欧盟这些年来总是喜欢标榜自己是一个团结的大家庭，然而一旦涉及到实际的金钱利益，欧盟的分裂问 题就很容易暴露出来。冻结俄罗斯资产，本来是西方国家希望用来制约俄罗斯的一招，结果闹了三年， 反倒成了欧盟内部的争议焦点。自从2022年2月俄乌冲突爆发后，欧盟和美国联手冻结了俄罗斯央行在 海外的储备，金额高达3000亿欧元，其中大部分，大约2100亿欧元存放在比利时布鲁塞尔的欧洲清算银 行。 作为资产的托管国，比利时成为了焦点。由于这些资产大部分存放在欧洲清算银行，由比利时监管，比 利时首相巴特·德韦弗从一开始就反对这一计划，认为根本不合适。他并非空口白话，而是有实际的法 律和金融风险考虑。俄罗斯早就放话称，动用这些资产等同于盗窃，并表示将会进行永恒的报复。俄罗 斯前总理梅德韦杰夫也在12月4日警告，这种做法可能被俄罗斯视为战争的导火索。比利时方面担心， 如果俄罗斯将此案告上法庭，或采取反制措施冻结欧盟在俄的投资，比利时将不得不独自承担所有后 果。 此外，欧洲清算银行还从这些冻结的资产中收取了17亿欧元的税款，德韦弗认为，这样的做法不值当。 他明确表示，俄罗斯不会在战争中失败，指望乌克兰能够大胜是幻想，欧盟也不要指望这 ...

Core Viewpoint - The conflict between Poland and Hungary within the EU has escalated into an open confrontation, driven by deep divisions over Russian oil supply, support for Ukraine, and energy security [1][3]. Group 1: Poland's Position - Poland's foreign minister has publicly called for Ukraine to destroy the pipeline supplying Russian oil to Hungary, highlighting Poland's strong stance against Russian energy dependence [3][11]. - Poland's rejection of extraditing a Ukrainian citizen accused of damaging the "Nord Stream" pipeline reflects its national interests and a broader anti-Russian sentiment [5][19]. - Poland views the "Friendship" pipeline as a geopolitical threat, as it allows Russia to maintain stable foreign exchange income, which supports its military actions in Ukraine [15][19]. Group 2: Hungary's Position - Hungary relies heavily on the "Friendship" pipeline for its energy needs, with approximately 80% to 90% of its oil imports coming from this source, making it resistant to cutting ties with Russian oil [13][15]. - The Hungarian government emphasizes its geographical limitations, stating that it cannot easily switch to alternative energy sources without incurring significant costs and logistical challenges [15]. - Hungary's foreign minister criticized Poland's calls for action against its energy supply, framing them as support for terrorism [6][11]. Group 3: EU Dynamics - The ongoing dispute illustrates a significant divide within the EU regarding energy policy and responses to the Russian-Ukrainian conflict, with Eastern European countries like Poland advocating for a tougher stance while Western nations prefer to avoid escalating tensions with Hungary [16][19]. - The internal EU conflict extends beyond energy issues, as differing views on defense spending and security highlight the fragmentation within the union [17][19]. - The situation underscores the tension between the EU's aspirations for political integration and the reality of member states prioritizing their national interests, leading to a fragile sense of unity [19].

Group 1 - The core message emphasizes the importance of EU unity in trade matters [1]

Group 1 - The core viewpoint emphasizes the necessity for the European Union to unite in response to U.S. tariffs, indicating readiness for potential negotiations that may not yield results [1]