Workflow
薪酬分配机制改革
icon
Search documents
“董事长反对自己当选董事长”,年薪达435万元为何仍不满?本人回应
Mei Ri Jing Ji Xin Wen· 2025-12-03 03:39
"我们公司和其他上市公司相反,现在是没人想减持,导致股权结构僵化。" 12月2日晚,艾比森(SZ300389,股价16.01元,市值59亿元)实际控制人、董事长丁彦辉在接受《每日经济新闻》记者电话专访时,首次深度回应了其投 票反对自己连任董事长的罕见举动。 薪酬分配机制不合理,改革从我开始 他坦言,议案中写明的"对董事长岗位薪酬不满意"仅是表面理由,更深层的原因是公司治理结构、利益分配机制及薪酬分配机制存在问题。 "我要下决心改革。从我开始。"丁彦辉说道。 几日前,艾比森发布公告,其第六届董事会第一次会议审议通过了多个议案,但在选举第六届董事会董事长的议案中,丁彦辉本人投了反对票,理由 是"对董事长岗位薪酬不满意"。 艾比森2024年年报显示,丁彦辉当年从公司获得的税前报酬总额为435.56万元(包含员工持股计划的本金和收益173.99万元),同比大幅增加近150万元。 这一"自我否决"的反对票在社交媒体上引发热议,不少网友质疑:"435万元还不满意?" | :435万还不满意? 25-12-2 13:03 来自江苏 | 区 日 白 1 | | --- | --- | | 机 上一篇: 在办公室里笑出声了! ...
435万元年薪为何仍不满?艾比森实控人丁彦辉回应“反对自己当董事长”:薪酬分配不科学、不合理
Mei Ri Jing Ji Xin Wen· 2025-12-03 01:58
Core Viewpoint - The actual controller of Aibisen, Ding Yanhui, expressed dissatisfaction with the company's governance structure and compensation distribution mechanisms, indicating a need for internal reform, which he initiated by voting against his own re-election as chairman [1][4][5]. Group 1: Company Governance and Compensation - Ding Yanhui's vote against his re-election was primarily aimed at highlighting issues within the company's governance and compensation systems, rather than personal dissatisfaction with his salary of 4.36 million yuan, which increased significantly by nearly 1.5 million yuan year-on-year [2][3]. - The company reported a revenue of 3.663 billion yuan and a net profit of 117 million yuan for 2024, showing declines of 8.58% and 62.98% respectively compared to the previous year, while the first three quarters of the current year showed improvements with revenues of 2.872 billion yuan and a net profit of 185 million yuan, reflecting year-on-year growth of 5.66% and 57.33% [3][4]. Group 2: Shareholding Structure and Reform Challenges - Aibisen's shareholding structure is concentrated among three founders, with Ding Yanhui holding 33.78%, which complicates decision-making and reform efforts due to potential resistance from other major shareholders [6][8]. - Ding Yanhui indicated that the lack of willingness from other major shareholders to reduce their stakes is a significant barrier to implementing necessary reforms, which he believes would benefit the company by allowing for greater market participation [6][7].