格隆汇2月26日｜中国国家电脑病毒应急处理中心等发表《头号玩家——美国技术霸权下的全球虚拟货 币资产收割行动深层解析》报告，据不完全统计指，2022-2025年，美国通过各类案件累计全球没收虚 拟货币资产价值超过300亿美元。 涉及柬埔寨跨国犯罪太子集团创办人陈志案没收规模达150亿美元，涉约12.7万枚比特币，占没收资产 比重50%。针对加密货币交易所币安(Binance)及其创办人赵长鹏发起"民事+刑事"案，最终币安须支付 合共43亿美元罚款，赵长鹏签署认罪协议后被特赦。没收两人资产合共193亿美元，占整体比重达逾 64%。 报告还指，美国通过技术霸权收割全球虚拟资产，本质为维护其经济霸权及美元地位，一方面通过没 收、罚款方式直接掠夺，另一方面通过掌控虚拟资产监管规则及交易流动，将数码金融体系纳入美元主 导的全球金融框架。美国通过公开拍卖变现资产而获利巨大。单是2013年美国联邦调查局关闭暗网交易 平台"丝绸之路"所获比特币，于2014至2025年1月透过拍卖，收益超过100亿美元。 报告指，去年10月，美国纽约东区联邦检察官办公室宣布对陈志发起刑事指控，罪名涉及电讯网络诈 骗、洗黑钱等，并高调宣布没收其 ...

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses President Trump's proposed tariffs on semiconductor imports, which could reach up to 300%, aimed at encouraging foreign companies to invest in U.S. manufacturing while potentially disrupting global supply chains [1][2]. Group 1: Tariff Details and Implications - Trump announced a plan for a 100% tariff on semiconductor imports, with potential increases to 200% or 300% [1][2]. - Companies that establish research or manufacturing facilities in the U.S. may receive tariff exemptions, but failure to fulfill investment commitments could lead to retroactive tariffs [1][2]. - The tariffs are intended to reduce U.S. dependence on imported semiconductors and strengthen the U.S. position in competition with China [2][3]. Group 2: Impact on Companies - Foreign tech giants already investing in the U.S., such as TSMC and Samsung, may be exempt from the tariffs [2]. - The tariffs could affect various sectors, including electronics, appliances, and automotive industries, depending on whether U.S.-origin chips and chips in finished products are included [4][5]. - The uncertainty surrounding the implementation of these tariffs raises concerns about their effectiveness and the lack of clear guidelines from the White House [4]. Group 3: Economic Considerations - The estimated value of semiconductor imports to the U.S. in 2024 is around $40 billion, with significant imports from countries like Taiwan, Malaysia, and China [3]. - A substantial portion of chips imported into the U.S. may be manufactured by American companies but processed overseas before being re-imported [4]. - The long-term cost implications suggest that while companies may initially absorb costs through lower profit margins, consumers are likely to bear the brunt of these costs eventually [5].