Group 1 - Trump's stance on Greenland has shifted dramatically from threats of military intervention and economic sanctions to a "diplomatic compromise" mediated by NATO, temporarily diffusing an imminent transatlantic trade war [2] - On January 21, Trump announced via social media that he and NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte had reached an agreement on future cooperation regarding Greenland and the Arctic, indicating that the planned tariffs on Europe would not be implemented [2] - This unexpected move disrupted the agenda of an emergency EU leaders' meeting intended to establish a united front against Trump's "economic coercion" and ambitions regarding European territories [3][4] Group 2 - EU officials expressed concerns that Trump's seemingly flexible strategy could jeopardize EU unity and raise serious doubts about the credibility of U.S. commitments [5] - The core of this shift focuses on security cooperation rather than mere territorial acquisition, with Trump hinting at U.S. mining rights in Greenland and missile defense system deployment [7] - Despite the easing of tariff threats, Trump's unpredictability leaves European capitals uncertain about the longevity of U.S. commitments, with officials questioning whether he might revert to imposing tariffs or military action [8] Group 3 - Denmark and Greenland welcomed the de-escalation cautiously but reiterated their core stance that the territory is not for sale, with Danish Foreign Minister Rasmussen asserting that U.S. ownership of Greenland is impossible [9] - Rasmussen indicated a willingness to negotiate on U.S. security concerns, while left-wing Danish politicians warned against treating Greenland as a negotiable asset, emphasizing that it belongs to the Greenlandic people [10]