Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the articles highlights the escalation of military confrontation between Thailand and Cambodia, marking the most severe conflict in over a decade, with both sides accusing each other of initiating hostilities [1][2][3] - The conflict has resulted in significant casualties, with reports indicating over 20 Thai civilians killed, and both nations emphasizing their actions as self-defense [1][2] - The Thai government is currently focused on bilateral dialogue with Cambodia, rejecting third-party mediation despite expressions of willingness from other nations to assist [1][2][3] Group 2 - The historical context of the conflict is rooted in territorial disputes over an 800-kilometer border, dating back to colonial-era maps that have led to ongoing disagreements [4][5] - Recent political turmoil in Thailand, including the suspension of Prime Minister Pita Limjaroenrat and the fallout from the "recording scandal," has exacerbated tensions and complicated diplomatic relations [6][8][9] - The military capabilities of both nations are highlighted, with Thailand possessing a larger active military force, yet Cambodia's military has shown resilience and adaptability in the challenging terrain [11][12][13] Group 3 - The involvement of regional leaders, such as Malaysia's Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim, indicates a potential for diplomatic intervention, although the effectiveness of ASEAN in mediating the conflict remains uncertain [14][15] - The articles suggest that personal relationships between political leaders, particularly between Thaksin Shinawatra and Hun Sen, play a significant role in the dynamics of the conflict [7][10][16] - The potential for a peaceful resolution is acknowledged, with both nations recognizing the detrimental effects of prolonged conflict on their development and regional stability [12][14][15]