implementing a new screening mechanism to ensure its investment portfolio aligns with European values and ESG standards, significantly reducing its investable stock universe by about two-thirds to around 1,000 stocks [4] - The new screening will exclude passive stock investments in emerging markets due to uncontrollable ESG risks [4] - PME is also reviewing the performance of its external managers, particularly U.S. asset management firms, in light of their alignment with current U.S. policies [4] Group 3 - The quality and transparency of ESG disclosures are becoming critical factors for institutional investors' decision-making processes [6][7] - PME has indicated that if U.S. firms cease to disclose diversity, equity, and climate-related data, it will reconsider its investment decisions [6] - The current situation may signify the beginning of a divergence in the global asset management industry, marking a new phase of competition between European investors and U.S. asset management giants [7]