Workflow
网络谣言治理
icon
Search documents
网传进入云南玉溪城区要收维护费?谣言!专家:此类谣言需多方共同治理
Yang Shi Xin Wen· 2025-08-22 23:16
云南省玉溪市拥有抚仙湖、哀牢山等国家级景区和丰富的生态文化资源,是比较热门的旅游城市。 但是前段时间,有人发了一段视频,声称进入玉溪城区需要缴纳费用,这是真的吗? "为了响应国家号召,即日起玉溪市政府决定:凡是进入城区的必须缴纳200元的城镇维护费用,该费用可以在5年内随意出入玉溪城区!500元可以一辈子随 意出入玉溪!" 日前,这段由抖音账号"玉溪《都市传媒》广告公司"上传的视频,一经发布,迅速引发大量网民的关注和讨论。一些网友质疑"什么时候开始要交进城费 了",还有一些网友直接艾特了玉溪警方进行关注。 监测到该消息后,玉溪市公安局红塔分局网安大队立即进行了核查。 玉溪市公安局红塔分局网安大队副大队长 王朝安:当时我们就觉得不真实,第一时间咨询相关部门信息的真实性,确认是谣言后,我们及时对这个账号开 展工作。发现发布此谣言信息的是李某某,我们及时组织警力,赶到嫌疑人居住地将其查获。 民警告诉记者,玉溪虽然是旅游热门城市,但是只有部分特定的景区需要购票进入,大多数古街区都不需要收费,这类进城收费的消息站不住脚。 而且这种涉及公共政策类的消息,也会由政府部门向全社会公布。 为蹭流量编造相关谣言 被行政处罚 那么 ...
比亚迪回应失控传闻:刹车系统功能正常
财联社· 2025-07-24 14:55
Core Viewpoint - The incident at Chengdu Tianfu Airport involving a BYD vehicle has been clarified, confirming that the vehicle's braking system is functioning normally and the event is unrelated to the vehicle itself [1] Group 1 - The vehicle was safely parked by the owner, and there were no collisions or injuries reported [1] - BYD has collected evidence against the spread of false information and is urging media and internet users to delete the misleading content [1] - The company plans to pursue legal action against those who spread rumors and false information [1]
罗某良,被依法查处
券商中国· 2025-07-11 01:27
Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the spread of a false rumor predicting an 8.0 magnitude earthquake in Guangdong, leading to public panic and subsequent legal actions against those responsible for disseminating the misinformation [1]. Group 1 - A screenshot claiming that an academic predicted an 8.0 magnitude earthquake in Guangdong was circulated online, causing significant public concern [1]. - The individual responsible for the initial post, identified as Luo, was administratively punished by local authorities for creating and spreading the rumor [1]. - Other individuals, including Kuang, Hu, and Zhang, were also penalized for sharing the unverified information, contributing to the rumor's further spread [1]. Group 2 - The Cyber Police issued a reminder that the internet is not a lawless space, emphasizing the need for compliance with legal regulations when posting information online [1]. - The authorities warned that those who fabricate and disseminate false information that disrupts social order will face legal consequences, especially if the impact is severe [1]. - The article encourages the public to refrain from creating, believing, or spreading rumors to maintain a clear online environment [1].
“保送清北班的孙老师”,被拘留!
第一财经· 2025-07-10 04:15
Core Viewpoint - The article discusses a recent incident involving a live-streaming influencer who falsely claimed that payment could secure admission into prestigious educational programs, leading to public disorder and legal consequences for the individual involved [2][3][4]. Group 1 - The Chengdu Public Security Bureau launched an investigation following claims made by an influencer that payment could guarantee entry into elite classes at top universities [1][2]. - The individual, identified as Sun, a 36-year-old head of an education consulting company, fabricated claims to gain attention and disrupt public order, resulting in complaints from anxious parents [3]. - Authorities emphasized that the online space is not exempt from the law, and actions that spread rumors and disturb public order will face strict legal repercussions [4].
