Core Viewpoint - The Supreme Court of China has emphasized that both physical and psychological violence constitute domestic violence, highlighting the importance of recognizing mental abuse as a serious issue in domestic settings [1][5]. Group 1: Case Summaries - The case of Mou Linhan (牟林翰) is noted as a significant example of psychological abuse, where continuous verbal humiliation led to the victim's suicide, resulting in a conviction for abuse [4][5]. - Another case involved a husband threatening self-harm, which was classified as psychological violence, demonstrating that threats of self-harm can create a climate of fear and control within domestic relationships [6][5]. - A case involving Xu (许) and Zheng (郑) highlighted the court's recognition of the value of domestic labor, awarding compensation to the victim for her contributions as a full-time homemaker and acknowledging the impact of domestic violence on her life [8][9]. Group 2: Legal Implications - The Supreme Court's ruling indicates that individuals in stable cohabiting relationships can be recognized as "family members" under the law, expanding the definition of domestic violence to include psychological abuse [4][10]. - The court's decisions reflect a commitment to protecting victims of domestic violence, ensuring that psychological abuse is treated with the same seriousness as physical violence [5][9]. - The rulings also align with international standards, such as the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women, emphasizing the need for legal recognition of women's contributions in domestic settings [9][10].

Core Viewpoint - The Supreme Court of China has released eight typical cases related to domestic violence, emphasizing that domestic violence is a violation of personal rights and should not be considered merely a family dispute. The cases highlight the recognition of both physical and psychological abuse as forms of domestic violence [3][4]. Group 1 - Domestic violence is defined as illegal or criminal behavior that infringes on personal rights, regardless of whether it occurs inside or outside the home. Psychological abuse, such as humiliation and degradation, is also recognized as domestic violence [3][4]. - The Supreme Court emphasizes the importance of accurately assessing the characteristics of domestic violence cases and allows for expert testimony to aid in evidence evaluation. This includes cases where the victim's statements are central to the evidence chain [4]. - Special attention is given to the judicial protection of vulnerable groups, particularly minors, reinforcing the principle of maximizing the interests of minors in domestic violence cases [4].

Group 1 - The Supreme Court of China has released a set of typical cases related to domestic violence, including the widely publicized Liu Linhan case, to highlight the legal framework and judicial approach to such cases [1] - The Supreme Court emphasizes that domestic violence is not merely a family dispute and includes psychological abuse, asserting that all forms of violence, whether physical or mental, are illegal [1] - The essence of domestic violence is control, which encompasses both physical acts like beating and psychological acts such as verbal abuse and intimidation [1] Group 2 - The Supreme Court stresses the importance of accurately assessing the characteristics of domestic violence cases and allows for expert testimony to aid in evidence evaluation [2] - In cases involving minors, the judiciary focuses on protecting vulnerable groups and adheres to the principle of maximizing the interests of minors, recognizing that violent discipline constitutes domestic violence [2] - The court acknowledges the value of domestic labor and provides dual protections for women who have sacrificed career opportunities due to long-term domestic responsibilities [2]

Core Viewpoint - The Supreme People's Court of China has clarified that domestic violence is not merely a family dispute and that psychological abuse is also considered domestic violence [1][2] Group 1: Legal Clarifications - The Supreme Court released eight typical cases of domestic violence, emphasizing that acts of psychological torment, such as humiliation and degradation, should be classified as abuse [1] - In the case of "Mou's abuse case," the perpetrator was sentenced for severe abuse leading to the victim's death, highlighting the legal consequences of such actions [1] - The court stated that domestic violence is a violation of personal rights and is illegal regardless of whether it occurs inside or outside the home [1] Group 2: Protection of Vulnerable Groups - The court is focusing on judicial protection for vulnerable family members, particularly minors, and is committed to the principle of maximizing the interests of minors [1] - In the case "Li vs. Pang," the court recognized violent discipline by the primary caregiver as domestic violence [2] - The case "Ji vs. Su" demonstrated the judicial support for changing custody arrangements to prevent the intergenerational transmission of violence [1][2] Group 3: Financial Compensation for Victims - In the case "Xu vs. Zheng," the court ensured financial compensation for a victimized full-time homemaker, including compensation for household labor and damages from the divorce [2] - The Supreme Court aims to compensate women who have sacrificed career opportunities due to long-term domestic responsibilities, providing dual protection for abused homemakers [2]