Core Viewpoint - The article highlights the exemplary work of Jiang Qiangqiang, a director at the Discipline Inspection Commission of Qiaocheng District, Bozhou City, Anhui Province, emphasizing his commitment to integrity and effective governance in tackling corruption and improving local governance [1][3]. Group 1: Achievements and Initiatives - Jiang Qiangqiang has handled over 200 problem clues and more than 10 serious disciplinary cases since his transfer to the Discipline Inspection Commission in December 2017, achieving a balance between case quality and conflict resolution [1]. - In early 2018, he led the establishment of a collaborative inspection area to strengthen supervision at the grassroots level, addressing issues like weak oversight and the challenges of a "familiar society" [2]. - Jiang's innovative approach included cross-disciplinary law enforcement to enhance the effectiveness of the collaborative inspection area, resulting in the creation of detailed work checklists that were adopted citywide [2]. Group 2: Case Handling and Methodology - During a national campaign against corruption in the grain purchasing sector in 2021, Jiang faced significant challenges due to a lack of prior cases in this area, yet he employed a methodical approach to gather evidence and uncover misconduct [3][4]. - Jiang's team successfully identified a former company executive involved in embezzling 1.3 million yuan by manipulating grain purchase records, demonstrating his commitment to thorough investigation and evidence collection [4]. - He emphasizes that the goal of case handling is not merely punitive but to promote governance improvements, advocating for a comprehensive approach to address systemic issues revealed during investigations [4][6]. Group 3: Educational and Preventive Measures - Jiang has implemented educational initiatives to raise awareness about the consequences of corruption among local officials, using case studies to illustrate risks and promote compliance [5]. - After concluding investigations, he analyzes the underlying risks and regulatory gaps, providing targeted recommendations to enhance oversight and prevent future violations [5][6]. - His work has led to a systematic approach to governance, focusing on both accountability and the promotion of ethical practices within local government [6].

Core Viewpoint - The article highlights the efforts of the Jin'an District Commission for Discipline Inspection and Supervision in Anhui Province to address corruption and improve governance in land acquisition and resettlement processes, emphasizing the establishment of a collaborative supervision model to enhance efficiency and accountability in handling complaints and cases [1][2][4]. Group 1: Supervision and Governance - The Jin'an District has identified issues such as inadequate performance and misuse of power among local officials in land acquisition and resettlement, prompting a comprehensive review and corrective measures [1]. - A collaborative supervision model called "one unified and five linked" has been implemented to address challenges like high personnel turnover and varying case handling capabilities within grassroots disciplinary inspection and supervision institutions [2]. - The establishment of a management platform for rural collective assets has been initiated, involving over 300 villages and communities, with more than 16,000 entries related to fixed assets amounting to approximately 39.87 billion [5]. Group 2: Case Handling and Training - A specific case involving the former Party Secretary of Jianlai Community, who fraudulently claimed compensation for land acquisition, was investigated, leading to his expulsion from the Party and referral for criminal prosecution [3]. - The Jin'an District Commission has focused on enhancing the capabilities of its staff through hands-on training and experience sharing, resulting in over 120 training sessions and participation in 143 case investigations in 2024 [6]. - The collaborative supervision model has not only improved case handling efficiency but also played a significant role in daily oversight, including a recent inspection of food safety in schools, leading to the identification of 36 issues and accountability for five individuals [4][5].