Group 1 - The core viewpoint emphasizes the need for effective and sustainable reduction of burdens on grassroots levels by identifying root causes and implementing appropriate measures [1] - Addressing formalism should avoid falling into the trap of addressing formalism with more formalism, such as requiring lower-level units to self-report and self-solve issues, which may prevent them from tackling real problems [2] - The reduction of burdens is not about eliminating necessary tasks but rather streamlining processes and clarifying responsibilities to enhance efficiency [2] Group 2 - There is a shift in mindset needed at the grassroots level, moving from merely reporting and holding meetings to providing practical support and collaborative problem-solving [3] - The importance of forming a collective effort across different levels and departments is highlighted, focusing on solving urgent issues faced by the public [3] - Properly arranged duty schedules are essential for maintaining work continuity and service quality, but some areas have mismanaged this by creating ineffective duty practices [4][5] Group 3 - The need for a classification management mechanism for duty arrangements is emphasized, ensuring that emergency departments have dedicated personnel while allowing flexibility for others [5] - A well-structured duty system can foster a positive working atmosphere, enabling staff to dedicate more time and energy to development and public service [6]