Group 1 - The article discusses the challenges of discussing China's economic issues, highlighting that Chinese scholars are often labeled as representatives of Western capitalism due to the lack of a systematic Eastern economic theory [2] - It emphasizes that all economic theories, including those in natural and social sciences, are predominantly based on Western frameworks, suggesting a need to avoid politicizing and populating academic discourse [2][4] - The article argues that economic laws are universal and not bound by ideological positions, indicating that adherence to outdated economic practices, such as land finance in real estate, can lead to market failures [4][8] Group 2 - There is a call for the development of a distinct Chinese economic theory that can stand alongside Western theories, contributing to the global economic discourse [6] - The article questions whether existing Marxist economic teachings in China can evolve to be more relevant and applicable to contemporary economic practices, suggesting a need for modernization and adaptation [6] - It asserts that economic principles, such as supply and demand, are not influenced by cultural or ideological perspectives, reinforcing the idea that market dynamics will prevail regardless of theoretical frameworks [8]