业内人士认为，资本市场具有很强的信息敏感性，编造、传播资本市场虚假信息以及其他违法违规言 论，扰乱信息传播秩序，影响市场稳定运行，将受到法律惩处。网信部门和证券监管部门提醒广大网 民，树立正确投资理念，增强风险防范意识，加强金融信息辨别，不造谣、不传谣、不信谣，共同营造 清朗的网络空间。 维护市场正常交易秩序 业内人士表示，这类账号捏造资本市场监管政策，篡改歪曲政策文件内容，歪曲解读资本市场基础制 度，扰乱了公众认知和投资者预期，影响政策落地实施，干扰证券期货市场正常交易秩序。 网信部门开展"清朗·优化营商网络环境－整治涉企网络黑嘴专项行动"，积极处置涉企网络侵权不法行 为，督促重点网站平台强化涉企信息内容管理，从严从快处置一批涉企违法违规账号。业内人士认为， 这类账号散布对金融机构及金融行业的负面言论，否定和攻击上市公司群体，抹黑拟上市公司和上市公 司，对企业和行业健康发展造成了不良影响。 中国证监会12月19日消息，国家网信办近期会同证监会深入整治涉资本市场网上不实信息，依法处置一 批炮制谣言、非法荐股的账号。 此外，2021年以来，中国上市公司协会配合中央宣传部等部门联合开展新闻"打假治敲"专项行动，建 ...

Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes the urgent need for a comprehensive governance system to address the challenges posed by AI-generated misinformation, highlighting the inadequacy of mere fact-checking in the face of evolving technology [1][3]. Group 1: Current Challenges - Recent incidents of AI-generated misinformation, such as false claims about installing elevators on Mount Everest, illustrate the growing threat of misleading content that exploits human psychological tendencies [1][2]. - The emergence of a gray industry around AI forgery techniques, including services that create fake social media accounts and utilize deepfake technology, poses significant risks, including criminal activities [2][3]. Group 2: Governance Strategies - A three-pronged governance approach is proposed, consisting of technical standards, regulatory innovation, and legal improvements to effectively combat AI-generated misinformation [3][4]. - Implementation of a mandatory labeling system for AI-generated content is recommended to inform users and mitigate the risks associated with deceptive media [3][4]. - The development of advanced regulatory tools, such as AI and big data technologies, is essential for identifying and eliminating false information online [4]. Group 3: Legal Framework - There is a call for the enhancement of existing laws related to cybersecurity, data protection, and personal information to specifically address the creation and dissemination of AI-generated misinformation [4]. - Strong legal repercussions for those engaging in illegal activities using AI-generated misinformation are necessary to deter such actions and protect public interests [4].

Core Viewpoint - Recent rumors about the installation of elevators on Mount Everest and the Himalayas have been debunked, with authorities confirming that there are no such plans in place and that the circulated images and videos are AI-generated false information [2][4]. Group 1: Misinformation and Its Impact - The rumors were propagated by certain marketing accounts using AI to create fake images and videos of various tourist attractions in Tibet, misleading the public and disrupting the online environment [4]. - The misleading content combines "realistic visuals + deceptive statements" to confuse viewers, which not only misguides public perception but also severely disrupts the online ecosystem [4]. Group 2: Official Response and Public Advisory - The internet information department has warned that the fabrication and dissemination of rumors that disturb public order and cause negative social impacts will be strictly investigated by law enforcement [4]. - The public is advised to refrain from creating, believing, or spreading rumors and to avoid trusting or sharing unverified information from unofficial sources, emphasizing that all information should be based on official announcements [4].

Core Viewpoint - Tencent has been actively involved in ensuring information authenticity and controlling misinformation, especially in the AI era, through various initiatives aimed at creating a safe information dissemination mechanism and fulfilling its social responsibilities [1][2]. Group 1: AI Era Information Environment - The arrival of AI technology has blurred the lines between true and false information, leading to a complex landscape where information often intertwines truth and distortion [2][3]. - The public's ability to discern information is crucial; enhancing this ability can significantly reduce the impact of misinformation [2][3]. - The current information environment serves as a training ground for the public, fostering critical thinking and improving media literacy over time [3]. Group 2: Structural Characteristics of AI Misinformation - AI-generated misinformation has transitioned from primarily text-based formats to include multimodal forms such as images, audio, and video, with text still dominating at 52% [32]. - The use of AI tools allows for the rapid generation of highly convincing misinformation, which poses significant challenges for verification and detection [33][37]. - AI misinformation often presents itself as entirely fabricated content, making it difficult to identify and counteract due to the lack of real reference points [34][37]. Group 3: Mechanisms of Misinformation Spread - AI misinformation is often driven by current social issues, with 49% of such misinformation linked to trending topics [38]. - The primary motivation behind the spread of AI misinformation is economic gain, accounting for 71% of cases, indicating a trend towards industrialized misinformation production [42]. - Misinformation can also evoke fear and emotional responses, which further facilitates its spread among the public [43]. Group 4: Systemic Impact of Misinformation - The systemic impact of misinformation affects various sectors, including economic stability, cultural identity, public health, and social cohesion [45]. - Misinformation can undermine social stability (37%) and cultural identity (29%), leading to a broader erosion of trust within society [47]. - The economic implications of misinformation can manifest through market panic and loss of consumer confidence, with 22% of misinformation impacting economic information [47].