Workflow
网络谣言治理
icon
Search documents
郑州辟谣
证券时报· 2025-11-23 11:01
网传"小乔地铁站附近车祸致8人死亡"为谣言。 近日,网络平台账号"繁花如梦"发布信息称"小乔地铁站小米M7拿下8杀,创造单车最高击杀纪录"。经新郑市相关部门核实,该事件发生于2025年5月21日,因驾驶 员操作失误造成4人受伤,无人员死亡。网传相关信息均为谣言,请大家不造谣、不信谣、不传谣。 互联网不是法外之地,在网络上发布信息、发表言论必须遵守法律法规,对于编造、传播、散布谣言等行为,网信、公安等部门将依法依规严厉打击,共同维护清 朗网络空间。 来源:网信郑州 证券时报各平台所有原创内容,未经书面授权,任何单位及个人不得转载。我社保留追 究相关 行 为主体法律责任的权利。 转载与合作可联系证券时报小助理,微信ID:SecuritiesTimes END 点击关键字可查看 潜望系列深度报道丨 股事会专栏 丨 投资小红书 丨 e公司调查 丨 时报会客厅 丨 十大明星私募访谈 丨 重大资产重组!688051,明起停牌 丨 刚刚!小米回 应"汽车工厂内电池产线起火" 丨 中东突发! 丨 俄乌,重大突发! 丨 字节跳动,大消息!风投女王出手! 丨 中美两军举行年度会晤 丨 "鸽声"提振市场! 美股全线上涨! 丨 降息 ...
霸王茶姬创始人张俊杰辟谣:此前从未有过婚姻,也从未有“茶叶富商残疾女儿”的任何故事,家人受到很大伤害,有必要站出来说话
Mei Ri Jing Ji Xin Wen· 2025-11-22 01:29
张俊杰(霸王茶姬) 好久没发朋友圈了,这几天,收到很多朋友 对我们婚礼的祝贺,真的很感谢大家。但确 实没想到信息传播引来了如此多的关注,也 着实让我们受宠若惊。 每经编辑|何小桃 近日,霸王茶姬创始人张俊杰婚礼一事,成为舆论焦点。11月21日,张俊杰本人通过朋友圈证实了这一婚讯,并透露已于今年6月登记领证。在感谢公众 祝福的同时,张俊杰也表示:此前围绕他婚姻和创业的诸多谣言,让其本人及家人受到了很大伤害,"有必要站出来说话"。 详情 自2024年11月起,网络上关于张俊杰的谣言层出不穷,诸如"娶富豪的残疾女儿生了孩子""拥有万亩茶园"等等,尤其是短视频平台被大量传播。造谣者通 过反复炮制相同题材的内容,关联相关词吸引眼球,并借此实现流量变现。 霸王茶姬方面表示,他们已使用法律手段对造谣者进行了打击。今年4月,人民法院公告网公布的一则起诉状副本及开庭传票,显示了与该系列谣言相关 网络侵权责任纠纷的处理进展:造谣者依法受到了处罚,并公开道歉。张俊杰发布的朋友圈引用了道歉截屏。 我与海纯相识相恋,在茫茫人海里,能够遇 到和自己灵魂契合、同频共振的另一半是人 生之幸。今年6月,我们领了证,组建了小 家庭。携手迈入婚姻 ...
霸王茶姬创始人辟谣
Di Yi Cai Jing· 2025-11-21 23:26
作者 | 第一财经 揭书宜 近日,霸王茶姬创始人张俊杰婚礼一事,成为舆论焦点。11月21日,张俊杰本人通过朋友圈证实了这一 婚讯,并透露已于今年6月登记领证。在感谢公众祝福的同时,张俊杰也表示:此前围绕他婚姻和创业 的诸多谣言,让其本人及家人受到了很大伤害,"有必要站出来说话"。 "我郑重声明:在我遇见我妻子(高海纯)前,从未有过婚姻,也从未发生'茶叶富商残疾女儿'的任何 故事。"张俊杰在他的朋友圈表示。 据了解,张俊杰17岁投身奶茶行业,2017年在昆明创立霸王茶姬。随后8年,霸王茶姬在全球范围内开 设了超过7000家门店,注册会员突破2亿人。2025年4月,这家企业于纳斯达克上市。 自2024年11月起,网络上关于张俊杰的谣言层出不穷,诸如"娶富豪的残疾女儿生了孩子""拥有万亩茶 园"等等,尤其是短视频平台被大量传播。造谣者通过反复炮制相同题材的内容,关联相关词吸引眼 球,并借此实现流量变现。 霸王茶姬方面表示,他们已使用法律手段对造谣者进行了打击。今年4月,人民法院公告网公布的一则 起诉状副本及开庭传票,显示了与该系列谣言相关网络侵权责任纠纷的处理进展:造谣者依法受到了处 罚,并公开道歉。张俊杰刚刚发布 ...
