美以军事行动
Search documents
知情人士称美政府要求以色列停止袭击伊朗能源设施
财联社· 2026-03-10 19:02
Core Viewpoint - The Trump administration has requested Israel to halt further airstrikes on Iranian energy facilities, particularly oil infrastructure, marking the first significant constraint on Israeli military actions since the joint operations began against Iran [1] Group 1 - The request from the U.S. government is driven by concerns that continued attacks could lead to a spike in global oil prices and provoke large-scale retaliation from Iran against energy infrastructure in the Gulf region [1] - The Trump administration considers strikes on Iranian oil facilities as a "last resort," only to be undertaken if Iran first attacks energy facilities in Gulf countries [1]
国际观察|美以闭门会晤有何盘算
Xin Hua She· 2026-02-12 14:40
Core Insights - The meeting between U.S. President Trump and Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu focused on Iran, Gaza, and the Middle East situation, with Netanyahu aiming to influence U.S.-Iran negotiations and increase U.S. demands on Iran [1][2] Group 1: U.S.-Israel Relations - Netanyahu's visit to the U.S. was primarily to push for a broader agreement that includes not only Iran's nuclear program but also its missile capabilities and regional influence [2][3] - Both leaders agreed to maintain close coordination on security matters, emphasizing Israel's security needs during their discussions [2] Group 2: Iran Negotiations - The U.S. and Iran have been engaged in indirect negotiations, but key issues remain unresolved, particularly Iran's uranium enrichment and missile program [2][3] - Iran has expressed willingness to discuss its uranium enrichment levels but insists on the respect of its rights under the Non-Proliferation Treaty [3][5] Group 3: Military Considerations - There are indications that the meeting may have been aimed at preparing a joint military action plan in case negotiations with Iran fail [4][5] - The U.S. has increased military presence in the Middle East, with the deployment of the USS Abraham Lincoln strike group, suggesting a dual strategy of negotiation and military readiness [5]