Group 1 - The core viewpoint emphasizes the need for a smooth exit channel for equity investment institutions, suggesting that if A-shares can return to around 200 IPOs annually, along with over 100 overseas IPOs, it would improve the expectations of all types of investors and accelerate the return of invested capital to the primary market [1][2][12] - The establishment of the Sci-Tech Innovation Board has led to significant improvements in the technology innovation ecosystem in China, enhancing the efficiency of research results transformation and driving the growth of the hard technology industry [1][2] - The primary market has undergone substantial changes, with RMB funds and state-owned capital becoming the main players, and a trend towards early, small, and new investments in hard technology [1][2][6] Group 2 - Current challenges in the primary market include the nationalization of fundraising, scarcity of quality investment targets, increased exit pressure due to reduced IPO numbers, and unfair taxation methods [2][7][8] - Recommendations to address these challenges include ensuring smooth exit channels and standardizing personal income tax rates to 20%, calculated based on the entire fund rather than individual projects [2][8] - The dominance of state-owned capital in fundraising is attributed to a complex external environment, market fluctuations, and a decline in IPO numbers, which has diminished the willingness of private enterprises and high-net-worth individuals to participate in equity investment [6][7] Group 3 - The recent regulatory support for quality technology companies to go public includes the introduction of new policies aimed at facilitating the listing of unprofitable tech firms [9][10] - Investment institutions are encouraged to develop systematic industry research capabilities and enhance their ability to empower industries, focusing on clear investment logic and strategies [10][11] - Characteristics of quality investment targets include reasonable valuations, mastery of key technologies, experienced management teams, and the potential to grow into platform companies [10][11] Group 4 - The pressure on exit channels remains, with IPOs being the primary exit route for equity investment institutions, alongside active mergers and acquisitions [12][14] - Recent data indicates a significant increase in IPO applications, with 150 applications received in June alone, suggesting a potential recovery in the IPO market [13] - The North Exchange is expected to become a major listing venue, with anticipated improvements in liquidity and trading volume [13][14] Group 5 - The establishment of S funds has opened new exit channels for investors, although challenges such as the scarcity of quality underlying assets and pricing difficulties remain [15][16] - Recommendations for improving the S fund market include creating a valuation evaluation system and simplifying approval processes for state-owned capital [15][16]

本期导读： 还活着、 愿意领投 的民营机构不多了。 小微创投&投早投小 作为股权投资行业的从业者，之前写了不少本行观察的文章。从自身的从业来说，写这个题材， 一、是为了吐槽一下干这行的不容易；二、是了解自己、定位自身。我们这个行业的同行，大多时 间是在研究被投项目的赛道分析，而很少去分析自己在行业位置定位和竞争力。圈外人觉得："私 募"、"股权"、"投资"、"天使投资人"......这些词汇，听起来都是相对比较高大上的名词。给别人 投钱那是朝南坐，纯甲方！实际上，这个钱也不是大风刮来的，募集就是求人，投完还是要退出。 募集和退出，是纯乙方的活--求单和要账，这是全天下最难的几个事之一。真正做全整套链条，也 只有自己知道： 这活，真不好干！ 中国股权行业从2000年初起步，到今天有快25年的历史了。机构数量最多时候有3万家注册，细分 主业其实也是千奇百怪。如果把与我们类似的同类（比如说猫科动物），可以先这样用这样的条件 先筛一圈： 1. 有人民币基金，非纯美元； 这两个币种不一样，募集、管理、退出思路完全不一样； 2. 有盲池基金， 因为如果只有专项基金或者单一LP基金。这个基本上是通道+尽调的业务了； 3. ...