Core Viewpoint - The U.S. Court of Appeals ruled that most of the global tariff policies implemented by President Trump were illegal, stating that he exceeded his authority in imposing these tariffs [3]. Summary by Relevant Sections - The Appeals Court upheld a previous ruling by the International Trade Court, which found that Trump improperly invoked an emergency powers law to implement these tariffs [3]. - The International Trade Court had previously blocked the tariff policy announced on April 2, citing that the U.S. Constitution grants Congress exclusive power to regulate trade with other nations, and the emergency powers claimed by the President do not supersede this authority [3]. - The Appeals Court has agreed to stay the ruling until October 14, allowing the government time to appeal to the Supreme Court [3].

Core Viewpoint - The U.S. Court of Appeals ruled that most of the global tariff policies implemented by President Trump were illegal, stating that he exceeded his authority in imposing these tariffs [1][3]. Group 1: Legal Rulings - A panel of judges in Washington upheld a previous ruling by the International Trade Court, which found that Trump improperly invoked an emergency powers law to impose these tariffs [3]. - The U.S. Court of Appeals agreed to stay the ruling until October 14, allowing the government time to appeal to the Supreme Court [3]. - The International Trade Court had previously blocked the tariff policy announced by Trump on April 2, citing that the U.S. Constitution grants Congress exclusive power to regulate trade with other nations [3]. Group 2: Implications of the Ruling - The ruling indicates a significant limitation on presidential powers regarding trade policies, emphasizing that emergency powers claimed by the president do not override congressional authority [3].