针对“卖茅台低于市场价将被罚”等相关谣言 抖音官方再度回应
Xin Jing Bao· 2025-11-12 02:40
Core Viewpoint - Douyin officially refuted rumors regarding new regulations that penalize selling Moutai below market price, clarifying that the platform is addressing issues related to false advertising and suspiciously low prices [1] Group 1: Rumor Clarification - Douyin issued a statement on November 10 to clarify that the rumors about penalizing sellers for low-priced Moutai are unfounded [1] - The platform has initiated a special campaign to combat the misuse of "fake low-priced Moutai" for misleading promotions and to address concerns about potential counterfeit products [1] Group 2: Media and Consumer Response - Despite the official clarification, media outlets continued to spread the rumors on November 11, misrepresenting Douyin's actions as price control and interference with merchants' pricing rights [1] - Douyin identified that similar rumors appeared across different media platforms, suggesting manipulation of public opinion by a competing e-commerce platform [1] Group 3: Call for Integrity - Douyin emphasized the importance of respecting factual truth and urged consumers, merchants, and media to avoid spreading rumors to maintain a healthy online environment and market order [1] - The company stated that it would take legal action against those who intentionally spread rumors and distort facts [1]
“卖茅台低于市场价将被罚”?抖音官方再辟谣
第一财经· 2025-11-11 12:36
Core Viewpoint - Douyin has officially refuted rumors regarding new regulations that penalize selling Moutai below market price, clarifying that the platform is addressing false advertising and suspicious low-price behaviors related to Moutai sales [1] Group 1: Rumor Clarification - On November 10, Douyin responded to rumors about penalties for selling Moutai below market price, stating that these claims are unfounded [1] - The platform initiated a special action to combat false advertising and irregular low-price behaviors that could indicate counterfeit risks [1] Group 2: Media and Consumer Impact - Despite the official refutation, some media outlets continued to spread the rumors, misrepresenting Douyin's actions as price control and interference with merchants' pricing rights [1] - The spread of these rumors not only misleads consumers but also harms the platform's legal rights and the overall industry ecosystem [1] Group 3: Call for Integrity - Douyin urges consumers, merchants, and media to respect the truth, avoid spreading rumors, and work together to maintain a healthy online environment and market order [1] - The company emphasizes that it will take legal action against those who intentionally spread rumors and distort facts [1]
造谣充“劣质电”致车辆自燃,警方通报→
第一财经· 2025-11-07 01:18
Core Viewpoint - A man in Shunyi District, Beijing, was apprehended by police for spreading false rumors about a certain brand of electric vehicle, claiming that it caught fire due to "inferior electricity" [3][4]. Group 1 - The individual, identified as Chen, fabricated a story using images of a vehicle fire to gain attention on social media [3]. - The police acted promptly upon receiving reports of the rumor and arrested Chen for his actions [4]. - Authorities emphasized the importance of adhering to laws and regulations online, warning against the dissemination of false information that disrupts public order [4].
在小米汽车直播间多次谩骂、造谣,一男子被刑拘
Guan Cha Zhe Wang· 2025-10-31 15:39
Core Points - Beijing police reported four typical cases under the "Net Clean - 2025" initiative, highlighting the crackdown on the spread of false information online [1][2][3] Group 1: Case Summaries - Case 1: A 38-year-old man, Shen, was detained for spreading false rumors in a live stream related to a certain electric vehicle brand, claiming "dozens of cars exploded," which caused significant social impact [1] - Case 2: A 34-year-old man, Chao, fabricated a story about saving a girl from being hit by a car to gain attention, misleading many netizens and resulting in administrative punishment [2] - Case 3: A 59-year-old woman, Song, spread false information about a fatal incident caused by strong winds, which misled the public and led to administrative punishment [2] - Case 4: A 38-year-old woman, Wang, falsely claimed a large-scale layoff at a network company, causing widespread misinformation and receiving administrative punishment [2] Group 2: Police Warning - Beijing police emphasized that the internet is not a lawless space and will take strict action against those who create and disseminate false information that disrupts social order [3] - The police urged netizens to adhere to laws and regulations, maintain rationality when encountering unverified information, and collectively work towards a healthy online environment [3]
净网—2025|网警提醒:别把AI用错了地方!
