近日，国务院反垄断反不正当竞争委员会办公室对外卖平台服务行业市场竞争状况开展调查、评估。 1月9日晚，美团、淘宝闪购、京东外卖纷纷发文表态。 美团方面表示，1月9日下午，国务院反垄断反不正当竞争委员会办公室对外卖平台服务行业市场竞争状况开展调查、评估。美 团坚决拥护，将全力做好配合工作。 近一段时间以来，外卖市场"拼价格、拼补贴、控流量"等非理性竞争问题突出。美团多次呼吁行业回归理性，坚决反对"内卷 式"竞争。美团将以此次调查为契机，和行业内各平台一起，共同落实市场主体责任，公平参与市场竞争，促进外卖平台服务行 业创新和健康发展。 淘宝闪购表示，淘宝闪购深知公平竞争是市场经济的核心原则，也是推动外卖平台服务行业持续创新与健康发展的基石。淘宝 闪购始终坚持公平、公正、公开的原则，在商户管理、价格行为、配送员权益保障、消费者权益保护等方面，严格遵守《反垄 断法》、《反不正当竞争法》等相关法律法规，遵循《外卖平台服务管理基本要求》开展业务。 淘宝闪购欢迎并将积极配合此次行业市场竞争状况调查、评估工作，严格落实合规主体责任，持续与商户、生态合作伙伴等各 方携手，提供更多元化、更高质量的服务，共同维护好公平有序的市场环 ...

Group 1 - The market regulator has summoned Ele.me, Meituan, and JD.com to ensure compliance with relevant laws and regulations, aiming for a healthier and more sustainable development in the food delivery industry [1] - Recent social controversies arose from the "0 yuan purchase" promotions by some delivery platforms, highlighting the need for high-quality and healthy industry development [2] - All three platforms have expressed a desire to reduce irrational competition, with Taobao emphasizing merchant profitability, Meituan advocating for rational competition, and JD.com stating it has never engaged in extreme subsidy behaviors like "0 yuan purchase" [3] Group 2 - JD.com reported a significant increase in daily active users from 120-130 million to 169 million after launching its food delivery service, indicating a positive impact on its overall business [3] - The irrational subsidies from delivery platforms are seen as disruptive to the market order, necessitating timely regulatory intervention to promote orderly and rational industry development [3]