假冒仿冒韦东奕,超5000个账号被处理
中国基金报· 2025-07-09 08:15
Group 1 - The article highlights the focus of online rumors in June 2025, which primarily revolve around social hotspots, disaster incidents, and pseudo-science, with perpetrators using techniques like AI generation and misinformation to distort facts [1] - Relevant authorities have responded swiftly by implementing measures such as authoritative information dissemination and inter-departmental law enforcement to combat rumor spreading, thereby reinforcing a clear online environment [1] - Various departments, including internet and public security agencies, are collaborating to address the issue of rumors, with the Central Cyberspace Administration of China taking action against the misuse of AI technology, resulting in the disposal of over 3,500 non-compliant AI products and the removal of over 960,000 illegal pieces of information [1] Group 2 - The article mentions the importance of rational participation in online discussions and the need for careful discernment to maintain a clear online environment, as emphasized by the China Internet Joint Rumor Refutation Platform [2] - It provides a brief profile of Wei Dongyi, a 33-year-old assistant professor and researcher at Peking University, highlighting his strong mathematical analysis and computational skills, as well as his research focus on partial differential equations and geometric analysis [2] - Wei Dongyi has published multiple papers in international mathematics journals and is recognized as a promising young scholar [2]
17人被处罚!云南警方曝光10起网络造谣案!
Yang Shi Wang· 2025-07-04 02:10
Core Viewpoint - Yunnan police have publicly exposed 10 typical cases of combating and rectifying online rumors, emphasizing the importance of maintaining order in cyberspace and protecting the legitimate rights of the public [1][2]. Group 1: Law Enforcement Actions - The Yunnan police have implemented the "Net Clean-2025" initiative to rigorously combat illegal activities related to online rumors, aiming to create a strong atmosphere against such behavior [2]. - Specific cases include individuals like Zhao and Li, who fabricated a false police report about a missing wife for attention, leading to administrative penalties [4]. - Another case involved individuals creating a fake video of a knife attack, which caused public panic and resulted in administrative penalties for the perpetrators [6]. Group 2: Types of Rumors - Various types of rumors were identified, including false claims about fireworks causing deaths, which were spread by individuals seeking attention, leading to public disorder [8][11]. - Rumors about food poisoning in schools were also fabricated, impacting local education and resulting in legal consequences for the individual involved [14]. - Other notable cases included false reports of finding abandoned infants and misleading claims about traffic accidents, all aimed at gaining online visibility [17][20]. Group 3: Public Awareness and Compliance - The police have issued reminders to the public about the legal boundaries of internet use, urging netizens to refrain from creating, spreading, or believing in rumors [29]. - The overarching message promotes a culture of "no rumors, no belief in rumors, no transmission of rumors," reinforcing the need for lawful online behavior [2][29].
“工行假金条”!公安部最新通报!
中国基金报· 2025-07-02 09:32
Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the recent crackdown on online rumors by the Ministry of Public Security in China, highlighting the "ICBC fake gold bar" rumor case as a significant example of misinformation that impacted public perception and the operations of related institutions [2][5]. Group 1: Incident Overview - The "ICBC fake gold bar" rumor originated from an individual named Chen, who spread false information on a short video platform claiming that gold bars purchased from the Industrial and Commercial Bank of China (ICBC) contained impurities [5]. - The rumor misled many internet users and affected the normal operations of the bank, prompting legal action against the individual responsible for the misinformation [5][6]. Group 2: Bank's Response - ICBC's Shanghai Jiading Branch issued a statement clarifying that the gold bars in question were tested and confirmed to have a gold content of 99.99%, indicating no quality issues [7]. - The bank explained that the suspected impurities were merely external attachments that had fallen off after professional cleaning, a conclusion that was accepted by the customer involved [7].
