来源：央视新闻客户端 在属地管辖原则的基础上，引入违法行为发生地的省级市场监管部门管辖权，这一"住所地管辖为主、 违法行为发生地省级管辖为辅"的权限划分模式，既遵循了"谁注册、谁监管"的基本原则，确保平台主 体责任监管的连续性，又赋予违法行为发生地省级市场监管部门直接管辖权，有效破解了跨地域监 管"管辖权争议"难题。 同时，《规定》聚焦信息不对称这一关键堵点，要求平台提供者分别于每年一月和七月，向各省级市场 监管部门报送其行政区域内入网餐饮服务提供者的经营资质等身份信息，让各地省级市场监管部门能够 全面掌握本区域入网餐饮服务提供者的基础信息。 记者今天从市场监管总局召开的新闻发布会上了解到，《网络餐饮服务经营者落实食品安全主体责任监 督管理规定》 （以下简称《规定》）将于6月1日正式实施。 针对跨地域案件查办中经常出现的"取证难、调证慢"问题，《规定》明确，市场监管部门在监督检查、 抽检监测、案件调查等执法活动中，可要求平台提供者和入网餐饮服务提供者提供相关电子数据、技术 监测记录等信息，相关主体必须予以配合，确保异地市场监管部门能够快速获取案件查办所需证据材 料，大幅提升跨地域执法效率。 市场监管总局有关负 ...

《规定》要求外卖平台为外卖商家履行信息公示义务提供必要的技术支持，确保相关信息能够清晰、稳 定、便捷地展示给消费者，不得设置技术壁垒或故意隐藏信息；对未按规定公示信息、公示信息虚假或 不准确等行为的外卖商家及时进行处置。 来源：央视新闻客户端 作者: 李晶晶 《规定》明确，专门从事外卖服务、不提供堂食的外卖商家必须在其主页面显著位置设置"无堂食"标 识，且外卖平台需将该标识同步展示在商家列表页面。这样一来，消费者在下单前就能清晰知晓商家的 经营模式中有没有堂食，从而结合自身对餐饮服务的需求与安全预期作出理性选择。 还将推行可视化公示，让"加工过程"不再"雾里看花"。《规定》构建了"互联网+明厨亮灶"的公示体 系，倡导外卖商家通过"互联网+明厨亮灶"等方式，向社会公开餐食加工制作过程。要求外卖平台需在 入网餐饮服务提供者列表页面展示相关标识，让消费者一目了然。 记者今天从市场监管总局召开的新闻发布会上了解到，《网络餐饮服务经营者落实食品安全主体责任监 督管理规定》将于6月1日正式实施。 根据市场监管总局发布的《网络餐饮服务经营者落实食品安全主体责任监督管理规定》，6月1日开始， 外卖网店名称必须与实体经营门面招 ...

Core Viewpoint - The National Market Supervision Administration has drafted regulations to clarify the responsibilities of third-party platforms and online food service providers regarding food safety, aiming to prevent issues like "ghost takeout" [2][5] Group 1: Responsibilities of Platforms and Providers - The regulations emphasize the need for platforms to conduct on-site inspections of new food service providers and maintain records of these inspections [2] - Platforms must ensure that food service providers implement "Internet + Bright Kitchen" standards before they can engage in online transactions [2] - The regulations also address the issue of false advertising by requiring platforms to label providers that do not offer dine-in services with a "no dine-in" mark [3][5] Group 2: Consumer Behavior and Market Impact - Consumers often rely on the presence of dine-in services to gauge the quality of food providers, as a busy restaurant typically indicates good reputation [4] - The prevalence of false advertising, where providers misrepresent their dine-in status, can mislead consumers and affect their purchasing decisions [4][5] - The new regulations aim to rectify these misleading practices and promote responsible advertising among food service providers [5]

Core Viewpoint - The National Market Supervision Administration has drafted regulations to clarify the responsibilities of third-party platforms and food service providers in ensuring food safety, aiming to prevent issues like "ghost takeout" [1][2] Group 1: Responsibilities of Platforms and Providers - The regulations emphasize the need for platforms to conduct on-site inspections of new food service providers and maintain records of these inspections [1] - Platforms must ensure that food service providers implement "Internet + Bright Kitchen" practices before they can engage in transactions on the platform [1] - The regulations require platforms to label providers that do not offer dine-in services, which addresses consumer confusion and promotes transparency [2][3] Group 2: Consumer Behavior and Market Dynamics - Consumers often rely on the presence of dine-in customers as an indicator of food quality, influencing their decision to order takeout [2][3] - The prevalence of false advertising by some providers, who misrepresent their dine-in status, manipulates consumer perceptions and can lead to dissatisfaction [3] - The regulations aim to address these deceptive practices and reinforce the responsibilities of both platforms and providers to maintain consumer trust [3] Group 3: Regulatory Impact and Industry Development - The introduction of these regulations is seen as a targeted response to the growing issues within the online food service industry, promoting a healthier development environment [3] - Clear penalties for non-compliance are outlined, reinforcing the importance of adherence to these new standards [3]

Core Viewpoint - The National Market Supervision Administration has drafted regulations to clarify the responsibilities and boundaries of third-party platforms and food service providers in ensuring food safety, aiming to prevent issues like "ghost takeout" [1] Group 1: Regulatory Changes - The proposed regulations require platforms to label food service providers that do not offer dine-in services with a "no dine-in" mark on their main page, addressing the issue of misleading promotions [1] - The regulations emphasize the need for platforms to conduct qualification reviews, regular monitoring, and information disclosure regarding food service providers [1] Group 2: Consumer Behavior and Misleading Promotions - Many consumers rely on the presence of dine-in services as an indicator of a restaurant's quality, leading to potential deception when restaurants falsely advertise their popularity [2] - The practice of using misleading images or AI-generated content to create a false impression of dine-in traffic manipulates consumer psychology and can lead to dissatisfaction when the actual service does not meet expectations [2] Group 3: Industry Implications - The increase in restaurants that only offer takeout highlights the need for clear advertising practices to avoid false claims, indicating a shift in the industry towards more stringent regulations [3] - The regulations serve as a reminder to platforms and businesses that they must uphold their responsibilities even without direct consumer interaction [3]