Workflow
股东会召集与召开程序合法性
icon
Search documents
广东卓建(中山)律师事务所关于中炬高新技术实业(集团)股份有限公司二〇二五年第四次临时股东会的法律意见书
Core Viewpoint - The legal opinion regarding the 2025 Fourth Extraordinary General Meeting of Zhongju High-tech Industrial (Group) Co., Ltd. confirms that the meeting's procedures, participant qualifications, and voting processes comply with relevant laws and regulations, ensuring the legitimacy of the resolutions passed [3][17][26]. Group 1: Meeting Procedures - The meeting was convened by the company's board of directors based on a resolution passed on October 24, 2025, and the notice was published 15 days in advance [3][4]. - The meeting took place on November 11, 2025, at a specified location, combining on-site and online voting methods [5][22]. - The notice included details such as the meeting time, location, voting methods, and agenda items [3][6]. Group 2: Attendance and Voting - A total of 548 participants attended the meeting, representing 213,251,683 shares, which is 27.5189% of the total voting shares [7]. - An additional 544 shareholders participated via online voting, representing 213,211,231 shares, or 27.5137% of the total voting shares [7]. - The qualifications of all attendees, including shareholders and proxies, were verified and deemed valid [8][9]. Group 3: Resolutions and Voting Results - The meeting reviewed three main proposals, all of which were consistent with the agenda published in the notice [10][16]. - The proposal to appoint Li Junwei as a non-independent director was approved with 210,302,591 votes in favor, accounting for 98.6170% of the valid votes [12][13]. - The revised "Zhongju High-tech Board Meeting Rules" and "Implementation Rules for Cumulative Voting System" were also approved with significant majorities of 97.2700% and 97.2769%, respectively [14][15]. Group 4: Legal Opinion - The legal opinion confirms that the meeting's convening, procedures, participant qualifications, and voting results are all in compliance with the Company Law and relevant regulations [17][26]. - The resolutions passed during the meeting are considered legally valid and effective [17][26].
雅博股份: 北京国枫(深圳)律师事务所关于山东雅博科技股份有限公司2024年度股东会的法律意见书
Zheng Quan Zhi Xing· 2025-06-27 16:51
Core Viewpoint - The legal opinion issued by Beijing Guofeng (Shenzhen) Law Firm confirms the legality and validity of the procedures, qualifications, and voting results of the 2024 annual shareholders' meeting of Shandong Yabo Technology Co., Ltd. [1][12] Meeting Procedures - The meeting was convened by the company's sixth board of directors and publicly announced on June 7, 2025, detailing the time, location, and agenda [2][3]. - The meeting took place on June 27, 2025, combining on-site and online voting methods, with the on-site meeting held at the company's headquarters [3][4]. Attendance and Voting - A total of 284 participants, representing 693,905,918 shares, attended the meeting, accounting for 32.7182% of the total voting shares [4]. - The qualifications of attendees, including shareholders and proxies, were verified and deemed valid [4][12]. Voting Results - The meeting passed several key resolutions, including: - Approval of the 2024 Board of Directors' Work Report with 691,998,718 votes in favor, representing 99.7434% of the valid votes [5]. - Approval of the 2024 Supervisory Board's Work Report with 691,996,918 votes in favor, also representing 99.7434% [5]. - Approval of the 2024 Financial Settlement Report with 691,994,718 votes in favor, representing 99.7434% [6]. - Approval of the proposal not to distribute profits for 2024, with 691,689,918 votes in favor, representing 99.7041% [6]. - Approval of the expected related party transactions for 2025 with 194,218,182 votes in favor, representing 98.9885% of non-related shareholders [6]. - Approval of the proposal for the company and subsidiaries to apply for comprehensive credit limits with banks, receiving 194,188,682 votes in favor, representing 98.9735% of non-related shareholders [7]. Conclusion - The legal opinion concludes that the meeting's procedures, qualifications of attendees, and voting results comply with relevant laws and regulations, confirming their legality and validity [12].