记者调查:“骑手悲惨生活”有专门剧本和演员定制?|聚焦短视频乱象治理
Huan Qiu Wang· 2025-07-01 00:45
Core Viewpoint - The recent initiative by the Central Cyberspace Administration of China aims to address malicious marketing practices in the short video sector, particularly focusing on false portrayals and misleading narratives surrounding flexible employment groups like delivery workers and ride-hailing drivers [1][2][3]. Group 1: Malicious Marketing Practices - A significant number of short videos falsely depict the struggles of flexible employment groups, often using scripted narratives to attract views and engagement [2][4]. - The portrayal of flexible employment workers in distressing situations, such as "delivery riders collapsing" or "couriers with sick children," has been identified as a common tactic to generate sympathy and views, despite being fabricated [2][4][6]. - The rise of such content has led to a 150% annual increase in rumors related to flexible employment groups, indicating a growing trend of misinformation [13]. Group 2: Content Creation and Distribution - Many of these misleading videos are produced by teams that specialize in creating dramatic narratives, often involving conflict and emotional manipulation to gain traction on social media [10][11]. - The low cost of production and the ease of scriptwriting contribute to the proliferation of these videos, making it simple for creators to generate content that misrepresents the realities of flexible employment [12][13]. - Some accounts have been found to employ tactics such as hiring actors and using pre-written scripts to fabricate scenarios that resonate with viewers [11][12]. Group 3: Regulatory and Governance Measures - The Central Cyberspace Administration has issued guidelines to regulate self-media, emphasizing the need for authenticity and the prohibition of misleading content [14][15]. - Despite existing regulations, enforcement remains weak, with many accounts quickly re-establishing themselves after being banned for spreading false information [15][17]. - Experts suggest that platforms should enhance their content review processes and implement stricter measures to prevent the spread of false narratives, including the use of AI and blockchain technology for verification [16][17].
网上“砖家”谁来管?(“融”观中国)
Core Viewpoint - The article highlights the growing issue of "pseudo-experts" and misinformation in various fields, particularly in medical, financial, and agricultural sectors, emphasizing the need for effective governance and collaboration among different stakeholders to combat this problem [5][9][10]. Group 1: Pseudo-Expert Phenomenon - The rise of "pseudo-experts" is attributed to the increasing number of individuals seeking professional advice online, leading to the emergence of misleading information and fraudulent personas [5][10]. - In the medical field, individuals without professional backgrounds are posing as health experts, spreading unverified information and potentially harmful advice [9]. - In finance, fake personas are created to gain trust and sell courses or solicit investments, often leading to scams [9]. Group 2: Governance and Responsibility - Content creators are primarily responsible for the dissemination of false information and may face legal consequences for their actions [11]. - Multi-Channel Network (MCN) agencies can also be held accountable if they are found to be complicit in the creation and distribution of misleading content [11]. - Online platforms have a crucial role in managing and regulating content, as they can monitor user activity and enforce compliance with content standards [12]. Group 3: Current Efforts and Challenges - Various platforms are implementing measures to combat false personas, such as verification processes and content removal [13]. - Despite these efforts, the challenge remains significant due to the difficulty in identifying and verifying false information [13]. - Collaboration among different sectors and proactive measures are essential to effectively address the spread of misinformation [15][16]. Group 4: Sector-Specific Implications - Misinformation in critical areas like healthcare and finance can lead to severe consequences, including public distrust and economic instability [14]. - The need for a shift from reactive to proactive strategies in managing misinformation is emphasized, with a focus on collaboration among industry leaders and regulatory bodies [15][16].
散布问界沈阳车展虚假言论!赛力斯:3人被公安机关处罚
证券时报· 2025-06-27 08:30
Group 1 - The legal department of Seres Automotive announced that three individuals were penalized for spreading false information about the AITO Wenjie brand, damaging the company's and users' rights, and disrupting market order [1] - Seres emphasized its commitment to combating illegal actions that tarnish the Wenjie brand and to maintaining a fair and orderly competitive environment in the industry [1] - An incident occurred at the Liaoning Shenyang Industrial Exhibition where a Wenjie M7 Pro vehicle was involved in a collision, resulting in one injury [3] Group 2 - The collision incident was attributed to the vehicle not being in exhibition mode, leading to an accidental activation, and the driver not wearing a seatbelt, which prevented the AEB system from triggering [3]