还是建议有关管理部门仔细考察一下，有无如此繁琐的必要？增加了多少征纳双方与相关主体的完税成 本？过去实行多年的劳务发放单位一体化代扣代缴老办法，加上最新的"金税工程"数字化信息监测手 段，应该设计最为便捷可靠的方式，最好不要采取这样大量增加社会负担的办法。谢谢 我今年7月在南方一个城市参加内部研讨，电话约定好就过去完成了任务，有劳务费2000元。其后为这 个事情折腾了几个月，在对方给予专门课件详细指导情况下，手机上的电子税务局流程我还是过不去， 碰到了需要在线上输入邀请函、合同和行程安排等佐证资料这一大套事情。后对方公务繁忙情况下，终 于把这些凑齐了，在年轻人作为助手帮我填报的情况之下，走了好几十道环节，填入双方的许多信息、 数据、长串号码，再做面容检测（曾多次没能过去最后终于过了）、身份证拍照等等。终于得到一个通 过程序而等待审核的结果，谢天谢地。 我国纳入个人所得税综合计征的有个人的薪酬、稿费、劳务收入等。为什么工薪不需要个人代扣增值 税，却冒出来劳务收入要代扣增值税？是什么依据？什么逻辑？很不明白。 ...

Group 1 - The core viewpoint emphasizes the need for a smooth exit channel for equity investment institutions, suggesting that if A-shares can return to around 200 IPOs annually, along with over 100 overseas IPOs, it would improve the expectations of all types of investors and accelerate the return of invested capital to the primary market [1][2][12] - The establishment of the Sci-Tech Innovation Board has led to significant improvements in the technology innovation ecosystem in China, enhancing the efficiency of research results transformation and driving the growth of the hard technology industry [1][2] - The primary market has undergone substantial changes, with RMB funds and state-owned capital becoming the main players, and a trend towards early, small, and new investments in hard technology [1][2][6] Group 2 - Current challenges in the primary market include the nationalization of fundraising, scarcity of quality investment targets, increased exit pressure due to reduced IPO numbers, and unfair taxation methods [2][7][8] - Recommendations to address these challenges include ensuring smooth exit channels and standardizing personal income tax rates to 20%, calculated based on the entire fund rather than individual projects [2][8] - The dominance of state-owned capital in fundraising is attributed to a complex external environment, market fluctuations, and a decline in IPO numbers, which has diminished the willingness of private enterprises and high-net-worth individuals to participate in equity investment [6][7] Group 3 - The recent regulatory support for quality technology companies to go public includes the introduction of new policies aimed at facilitating the listing of unprofitable tech firms [9][10] - Investment institutions are encouraged to develop systematic industry research capabilities and enhance their ability to empower industries, focusing on clear investment logic and strategies [10][11] - Characteristics of quality investment targets include reasonable valuations, mastery of key technologies, experienced management teams, and the potential to grow into platform companies [10][11] Group 4 - The pressure on exit channels remains, with IPOs being the primary exit route for equity investment institutions, alongside active mergers and acquisitions [12][14] - Recent data indicates a significant increase in IPO applications, with 150 applications received in June alone, suggesting a potential recovery in the IPO market [13] - The North Exchange is expected to become a major listing venue, with anticipated improvements in liquidity and trading volume [13][14] Group 5 - The establishment of S funds has opened new exit channels for investors, although challenges such as the scarcity of quality underlying assets and pricing difficulties remain [15][16] - Recommendations for improving the S fund market include creating a valuation evaluation system and simplifying approval processes for state-owned capital [15][16]