Group 1 - The article highlights the significant reduction in the number of meetings and the improvement in meeting quality in the village since 2013, following the implementation of the Central Eight Regulations [1][2] - The village has established strict guidelines to control meeting duration and ensure that discussions are concise and focused on practical issues and solutions [2] - The presence of supervisory bodies, such as the discipline inspection committee, has led to a more effective monitoring of meeting practices, reducing formalism and allowing for more time to address community needs [2]

Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes the importance of reducing formalism and streamlining meetings to alleviate the burden on grassroots levels, enhancing practical work and accountability [3][6][8] Group 1: Implementation of Policies - The central government has integrated the reduction of formalism with alleviating burdens on grassroots as a key aspect of party conduct, issuing regulations to limit document length, meeting size, and duration [3][4] - New disciplinary measures have been introduced to penalize violations of the streamlined meeting and document policies, signaling a zero-tolerance approach to formalism and bureaucratism [3][6] - Various regions have begun to implement these policies, with local governments conducting inspections to ensure compliance and effectiveness [6][8] Group 2: Practical Changes and Outcomes - In Longcheng City, the number of documents and office supplies used has been halved in the first half of the year, indicating a significant reduction in bureaucratic overhead [5] - Grassroots workers report a decrease in the volume of documents and meetings, allowing them more time to engage with the community and address pressing issues [5][6] - The practice of merging meetings and reducing their frequency has become standard, leading to more focused discussions and improved efficiency [6][7] Group 3: Challenges and Future Directions - Despite progress, some areas still experience issues with excessive meetings and documentation, necessitating ongoing monitoring and reform [4][6] - A comprehensive approach is required to address the root causes of formalism, with a focus on continuous improvement and accountability [6][7] - Local governments are encouraged to adopt a problem-oriented approach, ensuring that meetings and documents serve practical purposes and drive effective action [7][8]

Group 1 - The core viewpoint emphasizes the importance of reducing bureaucratic burdens through the "精文减会" initiative, which aims to streamline documentation and meetings to enhance efficiency and effectiveness in grassroots governance [3][4][5] - Since the 18th National Congress, the initiative has been integrated with the fight against formalism, leading to a significant reduction in the number of documents and meetings, thereby improving the work environment for officials [3][4][5] - The implementation of strict regulations and guidelines has resulted in a notable decrease in the frequency and duration of meetings, as well as a reduction in associated costs, promoting a culture of concise and practical communication [3][4][5] Group 2 - Despite progress, there are still hidden issues of formalism and bureaucratic practices in some areas, indicating the need for ongoing vigilance and reform [8][10] - Specific problems include excessive meetings, superficial compliance with directives, and a tendency to increase meeting specifications unnecessarily, which burdens grassroots officials [9][10] - The persistence of these issues is attributed to misaligned performance metrics, where some leaders prioritize quantity over quality in documentation and meetings, leading to inefficiencies [10][11] Group 3 - To ensure the effectiveness of the "精文减会" initiative, continuous supervision and accountability measures are essential, including dynamic monitoring of document and meeting practices [12][13] - Strengthening the responsibility of leadership and enhancing the quality of documents and meetings are critical to achieving the desired outcomes of the initiative [14][15] - The focus should be on practical results, with an emphasis on reducing unnecessary documentation and meetings while ensuring that essential communication remains effective [17][18][19]