蛋白质基础模型

Search documents
华山论剑!蛋白质AI模型哪家强?西湖大学/百图生科推出首个全面测试基准
生物世界· 2025-06-24 08:45
Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the launch of PFMBench, a comprehensive benchmarking tool for evaluating protein foundation models (PFMs) across various tasks, addressing the need for standardized assessments in the rapidly evolving field of protein science driven by AI advancements [2][3][24]. Summary by Sections Introduction to Protein Science and AI - Proteins are essential for life activities, and understanding them is crucial for disease treatment and new drug development. The AI wave is revolutionizing protein science, with models like ESM-2 and ProtT5 emerging to predict protein structures and functions [2]. The Need for Benchmarking - The protein model field faces challenges similar to comparing students taking different exams, leading to difficulties in assessing model performance. Existing benchmarks are either too limited in tasks or overlook multimodal models, resulting in fragmented evaluation results [7][8]. PFMBench Development - PFMBench was developed by West Lake University and BioMap, encompassing 38 tasks and 17 models across eight protein science domains, serving as a "final exam" for protein models [10]. Core Design of PFMBench - PFMBench is designed with modularity and efficiency in mind, integrating tasks, models, and tuning methods into a unified framework. It includes: 1. **Task Library**: 38 tasks categorized into eight types, covering the entire protein lifecycle [12]. 2. **Model Library**: 17 top models categorized into four types, with 12 core models selected based on performance benchmarks [14]. 3. **Tuning Protocols**: Supports parameter-efficient fine-tuning methods, allowing for quick adaptation to new tasks [15]. Key Findings from PFMBench - The analysis revealed four critical conclusions: 1. Task relevance allows for focusing on 11 representative tasks instead of testing all 38 [18]. 2. Multimodal models outperform pure sequence models, with ProTrek achieving a 75% win rate compared to ESM-2's 50% [19]. 3. Zero-shot evaluations may mislead developers, emphasizing the need for supervised tasks [20]. 4. The cost-effectiveness of model scaling is low, with DoRA fine-tuning emerging as a superior method [21]. Significance of PFMBench - PFMBench is a milestone in the industry, providing a standardized evaluation framework that promotes innovation and guides future research directions. It aims to accelerate biopharmaceutical applications by offering reliable assessments that shorten development cycles [24][25].