Huan Qiu Wang Zi Xun· 2025-10-28 23:52
Core Insights - The proliferation of AI-generated content has significantly lowered the barriers for spreading rumors, leading to legal and ethical violations as individuals seek attention and profit [1][2] - Recent cases in Weihai highlight the misuse of AI tools to create and disseminate false information, disrupting public order and causing social panic [2][6] Case Summaries - Case One: A netizen in Weihai, Zhang, used an AI tool to fabricate a rumor about "live streaming sales from prison" to gain followers and profit, which led to public disorder [2] - Case Two: During a typhoon in Guangdong, another netizen, Chi, created a false video claiming damage to two school buildings, misleading many and causing panic [2] Legal Responsibilities - According to the Public Security Administration Punishment Law of the People's Republic of China, spreading rumors or falsely reporting emergencies can result in detention of five to ten days and fines up to 500 yuan; lighter offenses may incur shorter detention or fines [5] Risk Insights - The emergence of AI-generated rumors has led to a clearly defined gray industry, capable of producing 4,000 to 7,000 fake articles daily at a cost significantly lower than traditional methods [6] - AI rumors pose exponential risks compared to traditional rumors due to their high realism and ability to quickly evolve and counteract debunking efforts [6] Prevention Strategies - Information receivers can identify potential AI-generated rumors by checking sources, observing details in images and videos, verifying logical consistency, and utilizing authoritative debunking platforms [7] Law Enforcement Recommendations - Authorities emphasize that the internet is not a lawless space and urge netizens to adhere to laws, refrain from creating or spreading rumors, and report any illegal activities related to false information [9]
编造“爆炸”谣言、制造恐慌 江西网警依法查处
Yang Shi Wang· 2025-10-24 15:35
Core Viewpoint - The article highlights a recent case in Jiangxi Pingxiang where an individual was punished for spreading false information online, emphasizing the legal consequences of such actions in the digital space [1][2][3]. Group 1: Incident Overview - The Pingxiang Cyber Police discovered a post claiming an explosion in Shangli County on October 6, which was later confirmed to be a fabricated rumor [2]. - The false information caused public panic and disrupted social order, leading to the investigation of the individual responsible for the post [2]. Group 2: Legal Consequences - According to the Public Security Administration Punishment Law of the People's Republic of China, spreading rumors and intentionally disrupting public order can result in detention of 5 to 10 days and fines up to 500 yuan [3]. - The individual, Chen, was administratively detained for 10 days for his actions, which were classified as deliberately disturbing public order [3]. Group 3: Public Awareness and Responsibility - The article calls on internet users to adhere to legal standards by not creating, believing, or disseminating rumors, and to verify information before sharing [4]. - It encourages users to act as responsible netizens by reporting rumors to authorities, contributing to a cleaner online environment [4].
短剧导演熬夜猝死?浙江东阳警方通报
Zhong Guo Xin Wen Wang· 2025-09-30 03:43
Core Points - The news reports that the claim of a short drama director dying from overwork is a rumor, confirmed by the police [1][3] - A man named Ma, aged 35, fabricated the story to gain attention, leading to public concern and negative social impact [3] - Ma has been detained for disturbing public order under relevant laws [3] Summary by Categories Incident Details - The incident occurred on September 27, 2025, when Ma posted false information about the director's death online [3] - The police have clarified that the information circulating was not true and was intended to mislead the public [3] Legal Actions - Ma has been administratively detained for creating false facts that disrupt public order, violating the Public Security Administration Punishment Law of the People's Republic of China [3] - The police emphasize a "zero tolerance" approach towards malicious online activities that spread false information for gaining traffic [3]